MCP Inspector

Visual testing tool for MCP servers

Protocols & Tool Integration TypeScript Grade A Listed NOASSERTION Unlicensed
90.0/100
Rank #11 of 1308
Compare MCP Inspector

Strong public trust posture, backed by multiple independent signals.

Open compare tool Suggest correction
Listing state
Listed
Evidence coverage
Grade B · 3/5 signals
Last push
2026-08-19 · 0d ago
Recent change
No recent signal change

Is MCP Inspector safe? MCP Inspector scores 90.0/100 (Grade A), ranked #11 of 1308 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage B (3 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: its packages ship with cryptographic provenance; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 6.1/10; 71% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-08-19. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

Ranked neighbours in Protocols & Tool Integration

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It
Improve safety / integrity to lift the weakest part of the trust profile.
Recent Changes
2026-07-29
License Changed
License classification changed from open to unlicensed
2026-07-28
Activity Score Changed
Activity score up 12pts (77 → 89)
Maintainer Checklist
Declare an open license Publish a clear OSI-approved license so usage and maintenance terms are independently verifiable.
Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 6.1/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.
89.0
Activity sub-score · out of 100
#1

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade A reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage B is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (3 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Signals refreshed 2026-08-19 05:02 UTC · Repo last pushed today

Rank Trend

2026-08-11 2026-08-19

Activity & Reach

Stars
10.7k
Forks
1.5k
Last Push
2026-08-19
today
Commits (4 wk)
193
Downloads (7d)
185,338
npm
HN mentions (30d)
Open Issues
48
Rank Change
=
was #11

Analysis

HVTrust Dimensions vs Protocols & Tool Integration

90.0 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

MCP Inspector Protocols & Tool Integration average (58 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits
18.7 / 25
10.2 above avg 8.5
Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance
18.0 / 18
6.3 above avg 11.7
Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard
13.7 / 17
2.3 above avg 11.4
Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity
20.0 / 20
6.1 above avg 13.9
AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads
16.7 / 20
6.4 above avg 10.3

Activity Inputs

89.0 / 100
StarsRepository reach
24.2 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
25.0 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
25 / 25
CommunityFork signal
14.8 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance
Verified
npm attestation
OSSF Scorecard
6.1 / 10
OpenSSF Scorecard · scanned Aug 15, 2026
Signed Commits
71%
of last 100 commits verified
Binary-Artifacts 10
Branch-Protection 5
CI-Tests 10
CII-Best-Practices 0
Code-Review 0
Contributors 10
Dangerous-Workflow 10
Dependency-Update-Tool 10
Fuzzing 0
License 0
Maintained 10
Packaging 10
Pinned-Dependencies 1
SAST 1
Security-Policy 10
Signed-Releases -1
Token-Permissions 9
Vulnerabilities 0

Is MCP Inspector safe?

Public supply-chain signals for MCP Inspector are strong: it has multiple independent trust indicators in place. This does not replace your own security review, but MCP Inspector carries less obvious unverified-evidence risk than projects with thin signals.
Does MCP Inspector publish package provenance?
Yes. MCP Inspector's package releases carry build provenance attestations, which cryptographically link the published package back to its source repository and CI workflow.
Does MCP Inspector have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
MCP Inspector has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 6.1/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.
Is MCP Inspector actively maintained?
Actively maintained. The repository was pushed to within the last 1 day(s).
What license does MCP Inspector use?
MCP Inspector ships under NOASSERTION. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are MCP Inspector's commits signed?
71% of the last 100 commits to MCP Inspector are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

Compare MCP Inspector head-to-head

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface
Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support
high confidence
Implemented
MCP Inspector appears to expose MCP server capabilities.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
External Service Dependencies
low confidence
None detected
No clear third-party provider dependency detected.
Credential signal: API keys or service config markers documented.
Tool / Plugin Surface
None detected
No clear plugin system or broad tool surface detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
high confidence
Match
Published package metadata matches the tracked repo
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
  • MCP signal live
  • External deps live
  • Tool / plugin surface live
  • Package provenance drift live

Maintain MCP Inspector?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores MCP Inspector from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Reputation Timeline

Signal history
Rank 2Score 2Listed 1HVTrust 1Grade 1Scorecard 1License 1
2026-07-29
License Changed
License classification changed from open to unlicensed
2026-07-28
Activity Score Changed
Activity score up 12pts (77 → 89)
2026-07-18
Rank Moved
Rank rose 17 spots (#28 → #11)
2026-07-18
Activity Score Changed
Activity score up 9pts (68 → 77)
2026-07-15
Scorecard Added
OSSF Scorecard: 6.6/10
2026-07-15
Grade Changed
Trust grade B → A
2026-07-15
Rank Moved
Rank rose 56 spots (#90 → #34)
2026-07-15
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 13.9pts (71.6 → 85.5)
2026-07-14
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #90

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers
HVTrust 90.0 Grade A
Markdown:
[![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/mcp-inspector.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/mcp-inspector)
HTML:
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/mcp-inspector"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/mcp-inspector.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in Protocols & Tool Integration

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · npm Registry (downloads, provenance) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON