Is LanceDB safe to use?

LanceDB has an HVTrust score of 86.8/100 (Grade A), ranked #31 of 1308 tracked AI agent projects. This score reflects verifiable supply-chain integrity, transparency, maintenance, and adoption signals.

What is the trust score for LanceDB?

LanceDB scores 86.8/100 on HVTracker's evidence-weighted HVTrust scale. It has 11.3k GitHub stars and is categorized under Memory & Knowledge.

LanceDB

lancedb/lancedb

Developer-friendly OSS embedded retrieval library for multimodal AI. Search More; Manage Less.

Memory & Knowledge Rust Grade A Listed Apache-2.0

86.8/100

Rank #31 of 1308

Compare LanceDB

How does it stack up against its Memory & Knowledge neighbours?

Pick any agent to compare →

Strong public trust posture, backed by multiple independent signals.

Open compare tool Suggest correction

Listing state

Listed

Evidence coverage

Grade A · 4/5 signals

Last push

2026-08-25 · 0d ago

Recent change

No recent signal change

Is LanceDB safe? LanceDB scores 86.8/100 (Grade A), ranked #31 of 1308 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage A (4 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: its packages ship with cryptographic provenance; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 6.1/10; 86% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-08-25. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

Ranked neighbours in Memory & Knowledge

#1 Vespa — 87.8 (A) → #3 Mem0 — 86.2 (A) → #4 Graphiti — 85.7 (A) → #5 LightRAG — 84.0 (A) →

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It

Improve safety / integrity to lift the weakest part of the trust profile.

Maintainer Checklist

Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 6.1/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.

Compare with Vespa Get email alerts for LanceDB View Memory & Knowledge Report missing data

88.3

Activity sub-score · out of 100

In Memory & Knowledge

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade A reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage A is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (4 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Rank Trend

2026-08-11 2026-08-25

Activity & Reach

Stars

11.3k

Forks

1.0k

Last Push

2026-08-25

today

Commits (4 wk)

169

Downloads (7d)

1,604,486

pypi

HN mentions (30d)

Open Issues

472

Rank Change

was #31

Analysis

HVTrust Dimensions vs Memory & Knowledge

86.8 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

LanceDB Memory & Knowledge average (44 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits

19.4 / 25

9.4 above avg 10.0

Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance

18.0 / 18

5.9 above avg 12.1

Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard

13.7 / 17

1.3 above avg 12.4

Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity

20.0 / 20

2.4 above avg 17.6

AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads

18.0 / 20

4.4 above avg 13.6

Activity Inputs

88.3 / 100

StarsRepository reach

24.3 / 30

FreshnessLast push recency

25.0 / 25

ActivityRecent commits

25 / 25

CommunityFork signal

14.0 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance

Verified

pypi attestation

OSSF Scorecard

6.1 / 10

OpenSSF Scorecard · scanned Aug 24, 2026

Signed Commits

86%

of last 100 commits verified

Binary-Artifacts 10

Branch-Protection 6

CI-Tests 10

CII-Best-Practices 0

Code-Review 8

Contributors 10

Dangerous-Workflow 10

Dependency-Update-Tool 10

Fuzzing 0

License 10

Maintained 10

Packaging 10

Pinned-Dependencies 0

SAST 8

Security-Policy 0

Signed-Releases -1

Token-Permissions 0

Vulnerabilities 0

Is LanceDB safe?

Public supply-chain signals for LanceDB are strong: it has multiple independent trust indicators in place. This does not replace your own security review, but LanceDB carries less obvious unverified-evidence risk than projects with thin signals.

Does LanceDB publish package provenance?

Yes. LanceDB's package releases carry build provenance attestations, which cryptographically link the published package back to its source repository and CI workflow.

Does LanceDB have an OpenSSF Scorecard?

LanceDB has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 6.1/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.

Is LanceDB actively maintained?

Actively maintained. The repository was pushed to within the last 1 day(s).

What license does LanceDB use?

LanceDB ships under Apache-2.0. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.

Are LanceDB's commits signed?

86% of the last 100 commits to LanceDB are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

Compare LanceDB head-to-head

LanceDB vs Vespa → LanceDB vs Mem0 → LanceDB vs Graphiti →

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface

Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support

None detected

No MCP server signal detected.

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

External Service Dependencies

high confidence

5 detected

Public provider/service dependencies detected.

Credential signal: No explicit API-key/config marker detected.

Tool / Plugin Surface

high confidence

Declared

Declared plugin/integration surface detected.

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

Package Provenance Drift

low confidence

Unknown

Package source metadata is missing or inconclusive

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

MCP signal live
External deps live
Tool / plugin surface live
Package provenance drift live

How this surface has changed

Detected changes to LanceDB's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.

2026-05-28

Provenance Added

Package provenance attestation detected

Maintain LanceDB?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores LanceDB from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Submit a correction → Add the trust badge

Reputation Timeline

Signal history

2026-05-29

HVTrust Changed

HVTrust up 10.1pts (76.8 → 86.9)

2026-05-28

Provenance Added

Package provenance attestation detected

2026-05-28

Activity Score Changed

Activity score up 23pts (63 → 86)

GitHub → PyPI: lancedb

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers

Markdown:
            [![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/lancedb.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/lancedb)
            
HTML:
            <a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/lancedb"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/lancedb.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in Memory & Knowledge

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · PyPI / pypistats (downloads, provenance) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI · Algolia HN Search API
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON