Korean Law MCP

법제처 국가법령정보를 LLM에서 바로 조회하는 MCP 서버. 법령·판례·조례 검색과 인용 검증 | MCP server for Korean law — search statutes, precedents, and ordinances, and verify citations

MCP Servers TypeScript Listed MIT

Is Korean Law MCP safe? Promising trust profile, but some evidence still deserves review.

OSSF Scorecard 4.8 / 10
Provenance None
Signed commits 4%
Last push 3d ago
Compare Korean Law MCP
Suggest a correction

In detail: Korean Law MCP scores 64.7/100 (Grade C), ranked #485 of 1325 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage B (3 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 4.8/10; 4% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-09-23. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

How Korean Law MCP compares in MCP Servers

  1. #278 Ghidra MCP 64.7 ±0
  2. #279 Claude Faf MCP 64.7 ±0
  3. #280 Korean Law MCP 64.7 this agent
  4. #281 MCP Image 64.6 −0.1
  5. #282 Mapbox MCP Server 64.6 −0.1

Bars show each HVTrust score; the tick marks Korean Law MCP’s 64.7.

Where the 64.7 comes from

HVTrust dimensions vs the MCP Servers average

64.7 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

Korean Law MCP MCP Servers average (775 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits
6.2 / 25
4.1 below avg 10.3
Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance
10.8 / 18
2.6 below avg 13.4
Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard
12.6 / 17
in line with avg 12.2
Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity
17.9 / 20
5.8 above avg 12.1
AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads
12.5 / 20
5.3 above avg 7.2

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It
Publish package provenance or release attestations for stronger supply-chain evidence.
Recent Changes
2026-09-25
Grade Changed
Trust grade B → C
2026-09-25
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 63 spots (#420 → #483)
2026-09-23
Tool Surface Changed
Detected tool/plugin surface changed: none → declared
Maintainer Checklist
Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 4.8/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.
Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.
Increase signed commits Raise the share of verified-signed commits to make maintainer identity and release history easier to trust.
76.9
Activity sub-score · out of 100
#280

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade C reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage B is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (3 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Signals refreshed 2026-09-26 20:12 UTC · Repo last pushed 3 days ago

Rank Trend

2026-08-11 2026-09-26

Activity & Reach

Stars
2.6k
Forks
530
Last Push
2026-09-23
3 days ago
Commits (4 wk)
33
Downloads (7d)
1,542
npm
HN mentions (30d)
—
Open Issues
0
Rank Change
▼2
was #483

Analysis

Activity Inputs

76.9 / 100
StarsRepository reach
20.5 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
24.6 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
19.1 / 25
CommunityFork signal
12.7 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance
None
No package attestations found
OSSF Scorecard
4.8 / 10
OpenSSF Scorecard · scanned Sep 25, 2026
Signed Commits
4%
of last 100 commits verified
Binary-Artifacts 10
Branch-Protection 0
CI-Tests 0
CII-Best-Practices 0
Code-Review 0
Contributors 10
Dangerous-Workflow 10
Dependency-Update-Tool 0
Fuzzing 0
License 10
Maintained 10
Packaging 10
Pinned-Dependencies 8
SAST 0
Security-Policy 0
Signed-Releases -1
Token-Permissions 0
Vulnerabilities 10

Common questions about Korean Law MCP

Korean Law MCP has a mixed signal profile. Some trust indicators are present, others are missing. Whether it is safe for your use case depends on which gaps matter to you — review the breakdown below before adopting in production.
Does Korean Law MCP publish package provenance?
No published build provenance is currently detected for Korean Law MCP. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.
Does Korean Law MCP have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
Korean Law MCP has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 4.8/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.
Is Korean Law MCP actively maintained?
Actively maintained. The repository was pushed to within the last 3 day(s).
What license does Korean Law MCP use?
Korean Law MCP ships under MIT. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are Korean Law MCP's commits signed?
4% of the last 100 commits to Korean Law MCP are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface
Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support
high confidence
Implemented
Korean Law MCP appears to expose MCP server capabilities.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
External Service Dependencies
high confidence
1 detected
Public provider/service dependencies detected.
Credential signal: API keys or service config markers documented.
Tool / Plugin Surface
high confidence
Declared
Declared plugin/integration surface detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
high confidence
Match
Published package metadata matches the tracked repo
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
  • MCP signal live
  • External deps live
  • Tool / plugin surface live
  • Package provenance drift live
How this surface has changed

Detected changes to Korean Law MCP's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.

2026-09-23
Tool Surface Changed
Detected tool/plugin surface changed: none → declared
2026-09-23
Provider Added
Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: Anthropic
2026-09-23
Mcp Status Changed
Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented
2026-09-02
Tool Surface Changed
Detected tool/plugin surface changed: marketplace → declared

Maintain Korean Law MCP?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores Korean Law MCP from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Reputation Timeline

Signal history
Rank 17Grade 5HVTrust 4Listed 2Surface 2Scorecard 1Score 1Delisted 1MCP 1Surface 1
2026-09-25
Grade Changed
Trust grade B → C
2026-09-25
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 63 spots (#420 → #483)
2026-09-23
Tool Surface Changed
Detected tool/plugin surface changed: none → declared
2026-09-23
Provider Added
Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: Anthropic
2026-09-23
Mcp Status Changed
Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented
2026-09-23
Grade Changed
Trust grade D → B
2026-09-23
Rank Moved
Rank rose 230 spots (#650 → #420)
2026-09-23
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 34.2pts (32.3 → 66.5)
2026-09-22
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #650
2026-09-21
Removed From Active Tracking
Removed from active tracking
2026-09-20
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 20 spots (#441 → #461)
2026-09-18
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 13 spots (#419 → #432)
2026-09-15
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 63 spots (#347 → #410)
2026-09-15
Activity Score Changed
Activity score down 7pts (83 → 76)
2026-09-07
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 21 spots (#330 → #351)
2026-09-05
Grade Changed
Trust grade D → B
2026-09-05
Rank Moved
Rank rose 620 spots (#951 → #331)
2026-09-05
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 23.3pts (44.0 → 67.3)
2026-09-04
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 24 spots (#927 → #951)
2026-09-03
Grade Changed
Trust grade B → D
2026-09-03
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 696 spots (#231 → #927)
2026-09-03
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust down 24.3pts (68.3 → 44.0)
2026-09-02
Tool Surface Changed
Detected tool/plugin surface changed: marketplace → declared
2026-09-02
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 21 spots (#210 → #231)
2026-08-31
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 26 spots (#178 → #204)
2026-08-30
Scorecard Added
OSSF Scorecard: 5.8/10
2026-08-30
Grade Changed
Trust grade D → B
2026-08-30
Rank Moved
Rank rose 642 spots (#820 → #178)
2026-08-30
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 29.6pts (40.3 → 69.9)
2026-08-29
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 36 spots (#784 → #820)
2026-08-28
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 25 spots (#759 → #784)
2026-08-27
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 25 spots (#734 → #759)
2026-08-26
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 98 spots (#636 → #734)
2026-08-16
Rank Moved
Rank rose 11 spots (#641 → #630)
2026-08-10
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #637

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers
HVTrust 64.7 Grade C
Markdown:
[![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/korean-law-mcp.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/korean-law-mcp)
HTML:
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/korean-law-mcp"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/korean-law-mcp.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in MCP Servers

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · npm Registry (downloads, provenance) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON