Gmc MCP
The first free, open-source, self-hosted MCP server for Google Merchant Center (GMC). 126 tools over Merchant API v1 — products, inventory, reports, promotions, returns, account config, audit log + rollback, dry-run. Free alternative to paid SaaS (Adzviser, Catchr, Windsor.ai, Pipedream).
Is Gmc MCP safe? Thin or incomplete trust evidence. Review carefully before production use.
Compare Gmc MCP
How does it stack up against its MCP Servers neighbours?
Pick any agent to compare →In detail: Gmc MCP scores 54.8/100 (Grade C), ranked #793 of 1325 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage B (3 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: its packages ship with cryptographic provenance; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 3.4/10; recent commits are unsigned; last pushed 2026-05-02. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →
How Gmc MCP compares in MCP Servers
- #439 Paper Distill MCP 54.8 ±0
- #440 Vaaya 54.8 ±0
- #441 Gmc MCP 54.8 this agent
- #442 Fr24api MCP 54.7 −0.1
- #443 Happy Platform MCP 54.6 −0.2
Bars show each HVTrust score; the tick marks Gmc MCP’s 54.8.
Where the 54.8 comes from
HVTrust dimensions vs the MCP Servers average
54.8 / 100 · 100.0% confidenceGmc MCP MCP Servers average (775 agents)
Quick Trust Read
How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade C reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage B is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (3 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →
Rank Trend
Activity & Reach
Analysis
Activity Inputs
14.7 / 100Supply Chain Trust
Common questions about Gmc MCP
Does Gmc MCP publish package provenance?
Does Gmc MCP have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
Is Gmc MCP actively maintained?
What license does Gmc MCP use?
Are Gmc MCP's commits signed?
Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.
AI agent surface
MCP, providers, tool surface
These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →
- MCP signal live
- External deps live
- Tool / plugin surface live
- Package provenance drift live
Detected changes to Gmc MCP's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.
Maintain Gmc MCP?
For maintainers
HVTrust scores Gmc MCP from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.
Reputation Timeline
Signal history
Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →
For maintainers
[](https://hvtracker.net/agents/gmc-mcp)
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/gmc-mcp"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/gmc-mcp.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>
Other agents in MCP Servers
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · PyPI / pypistats (downloads, provenance) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON