MCP AutoMem

MCP client for AutoMem — give Claude, Cursor, Codex, and other MCP tools durable graph+vector memory across conversations.

MCP Servers TypeScript Listed MIT

Is MCP AutoMem safe? Promising trust profile, but some evidence still deserves review.

OSSF Scorecard 5.1 / 10
Provenance Attested
Signed commits 100%
Last push 4d ago
Compare MCP AutoMem
Suggest a correction

In detail: MCP AutoMem scores 74.1/100 (Grade B), ranked #240 of 1325 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage B (3 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: its packages ship with cryptographic provenance; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 5.1/10; 100% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-09-22. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

How MCP AutoMem compares in MCP Servers

  1. #141 Cronometer Api MCP 74.2 +0.1
  2. #142 MCP Jira Stdio 74.2 +0.1
  3. #143 MCP AutoMem 74.1 this agent
  4. #144 Monarch MCP Server 74.1 ±0
  5. #145 Freshcontext MCP 73.9 −0.2

Bars show each HVTrust score; the tick marks MCP AutoMem’s 74.1.

Where the 74.1 comes from

HVTrust dimensions vs the MCP Servers average

74.1 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

MCP AutoMem MCP Servers average (775 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits
18.9 / 25
8.6 above avg 10.3
Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance
18.0 / 18
4.6 above avg 13.4
Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard
12.8 / 17
0.6 above avg 12.2
Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity
11.7 / 20
in line with avg 12.0
AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads
7.0 / 20
in line with avg 7.2

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It
Improve adoption to lift the weakest part of the trust profile.
Recent Changes
2026-09-25
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 12 spots (#226 → #238)
2026-09-23
Tool Surface Changed
Detected tool/plugin surface changed: none → declared
2026-09-23
Provider Added
Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: Anthropic
Maintainer Checklist
Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 5.1/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.
41.1
Activity sub-score · out of 100
#143

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade B reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage B is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (3 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Signals refreshed 2026-09-26 12:32 UTC · Repo last pushed 4 days ago

Rank Trend

2026-08-11 2026-09-26

Activity & Reach

Stars
65
Forks
15
Last Push
2026-09-22
4 days ago
Commits (4 wk)
0?
Downloads (7d)
92
npm
HN mentions (30d)
—
Open Issues
6
Rank Change
▼2
was #238

Analysis

Activity Inputs

41.1 / 100
StarsRepository reach
10.9 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
24.4 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
0.0 / 25
CommunityFork signal
5.6 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance
Verified
npm attestation
OSSF Scorecard
5.1 / 10
OpenSSF Scorecard · scanned Sep 26, 2026
Signed Commits
100%
of last 100 commits verified
Binary-Artifacts 10
Branch-Protection 3
CI-Tests 10
CII-Best-Practices 0
Code-Review 0
Contributors 10
Dangerous-Workflow 10
Dependency-Update-Tool 10
Fuzzing 0
License 10
Maintained 10
Packaging 10
Pinned-Dependencies 3
SAST 10
Security-Policy 0
Signed-Releases 0
Token-Permissions 0
Vulnerabilities 0

Common questions about MCP AutoMem

MCP AutoMem has a mixed signal profile. Some trust indicators are present, others are missing. Whether it is safe for your use case depends on which gaps matter to you — review the breakdown below before adopting in production.
Does MCP AutoMem publish package provenance?
Yes. MCP AutoMem's package releases carry build provenance attestations, which cryptographically link the published package back to its source repository and CI workflow.
Does MCP AutoMem have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
MCP AutoMem has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 5.1/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.
Is MCP AutoMem actively maintained?
Actively maintained. The repository was pushed to within the last 4 day(s).
What license does MCP AutoMem use?
MCP AutoMem ships under MIT. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are MCP AutoMem's commits signed?
100% of the last 100 commits to MCP AutoMem are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface
Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support
high confidence
Implemented
MCP AutoMem appears to expose MCP server capabilities.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
External Service Dependencies
medium confidence
1 detected
Public provider/service dependencies detected.
Credential signal: No explicit API-key/config marker detected.
Tool / Plugin Surface
high confidence
Declared
Declared plugin/integration surface detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
high confidence
Match
Published package metadata matches the tracked repo
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
  • MCP signal live
  • External deps live
  • Tool / plugin surface live
  • Package provenance drift live
How this surface has changed

Detected changes to MCP AutoMem's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.

2026-09-23
Tool Surface Changed
Detected tool/plugin surface changed: none → declared
2026-09-23
Provider Added
Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: Anthropic
2026-09-23
Mcp Status Changed
Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented
2026-09-23
Provenance Added
Package provenance attestation detected

Maintain MCP AutoMem?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores MCP AutoMem from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Reputation Timeline

Signal history
Rank 20Grade 6HVTrust 3Listed 2Score 2Scorecard 1Delisted 1Provenance 1MCP 1Surface 1Surface 1
2026-09-25
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 12 spots (#226 → #238)
2026-09-23
Tool Surface Changed
Detected tool/plugin surface changed: none → declared
2026-09-23
Provider Added
Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: Anthropic
2026-09-23
Mcp Status Changed
Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented
2026-09-23
Provenance Added
Package provenance attestation detected
2026-09-23
Grade Changed
Trust grade D → B
2026-09-23
Rank Moved
Rank rose 619 spots (#845 → #226)
2026-09-23
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 46.9pts (28.0 → 74.9)
2026-09-23
Activity Score Changed
Activity score down 10pts (55 → 45)
2026-09-22
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #845
2026-09-21
Removed From Active Tracking
Removed from active tracking
2026-09-17
Grade Changed
Trust grade A → B
2026-09-16
Grade Changed
Trust grade B → A
2026-09-15
Grade Changed
Trust grade A → B
2026-09-07
Grade Changed
Trust grade C → A
2026-09-07
Rank Moved
Rank rose 624 spots (#755 → #131)
2026-09-07
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 26.7pts (53.4 → 80.1)
2026-09-06
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 13 spots (#742 → #755)
2026-09-05
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 65 spots (#677 → #742)
2026-09-04
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 52 spots (#625 → #677)
2026-09-03
Rank Moved
Rank rose 38 spots (#663 → #625)
2026-09-02
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 32 spots (#631 → #663)
2026-09-01
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 25 spots (#606 → #631)
2026-08-31
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 31 spots (#575 → #606)
2026-08-29
Scorecard Added
OSSF Scorecard: 5.6/10
2026-08-29
Grade Changed
Trust grade D → C
2026-08-29
Rank Moved
Rank rose 122 spots (#691 → #569)
2026-08-29
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 7.9pts (44.3 → 52.2)
2026-08-28
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 25 spots (#666 → #691)
2026-08-27
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 16 spots (#650 → #666)
2026-08-26
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 100 spots (#550 → #650)
2026-08-24
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 15 spots (#535 → #550)
2026-08-23
Rank Moved
Rank rose 16 spots (#551 → #535)
2026-08-23
Activity Score Changed
Activity score up 6pts (54 → 59)
2026-08-22
Rank Moved
Rank rose 11 spots (#562 → #551)
2026-08-20
Rank Moved
Rank rose 15 spots (#579 → #564)
2026-08-13
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 12 spots (#561 → #573)
2026-08-10
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 21 spots (#547 → #568)
2026-08-08
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #547

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers
HVTrust 74.1 Grade B
Markdown:
[![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/mcp-automem.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/mcp-automem)
HTML:
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/mcp-automem"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/mcp-automem.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in MCP Servers

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · npm Registry (downloads, provenance) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON