Registry › Compare › Hindsight vs OpenViking

Hindsight vs OpenViking

Both are Grade A and 2.3 points apart, so choose on what you weigh most. Hindsight rests on broader evidence; OpenViking leads on supply-chain integrity and transparency. Note: OpenViking's evidence coverage is thinner (coverage B vs A) — its score rests on fewer independent signal types.

A Hindsight 85.7

Hindsight: Agent Memory That Learns

vectorize-io/hindsight · #84 overall · #8 Memory & Knowledge · coverage A (4/5)

Choose Hindsight if breadth of evidence matters most.

A vs BEvidence coverage: 4 of 5 independent signal types, against 3

A OpenViking 88.0

Self-evolving Context Database for AI Agents. Unify Agent Memory, Knowledge RAG and Skills.

volcengine/OpenViking · #51 overall · #1 Memory & Knowledge · coverage B (3/5)

Choose OpenViking if supply-chain integrity and transparency matter most.

+2.2Safety / Integrity: 100% of recent commits signed, against 91%
+1.1Transparency: OSSF Scorecard 6.4 against 5.0
+0.7Adoption: 112.8k weekly downloads against 21.3k

Where they differ

18.3

Safety / IntegrityOpenViking +2.2

20.5

12.8

TransparencyOpenViking +1.1

13.9

19.9

MaintenanceOpenViking +0.1

20.0

17.1

AdoptionOpenViking +0.7

17.8

-0.4

Runtime calibrationHindsight +1.8

-2.2

1 dimension identical: Identity 18.0 · Full evidence table

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Hindsight and OpenViking, two Memory & Knowledge projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Full evidence

Signal	Hindsightvectorize-io/hindsight	OpenVikingvolcengine/OpenViking
HVTrust score	85.7	88.0
Evidence grade	A	A
Coverage grade	A	B
Overall rank	#84	#51
Rank in Memory & Knowledge	#8	#1
GitHub stars	51.2k	40.2k
Last updated	1d ago	today
Build provenance	Yes	Yes
OSSF Scorecard	5.0 / 10	6.4 / 10
License	MIT	AGPL-3.0
Downloads	21k/wk	113k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25	18.3	20.5
Identity & provenance / 18	18.0	18.0
Transparency / 17	12.8	13.9
Maintenance / 20	19.9	20.0
Adoption / 20	17.1	17.8
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server	Implemented	Declared
External providers	2 — Anthropic, OpenAI	9 — Amazon Bedrock, Anthropic, Firecrawl, …
Requires API keys	Yes	No
Plugin surface	plugins	plugins
Provenance drift	Unknown	Match

Open in the live compare tool → Hindsight profile OpenViking profile More Memory & Knowledge →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.4 →