Streamdeck MCP

MCP server for Elgato Stream Deck control — set buttons, manage pages, wire actions

MCP Servers Python Grade B Listed MIT
71.0/100
Rank #206 of 1320
Compare Streamdeck MCP

Promising trust profile, but some evidence still deserves review.

Open compare tool Suggest correction
Listing state
Listed
Evidence coverage
Grade B · 3/5 signals
Last push
2026-08-12 · 23d ago
Recent change
Rank +5

Is Streamdeck MCP safe? Streamdeck MCP scores 71.0/100 (Grade B), ranked #206 of 1320 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage B (3 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: its packages ship with cryptographic provenance; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 4.7/10; 79% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-08-12. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

Ranked neighbours in MCP Servers

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It
Improve adoption to lift the weakest part of the trust profile.
Recent Changes
2026-09-03
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 10 spots (#191 → #201)
2026-08-31
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 27 spots (#156 → #183)
2026-08-29
Scorecard Added
OSSF Scorecard: 4.7/10
Maintainer Checklist
Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 4.7/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.
36.7
Activity sub-score · out of 100
#102

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade B reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage B is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (3 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Signals refreshed 2026-09-04 23:32 UTC · Repo last pushed 23 days ago

Rank Trend

2026-08-11 2026-09-04

Activity & Reach

Stars
41
Forks
12
Last Push
2026-08-12
23 days ago
Commits (4 wk)
0
Downloads (7d)
213
pypi
HN mentions (30d)
Open Issues
1
Rank Change
▼5
was #201

Analysis

HVTrust Dimensions vs MCP Servers

71.0 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

Streamdeck MCP MCP Servers average (778 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits
17.3 / 25
7.7 above avg 9.6
Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance
18.0 / 18
4.6 above avg 13.4
Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard
12.5 / 17
0.7 above avg 11.8
Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity
10.5 / 20
1.7 below avg 12.2
AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads
7.0 / 20
0.7 above avg 6.3

Activity Inputs

36.7 / 100
StarsRepository reach
9.7 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
21.8 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
0.0 / 25
CommunityFork signal
5.2 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance
Verified
pypi attestation
OSSF Scorecard
4.7 / 10
OpenSSF Scorecard · scanned Sep 3, 2026
Signed Commits
79%
of last 100 commits verified
Binary-Artifacts 10
Branch-Protection 3
CI-Tests 10
CII-Best-Practices 0
Code-Review 1
Contributors 10
Dangerous-Workflow 10
Dependency-Update-Tool 10
Fuzzing 0
License 10
Maintained 3
Packaging 10
Pinned-Dependencies 3
SAST 10
Security-Policy 0
Signed-Releases 0
Token-Permissions 0
Vulnerabilities 0

Is Streamdeck MCP safe?

Streamdeck MCP has a mixed signal profile. Some trust indicators are present, others are missing. Whether it is safe for your use case depends on which gaps matter to you — review the breakdown below before adopting in production.
Does Streamdeck MCP publish package provenance?
Yes. Streamdeck MCP's package releases carry build provenance attestations, which cryptographically link the published package back to its source repository and CI workflow.
Does Streamdeck MCP have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
Streamdeck MCP has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 4.7/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.
Is Streamdeck MCP actively maintained?
Maintained. Last push was 23 days ago.
What license does Streamdeck MCP use?
Streamdeck MCP ships under MIT. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are Streamdeck MCP's commits signed?
78% of the last 100 commits to Streamdeck MCP are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface
Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support
medium confidence
Implemented
Streamdeck MCP appears to expose MCP server capabilities.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
External Service Dependencies
None detected
No clear third-party provider dependency detected.
Credential signal: No explicit API-key/config marker detected.
Tool / Plugin Surface
high confidence
Declared
Declared plugin/integration surface detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
high confidence
Match
Published package metadata matches the tracked repo
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
  • MCP signal live
  • External deps live
  • Tool / plugin surface live
  • Package provenance drift live

Maintain Streamdeck MCP?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores Streamdeck MCP from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Reputation Timeline

Signal history
Rank 12Listed 1HVTrust 1Grade 1Scorecard 1
2026-09-03
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 10 spots (#191 → #201)
2026-08-31
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 27 spots (#156 → #183)
2026-08-29
Scorecard Added
OSSF Scorecard: 4.7/10
2026-08-29
Grade Changed
Trust grade C → B
2026-08-29
Rank Moved
Rank rose 183 spots (#345 → #162)
2026-08-29
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 9.9pts (61.5 → 71.4)
2026-08-27
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 10 spots (#330 → #340)
2026-08-26
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 24 spots (#306 → #330)
2026-08-24
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 15 spots (#287 → #302)
2026-08-22
Rank Moved
Rank rose 13 spots (#305 → #292)
2026-08-19
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 16 spots (#286 → #302)
2026-08-18
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 12 spots (#274 → #286)
2026-08-13
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 14 spots (#255 → #269)
2026-08-12
Rank Moved
Rank rose 20 spots (#275 → #255)
2026-08-10
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 18 spots (#255 → #273)
2026-08-08
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #253

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers
HVTrust 71.0 Grade B
Markdown:
[![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/streamdeck-mcp.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/streamdeck-mcp)
HTML:
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/streamdeck-mcp"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/streamdeck-mcp.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in MCP Servers

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · PyPI / pypistats (downloads, provenance) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON