MCP Apps vs MCP Inspector
An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of MCP Apps and MCP Inspector, two Protocols & Tool Integration projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.
MCP Apps leads on trust — 88.9/100 (Grade A) vs 82.9/100 (Grade A), a 6.0-point gap. Full breakdown below.
| Signal | MCP Appsmodelcontextprotocol/ext-apps | MCP Inspectormodelcontextprotocol/inspector |
|---|---|---|
| HVTrust score | 88.9 | 82.9 |
| Evidence grade | A | A |
| Coverage grade | B | B |
| Overall rank | #30 | #110 |
| Rank in Protocols & Tool Integration | #2 | #5 |
| GitHub stars | 2.9k | 10.9k |
| Last updated | 2d ago | today |
| Build provenance | Yes | Yes |
| OSSF Scorecard | 5.8 / 10 | 6.3 / 10 |
| License | NOASSERTION | — |
| Downloads | 3.5M/wk | 269k/wk |
| Trust dimensions (points earned) | ||
| Safety / integrity / 25 | 18.4 | 16.6 |
| Identity & provenance / 18 | 18.0 | 18.0 |
| Transparency / 17 | 13.4 | 5.4 |
| Maintenance / 20 | 17.8 | 20.0 |
| Adoption / 20 | 17.0 | 16.9 |
| Runtime capability surface (full matrix) | ||
| MCP server | Implemented | Implemented |
| External providers | 1 — Anthropic | — |
| Requires API keys | No | No |
| Plugin surface | plugins | — |
| Provenance drift | Match | Match |
Open in the live compare tool →
MCP Apps profile
MCP Inspector profile
More Protocols & Tool Integration →
How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →