updated 2026-09-16 07:03 UTC

Hindsight

vectorize-io/hindsight

Hindsight: Agent Memory That Learns

Memory & Knowledge Python Grade A Listed MIT
84.9/100
Rank #79 of 1328
Compare Hindsight

How does it stack up against its Memory & Knowledge neighbours?

Pick any agent to compare →

Strong public trust posture, backed by multiple independent signals.

Open compare tool Suggest correction
Listing state
Listed
Evidence coverage
Grade A · 4/5 signals
Last push
2026-09-15 · 1d ago
Recent change
No recent signal change

Is Hindsight safe? Hindsight scores 84.9/100 (Grade A), ranked #79 of 1328 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage A (4 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: its packages ship with cryptographic provenance; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 5.1/10; 92% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-09-15. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

Ranked neighbours in Memory & Knowledge

#4 Vespa — 86.1 (A) → #5 Mem0 — 85.6 (A) → #7 EverOS — 84.7 (A) → #8 Cognee — 83.3 (A) →

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It
Improve safety / integrity to lift the weakest part of the trust profile.
Recent Changes
2026-09-05
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 11 spots (#58 → #69)
2026-09-03
Mcp Status Changed
Detected MCP server support changed: declared → implemented
2026-09-03
Rank Moved
Rank rose 14 spots (#68 → #54)
Maintainer Checklist
Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 5.1/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.
Compare with ReMe Get email alerts for Hindsight View Memory & Knowledge Report missing data
91.4
Activity sub-score · out of 100
#6
In Memory & Knowledge

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade A reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage A is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (4 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Signals refreshed 2026-09-16 07:03 UTC · Repo last pushed yesterday

Rank Trend

2026-08-11 2026-09-16

Activity & Reach

Stars
23.8k
Forks
1.8k
Last Push
2026-09-15
yesterday
Commits (4 wk)
498
Downloads (7d)
14,374
pypi
HN mentions (30d)
0
Open Issues
51
Rank Change
▼2
was #77

Analysis

HVTrust Dimensions vs Memory & Knowledge

84.9 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

Hindsight Memory & Knowledge average (44 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits
18.5 / 25
7.0 above avg 11.5
Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance
18.0 / 18
5.6 above avg 12.4
Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard
12.8 / 17
in line with avg 12.9
Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity
19.9 / 20
2.7 above avg 17.2
AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads
16.0 / 20
2.5 above avg 13.5

Activity Inputs

91.4 / 100
StarsRepository reach
26.3 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
24.9 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
25 / 25
CommunityFork signal
15.1 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance
Verified
pypi attestation
OSSF Scorecard
5.1 / 10
OpenSSF Scorecard · scanned Sep 15, 2026
Signed Commits
92%
of last 100 commits verified
Binary-Artifacts 9
Branch-Protection 3
CI-Tests 6
CII-Best-Practices 0
Code-Review 4
Contributors 10
Dangerous-Workflow 10
Dependency-Update-Tool 10
Fuzzing 0
License 10
Maintained 10
Packaging 10
Pinned-Dependencies 1
SAST 0
Security-Policy 10
Signed-Releases 0
Token-Permissions 0
Vulnerabilities 0

Is Hindsight safe?

Public supply-chain signals for Hindsight are strong: it has multiple independent trust indicators in place. This does not replace your own security review, but Hindsight carries less obvious unverified-evidence risk than projects with thin signals.
Does Hindsight publish package provenance?
Yes. Hindsight's package releases carry build provenance attestations, which cryptographically link the published package back to its source repository and CI workflow.
Does Hindsight have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
Hindsight has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 5.1/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.
Is Hindsight actively maintained?
Actively maintained. The repository was pushed to within the last 1 day(s).
What license does Hindsight use?
Hindsight ships under MIT. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are Hindsight's commits signed?
92% of the last 100 commits to Hindsight are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

Compare Hindsight head-to-head

Hindsight vs ReMe → Hindsight vs OpenViking → Hindsight vs Graphiti →

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface
Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support
high confidence
Implemented
Hindsight appears to expose MCP server capabilities.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
External Service Dependencies
high confidence
2 detected
Public provider/service dependencies detected.
Credential signal: API keys or service config markers documented.
Tool / Plugin Surface
high confidence
Declared
Declared plugin/integration surface detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
low confidence
Unknown
Package source metadata is missing or inconclusive
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
  • MCP signal live
  • External deps live
  • Tool / plugin surface live
  • Package provenance drift live
How this surface has changed

Detected changes to Hindsight's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.

2026-09-03
Mcp Status Changed
Detected MCP server support changed: declared → implemented

Maintain Hindsight?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores Hindsight from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Submit a correction → Add the trust badge

Reputation Timeline

Signal history
Rank 4HVTrust 1Grade 1Scorecard 1MCP 1
2026-09-05
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 11 spots (#58 → #69)
2026-09-03
Mcp Status Changed
Detected MCP server support changed: declared → implemented
2026-09-03
Rank Moved
Rank rose 14 spots (#68 → #54)
2026-08-31
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 10 spots (#64 → #74)
2026-06-19
Scorecard Added
OSSF Scorecard: 5.1/10
2026-06-19
Grade Changed
Trust grade C → A
2026-06-19
Rank Moved
Rank rose 132 spots (#161 → #29)
2026-06-19
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 33.5pts (51.4 → 84.9)
GitHub → PyPI: hindsight-api-slim

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers
HVTrust 84.9 Grade A
Markdown:
[![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/hindsight.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/hindsight)
HTML:
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/hindsight"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/hindsight.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in Memory & Knowledge

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · PyPI / pypistats (downloads, provenance) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI · Algolia HN Search API
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON