updated 2026-09-04 23:32 UTC

Linux MCP Server

rhel-lightspeed/linux-mcp-server

Tools to allow LLM clients to interact with Linux systems remotely

MCP Servers Python Grade A Listed Apache-2.0
82.9/100
Rank #71 of 1320
Compare Linux MCP Server

How does it stack up against its MCP Servers neighbours?

Pick any agent to compare →

Strong public trust posture, backed by multiple independent signals.

Open compare tool Suggest correction
Listing state
Listed
Evidence coverage
Grade B · 3/5 signals
Last push
2026-09-04 · 0d ago
Recent change
Provider Removed

Is Linux MCP Server safe? Linux MCP Server scores 82.9/100 (Grade A), ranked #71 of 1320 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage B (3 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: its packages ship with cryptographic provenance; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 7.0/10; 100% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-09-04. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

Ranked neighbours in MCP Servers

#17 Stripe Agent Toolkit — 84.5 (A) → #18 Browserstack MCP Server — 83.6 (A) → #20 Auth0 MCP Server — 82.9 (A) → #21 Markdown Vault MCP — 82.8 (A) →

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It
Improve adoption to lift the weakest part of the trust profile.
Recent Changes
2026-09-03
Provider Removed
Runtime surface shrank — no longer detected: Google Gemini, Multi-provider (LiteLLM)
2026-08-26
Scorecard Added
OSSF Scorecard: 7.0/10
2026-08-26
Grade Changed
Trust grade B → A
Maintainer Checklist
Keep signals current Trust posture is already in a healthy range. The main job is to keep provenance, maintenance, and public evidence fresh.
Compare with another agent Get email alerts for Linux MCP Server View MCP Servers Report missing data
65.4
Activity sub-score · out of 100
#19
In MCP Servers

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade A reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage B is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (3 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Signals refreshed 2026-09-04 23:32 UTC · Repo last pushed today

Rank Trend

2026-08-11 2026-09-04

Activity & Reach

Stars
292
Forks
62
Last Push
2026-09-04
today
Commits (4 wk)
23
Downloads (7d)
952
pypi
HN mentions (30d)
—
Open Issues
12
Rank Change
▼1
was #70

Analysis

HVTrust Dimensions vs MCP Servers

82.9 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

Linux MCP Server MCP Servers average (778 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits
21.2 / 25
11.6 above avg 9.6
Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance
18.0 / 18
4.6 above avg 13.4
Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard
14.4 / 17
2.6 above avg 11.8
Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity
17.5 / 20
5.3 above avg 12.2
AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads
9.9 / 20
3.6 above avg 6.3

Activity Inputs

65.4 / 100
StarsRepository reach
14.8 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
25.0 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
17.2 / 25
CommunityFork signal
8.4 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance
Verified
pypi attestation
OSSF Scorecard
7.0 / 10
OpenSSF Scorecard · scanned Sep 4, 2026
Signed Commits
100%
of last 100 commits verified
Binary-Artifacts 10
Branch-Protection 5
CI-Tests 10
CII-Best-Practices 0
Code-Review 10
Contributors 10
Dangerous-Workflow 10
Dependency-Update-Tool 10
Fuzzing 0
License 10
Maintained 10
Packaging 10
Pinned-Dependencies 9
SAST 6
Security-Policy 4
Signed-Releases 0
Token-Permissions 10
Vulnerabilities 0

Is Linux MCP Server safe?

Public supply-chain signals for Linux MCP Server are strong: it has multiple independent trust indicators in place. This does not replace your own security review, but Linux MCP Server carries less obvious unverified-evidence risk than projects with thin signals.
Does Linux MCP Server publish package provenance?
Yes. Linux MCP Server's package releases carry build provenance attestations, which cryptographically link the published package back to its source repository and CI workflow.
Does Linux MCP Server have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
Linux MCP Server has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 7.0/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.
Is Linux MCP Server actively maintained?
Actively maintained. The repository was pushed to within the last 1 day(s).
What license does Linux MCP Server use?
Linux MCP Server ships under Apache-2.0. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are Linux MCP Server's commits signed?
100% of the last 100 commits to Linux MCP Server are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface
Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support
high confidence
Implemented
Linux MCP Server appears to expose MCP server capabilities.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
External Service Dependencies
None detected
No clear third-party provider dependency detected.
Credential signal: No explicit API-key/config marker detected.
Tool / Plugin Surface
None detected
No clear plugin system or broad tool surface detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
low confidence
Unknown
Package source metadata is missing or inconclusive
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
  • MCP signal live
  • External deps live
  • Tool / plugin surface live
  • Package provenance drift live
How this surface has changed

Detected changes to Linux MCP Server's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.

2026-09-03
Provider Removed
Runtime surface shrank — no longer detected: Google Gemini, Multi-provider (LiteLLM)

Maintain Linux MCP Server?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores Linux MCP Server from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Submit a correction → Add the trust badge

Reputation Timeline

Signal history
Rank 6Listed 1HVTrust 1Grade 1Scorecard 1Surface 1
2026-09-03
Provider Removed
Runtime surface shrank — no longer detected: Google Gemini, Multi-provider (LiteLLM)
2026-08-26
Scorecard Added
OSSF Scorecard: 7.0/10
2026-08-26
Grade Changed
Trust grade B → A
2026-08-26
Rank Moved
Rank rose 118 spots (#191 → #73)
2026-08-26
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 14.2pts (67.4 → 81.6)
2026-08-22
Rank Moved
Rank rose 13 spots (#190 → #177)
2026-08-20
Rank Moved
Rank rose 11 spots (#197 → #186)
2026-08-17
Rank Moved
Rank rose 14 spots (#201 → #187)
2026-08-13
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 11 spots (#179 → #190)
2026-08-12
Rank Moved
Rank rose 12 spots (#191 → #179)
2026-08-08
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #181
GitHub → PyPI: linux-mcp-server

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers
HVTrust 82.9 Grade A
Markdown:
[![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/linux-mcp-server.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/linux-mcp-server)
HTML:
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/linux-mcp-server"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/linux-mcp-server.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in MCP Servers

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · PyPI / pypistats (downloads, provenance) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON