RegistryCompare › A2A / Agent2Agent Protocol vs MCP Inspector

A2A / Agent2Agent Protocol vs MCP Inspector

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of A2A / Agent2Agent Protocol and MCP Inspector, two Protocols & Tool Integration projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

A2A / Agent2Agent Protocol leads on trust — 88.7/100 (Grade A) vs 85.5/100 (Grade A), a 3.2-point gap. Full breakdown below.
Signal A2A / Agent2Agent Protocolgoogle/A2A MCP Inspectormodelcontextprotocol/inspector
HVTrust score 88.7 85.5
Evidence grade A A
Coverage grade A B
Overall rank #13 #34
Rank in Protocols & Tool Integration #1 #2
GitHub stars 24.8k 10.4k
Last updated today today
Build provenance Yes Yes
OSSF Scorecard 7.0 / 10 6.6 / 10
License Apache-2.0 NOASSERTION
Downloads 2.6M/wk 185k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 21.2 19.3
Identity & provenance / 18 18.0 18.0
Transparency / 17 14.4 14.1
Maintenance / 20 16.6 12.0
Adoption / 20 19.1 16.7
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server Implemented
External providers
Requires API keys No No
Plugin surface plugins plugins
Provenance drift Unknown Match
Open in the live compare tool → A2A / Agent2Agent Protocol profile MCP Inspector profile More Protocols & Tool Integration →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.2 →