Anytype MCP

An MCP server enabling AI assistants to interact with Anytype - your encrypted, local and collaborative wiki - to organi

MCP Servers TypeScript Grade B Listed MIT
78.0/100
Rank #169 of 1328
Compare Anytype MCP

Strong public trust posture, backed by multiple independent signals.

Open compare tool Suggest correction
Listing state
Listed
Evidence coverage
Grade B · 3/5 signals
Last push
2026-09-10 · 3d ago
Recent change
No recent signal change

Is Anytype MCP safe? Anytype MCP scores 78.0/100 (Grade B), ranked #169 of 1328 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage B (3 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: its packages ship with cryptographic provenance; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 5.7/10; 99% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-09-10. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

Ranked neighbours in MCP Servers

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It
Improve adoption to lift the weakest part of the trust profile.
Recent Changes
2026-09-05
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 36 spots (#122 → #158)
2026-09-03
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 11 spots (#111 → #122)
2026-08-31
Scorecard Added
OSSF Scorecard: 5.8/10
Maintainer Checklist
Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 5.7/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.
49.2
Activity sub-score · out of 100
#91

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade B reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage B is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (3 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Signals refreshed 2026-09-13 20:11 UTC · Repo last pushed 3 days ago

Rank Trend

2026-08-11 2026-09-13

Activity & Reach

Stars
521
Forks
57
Last Push
2026-09-10
3 days ago
Commits (4 wk)
0?
Downloads (7d)
637
npm
HN mentions (30d)
Open Issues
16
Rank Change
▼4
was #165

Analysis

HVTrust Dimensions vs MCP Servers

78.0 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

Anytype MCP MCP Servers average (778 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits
19.6 / 25
9.5 above avg 10.1
Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance
18.0 / 18
4.6 above avg 13.4
Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard
13.3 / 17
1.2 above avg 12.1
Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity
11.8 / 20
in line with avg 12.1
AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads
10.3 / 20
3.3 above avg 7.0

Activity Inputs

49.2 / 100
StarsRepository reach
16.3 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
24.6 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
0.0 / 25
CommunityFork signal
8.2 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance
Verified
npm attestation
OSSF Scorecard
5.7 / 10
OpenSSF Scorecard · scanned Sep 7, 2026
Signed Commits
99%
of last 100 commits verified
Binary-Artifacts 10
Branch-Protection 3
CI-Tests 10
CII-Best-Practices 0
Code-Review 0
Contributors 3
Dangerous-Workflow 10
Dependency-Update-Tool 10
Fuzzing 0
License 10
Maintained 10
Packaging 10
Pinned-Dependencies 0
SAST 10
Security-Policy 10
Signed-Releases -1
Token-Permissions 0
Vulnerabilities 0

Is Anytype MCP safe?

Public supply-chain signals for Anytype MCP are strong: it has multiple independent trust indicators in place. This does not replace your own security review, but Anytype MCP carries less obvious unverified-evidence risk than projects with thin signals.
Does Anytype MCP publish package provenance?
Yes. Anytype MCP's package releases carry build provenance attestations, which cryptographically link the published package back to its source repository and CI workflow.
Does Anytype MCP have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
Anytype MCP has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 5.7/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.
Is Anytype MCP actively maintained?
Actively maintained. The repository was pushed to within the last 3 day(s).
What license does Anytype MCP use?
Anytype MCP ships under MIT. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are Anytype MCP's commits signed?
99% of the last 100 commits to Anytype MCP are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface
Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support
high confidence
Implemented
Anytype MCP appears to expose MCP server capabilities.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
External Service Dependencies
low confidence
None detected
No clear third-party provider dependency detected.
Credential signal: API keys or service config markers documented.
Tool / Plugin Surface
None detected
No clear plugin system or broad tool surface detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
high confidence
Match
Published package metadata matches the tracked repo
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
  • MCP signal live
  • External deps live
  • Tool / plugin surface live
  • Package provenance drift live
How this surface has changed

Detected changes to Anytype MCP's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.

2026-08-12
Provider Removed
Runtime surface shrank — no longer detected: Anthropic, OpenAI

Maintain Anytype MCP?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores Anytype MCP from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Reputation Timeline

Signal history
Rank 11Listed 1Surface 1Score 1HVTrust 1Scorecard 1
2026-09-05
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 36 spots (#122 → #158)
2026-09-03
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 11 spots (#111 → #122)
2026-08-31
Scorecard Added
OSSF Scorecard: 5.8/10
2026-08-31
Rank Moved
Rank rose 138 spots (#249 → #111)
2026-08-31
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 12.1pts (65.9 → 78.0)
2026-08-29
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 11 spots (#245 → #256)
2026-08-27
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 12 spots (#230 → #242)
2026-08-26
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 47 spots (#183 → #230)
2026-08-26
Activity Score Changed
Activity score down 12pts (61 → 49)
2026-08-23
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 44 spots (#132 → #176)
2026-08-17
Rank Moved
Rank rose 17 spots (#139 → #122)
2026-08-16
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 11 spots (#128 → #139)
2026-08-13
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 10 spots (#120 → #130)
2026-08-12
Provider Removed
Runtime surface shrank — no longer detected: Anthropic, OpenAI
2026-08-12
Rank Moved
Rank rose 13 spots (#133 → #120)
2026-08-08
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #123

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers
HVTrust 78.0 Grade B
Markdown:
[![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/anytype-mcp.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/anytype-mcp)
HTML:
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/anytype-mcp"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/anytype-mcp.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in MCP Servers

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · npm Registry (downloads, provenance) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON