LanceDB vs zvec-grep
Both are Grade A and 0.6 points apart, so choose on what you weigh most. LanceDB leads on supply-chain integrity and adoption, and rests on broader evidence.
Developer-friendly OSS embedded retrieval library for multimodal AI. Search More; Manage Less.
Choose LanceDB if supply-chain integrity and adoption matter most.
- +4.6Adoption: 1.8M weekly downloads against 3.6k
- +0.5Safety / Integrity: OSSF Scorecard 6.1 against 5.6
- A vs BEvidence coverage: 4 of 5 independent signal types, against 3
Local-first search across your workspace, built for humans and AI agents.
zvec-grep doesn't lead on any scored dimension in this pair.
Where they differ
2 dimensions identical: Identity 18.0 · Maintenance 20.0 · Full evidence table
An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of LanceDB and zvec-grep, two Memory & Knowledge projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.
Full evidence
| Signal | LanceDBlancedb/lancedb | zvec-grepzvec-ai/zvec-grep |
|---|---|---|
| HVTrust score | 88.0 | 87.4 |
| Evidence grade | A | A |
| Coverage grade | A | B |
| Overall rank | #61 | #70 |
| Rank in Memory & Knowledge | #3 | #6 |
| GitHub stars | 11.8k | 4.2k |
| Last updated | today | today |
| Build provenance | Yes | Yes |
| OSSF Scorecard | 6.1 / 10 | 5.6 / 10 |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Downloads | 1.8M/wk | 4k/wk |
| Trust dimensions (points earned) | ||
| Safety / integrity / 25 | 20.0 | 19.5 |
| Identity & provenance / 18 | 18.0 | 18.0 |
| Transparency / 17 | 13.7 | 13.3 |
| Maintenance / 20 | 20.0 | 20.0 |
| Adoption / 20 | 18.1 | 13.5 |
| Runtime capability surface (full matrix) | ||
| MCP server | — | Declared |
| External providers | 4 — Amazon Bedrock, Cohere, Google Gemini, … | 1 — Multi-provider (LiteLLM) |
| Requires API keys | No | No |
| Plugin surface | plugins | — |
| Provenance drift | Unknown | Match |
How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.4 →