Korean Law MCP
법제처 국가법령정보를 LLM에서 바로 조회하는 MCP 서버. 법령·판례·조례 검색과 인용 검증 | MCP server for Korean law — search statutes, precedents, and ordinances, and verify citations
Is Korean Law MCP safe? Promising trust profile, but some evidence still deserves review.
Compare Korean Law MCP
How does it stack up against its MCP Servers neighbours?
Pick any agent to compare →In detail: Korean Law MCP scores 64.7/100 (Grade C), ranked #485 of 1325 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage B (3 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 4.8/10; 4% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-09-23. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →
How Korean Law MCP compares in MCP Servers
- #278 Ghidra MCP 64.7 ±0
- #279 Claude Faf MCP 64.7 ±0
- #280 Korean Law MCP 64.7 this agent
- #281 MCP Image 64.6 −0.1
- #282 Mapbox MCP Server 64.6 −0.1
Bars show each HVTrust score; the tick marks Korean Law MCP’s 64.7.
Where the 64.7 comes from
HVTrust dimensions vs the MCP Servers average
64.7 / 100 · 100.0% confidenceKorean Law MCP MCP Servers average (775 agents)
Quick Trust Read
How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade C reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage B is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (3 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →
Rank Trend
Activity & Reach
Analysis
Activity Inputs
76.9 / 100Supply Chain Trust
Common questions about Korean Law MCP
Does Korean Law MCP publish package provenance?
Does Korean Law MCP have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
Is Korean Law MCP actively maintained?
What license does Korean Law MCP use?
Are Korean Law MCP's commits signed?
Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.
AI agent surface
MCP, providers, tool surface
These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →
- MCP signal live
- External deps live
- Tool / plugin surface live
- Package provenance drift live
Detected changes to Korean Law MCP's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.
Maintain Korean Law MCP?
For maintainers
HVTrust scores Korean Law MCP from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.
Reputation Timeline
Signal history
Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →
For maintainers
[](https://hvtracker.net/agents/korean-law-mcp)
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/korean-law-mcp"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/korean-law-mcp.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>
Other agents in MCP Servers
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · npm Registry (downloads, provenance) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON