RegistryCompare › FastMCP (TypeScript) vs MCP Inspector

FastMCP (TypeScript) vs MCP Inspector

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of FastMCP (TypeScript) and MCP Inspector, two Protocols & Tool Integration projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

MCP Inspector leads on trust — 90.0/100 (Grade A) vs 86.2/100 (Grade A), a 3.8-point gap. Full breakdown below.
Signal FastMCP (TypeScript)punkpeye/fastmcp MCP Inspectormodelcontextprotocol/inspector
HVTrust score 86.2 90.0
Evidence grade A A
Coverage grade B B
Overall rank #38 #12
Rank in Protocols & Tool Integration #3 #1
GitHub stars 3.2k 10.6k
Last updated 1d ago 1d ago
Build provenance Yes Yes
OSSF Scorecard 4.5 / 10 6.2 / 10
License MIT NOASSERTION
Downloads 523k/wk 185k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 16.2 18.8
Identity & provenance / 18 18.0 18.0
Transparency / 17 12.3 13.8
Maintenance / 20 18.1 19.9
Adoption / 20 16.1 16.7
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server Implemented Implemented
External providers
Requires API keys No Yes
Plugin surface
Provenance drift Match Match
Open in the live compare tool → FastMCP (TypeScript) profile MCP Inspector profile More Protocols & Tool Integration →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →