RegistryCompare › FastMCP (TypeScript) vs MCP Inspector

FastMCP (TypeScript) vs MCP Inspector

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of FastMCP (TypeScript) and MCP Inspector, two Protocols & Tool Integration projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

MCP Inspector leads on trust — 85.5/100 (Grade A) vs 81.6/100 (Grade A), a 3.9-point gap. Full breakdown below.
Signal FastMCP (TypeScript)punkpeye/fastmcp MCP Inspectormodelcontextprotocol/inspector
HVTrust score 81.6 85.5
Evidence grade A A
Coverage grade B B
Overall rank #53 #34
Rank in Protocols & Tool Integration #3 #2
GitHub stars 3.2k 10.4k
Last updated 1d ago today
Build provenance Yes Yes
OSSF Scorecard 3.9 / 10 6.6 / 10
License MIT NOASSERTION
Downloads 523k/wk 185k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 15.4 19.3
Identity & provenance / 18 18.0 18.0
Transparency / 17 11.8 14.1
Maintenance / 20 15.0 12.0
Adoption / 20 16.0 16.7
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server Implemented Implemented
External providers
Requires API keys No No
Plugin surface plugins plugins
Provenance drift Match Match
Open in the live compare tool → FastMCP (TypeScript) profile MCP Inspector profile More Protocols & Tool Integration →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.2 →