Is CloakBrowser MCP safe to use?

CloakBrowser MCP has an HVTrust score of 81.7/100 (Grade A), ranked #66 of 1283 tracked AI agent projects. This score reflects verifiable supply-chain integrity, transparency, maintenance, and adoption signals.

What is the trust score for CloakBrowser MCP?

CloakBrowser MCP scores 81.7/100 on HVTracker's evidence-weighted HVTrust scale. It has 37 GitHub stars and is categorized under MCP Servers.

CloakBrowser MCP

swimmwatch/cloakbrowser-mcp

⚡ CloakBrowser MCP server for AI agents: Playwright-powered browsing, clean tool forwarding, Docker support, and multi-s

MCP Servers TypeScript Grade A Listed MIT

81.7/100

Rank #66 of 1283

Compare CloakBrowser MCP

How does it stack up against its MCP Servers neighbours?

Pick any agent to compare →

Strong public trust posture, backed by multiple independent signals.

Open compare tool Suggest correction

Listing state

Listed

Evidence coverage

Grade B · 3/5 signals

Last push

2026-08-10 · 2d ago

Recent change

New

Is CloakBrowser MCP safe? CloakBrowser MCP scores 81.7/100 (Grade A), ranked #66 of 1283 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage B (3 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: its packages ship with cryptographic provenance; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 6.9/10; 63% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-08-10. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

Ranked neighbours in MCP Servers

#6 Kubernetes MCP Server — 85.0 (A) → #7 KiCad MCP Pro — 83.7 (A) → #9 Notion MCP Server — 80.7 (A) → #10 LinkedIn MCP Server — 77.1 (B) →

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It

Improve adoption to lift the weakest part of the trust profile.

Recent Changes

2026-08-08

Newly Listed

First tracked at rank #64

Maintainer Checklist

Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 6.9/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.

Compare with Codebase Memory MCP Get email alerts for CloakBrowser MCP View MCP Servers Report missing data

53.1

Activity sub-score · out of 100

In MCP Servers

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade A reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage B is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (3 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Rank Trend

2026-08-11 2026-08-12

Activity & Reach

Stars

Forks

Last Push

2026-08-10

2 days ago

Commits (4 wk)

Downloads (7d)

405

npm

HN mentions (30d)

—

Open Issues

Rank Change

was #66

Analysis

HVTrust Dimensions vs MCP Servers

81.7 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

CloakBrowser MCP MCP Servers average (761 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits

19.3 / 25

14.3 above avg 5.0

Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance

18.0 / 18

4.7 above avg 13.3

Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard

14.4 / 17

5.6 above avg 8.8

Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity

17.0 / 20

4.6 above avg 12.4

AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads

7.3 / 20

1.5 above avg 5.8

Activity Inputs

53.1 / 100

StarsRepository reach

9.5 / 30

FreshnessLast push recency

24.7 / 25

ActivityRecent commits

15.9 / 25

CommunityFork signal

2.8 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance

Verified

npm attestation

OSSF Scorecard

6.9 / 10

OpenSSF Scorecard · scanned Aug 8, 2026

Signed Commits

63%

of last 100 commits verified

Dependency-Update-Tool 10

Code-Review 0

Security-Policy 10

Maintained 0

Dangerous-Workflow 10

Token-Permissions 10

Pinned-Dependencies 10

Binary-Artifacts 10

CII-Best-Practices 0

License 10

Packaging 10

Fuzzing 10

SAST 10

Branch-Protection 0

Signed-Releases -1

Vulnerabilities 6

Contributors 3

CI-Tests 10

Is CloakBrowser MCP safe?

Public supply-chain signals for CloakBrowser MCP are strong: it has multiple independent trust indicators in place. This does not replace your own security review, but CloakBrowser MCP carries less obvious unverified-evidence risk than projects with thin signals.

Does CloakBrowser MCP publish package provenance?

Yes. CloakBrowser MCP's package releases carry build provenance attestations, which cryptographically link the published package back to its source repository and CI workflow.

Does CloakBrowser MCP have an OpenSSF Scorecard?

CloakBrowser MCP has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 6.9/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.

Is CloakBrowser MCP actively maintained?

Actively maintained. The repository was pushed to within the last 2 day(s).

What license does CloakBrowser MCP use?

CloakBrowser MCP ships under MIT. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.

Are CloakBrowser MCP's commits signed?

63% of the last 100 commits to CloakBrowser MCP are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

Compare CloakBrowser MCP head-to-head

CloakBrowser MCP vs Codebase Memory MCP → CloakBrowser MCP vs Playwright MCP → CloakBrowser MCP vs Apify MCP Server →

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface

Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support

high confidence

Implemented

CloakBrowser MCP appears to expose MCP server capabilities.

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

External Service Dependencies

None detected

No clear third-party provider dependency detected.

Credential signal: No explicit API-key/config marker detected.

Tool / Plugin Surface

high confidence

1 tags

Broad capability areas detected.

browser

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

Package Provenance Drift

high confidence

Match

Published package metadata matches the tracked repo

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

MCP signal live
External deps live
Tool / plugin surface live
Package provenance drift live

Maintain CloakBrowser MCP?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores CloakBrowser MCP from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Submit a correction → Add the trust badge

Reputation Timeline

Signal history

2026-08-08

Newly Listed

First tracked at rank #64

GitHub → npm: cloakbrowser-mcp

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers

Markdown:
            [![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/cloakbrowser-mcp.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/cloakbrowser-mcp)
            
HTML:
            <a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/cloakbrowser-mcp"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/cloakbrowser-mcp.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in MCP Servers

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · npm Registry (downloads, provenance) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON