updated 2026-08-04 02:01 UTC

GPTSwarm

metauto-ai/GPTSwarm

🐝 The First Self-Improving agents with RL / Prompting Optimization

Multi-Agent Systems Python Grade D Listed MIT
14.0/100
Rank #463 of 468
Compare GPTSwarm

How does it stack up against its Multi-Agent Systems neighbours?

Pick any agent to compare →

Thin or incomplete trust evidence. Review carefully before production use.

Open compare tool Suggest correction
Listing state
Listed
Evidence coverage
Grade D · 1/5 signals
Last push
2026-02-05 · 180d ago
Recent change
New

Is GPTSwarm safe? GPTSwarm scores 14.0/100 (Grade D), ranked #463 of 468 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage D (1 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; no OSSF Scorecard result yet; 87% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-02-05. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

Ranked neighbours in Multi-Agent Systems

#24 MiroFlow — 20.7 (D) → #25 swarmclaw — 18.2 (D) → #26 MassGen — 17.6 (D) → #28 KaibanJS — 13.1 (D) →

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It
Add or improve OSSF Scorecard coverage so safety checks are easier to verify.
Recent Changes
2026-08-03
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #463
Maintainer Checklist
Add Scorecard coverage Expose the repository to OpenSSF Scorecard checks so supply-chain posture is easier to verify.
Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.
Refresh maintenance signals The repo was last pushed 180 days ago. Fresh activity helps separate stable projects from stale ones.
Compare with another agent Get email alerts for GPTSwarm View Multi-Agent Systems Report missing data
27.6
Activity sub-score · out of 100
#27
In Multi-Agent Systems

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade D reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage D is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (1 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Signals refreshed 2026-08-04 02:01 UTC · Repo last pushed 180 days ago

Rank Trend

2026-08-03 2026-08-04

Activity & Reach

Stars
1.0k
Forks
104
Last Push
2026-02-05
180 days ago
Commits (4 wk)
0
Downloads (7d)
—
HN mentions (30d)
—
Open Issues
0
Rank Change
=
was #463

Analysis

HVTrust Dimensions vs Multi-Agent Systems

14.0 / 100 · 50.0% confidence

GPTSwarm Multi-Agent Systems average (28 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits
4.4 / 25
2.7 below avg 7.1
Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance
10.8 / 18
0.5 below avg 11.3
Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard
8.5 / 17
3.0 below avg 11.5
Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity
0 / 20
12.7 below avg 12.7
AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads
7.2 / 20
3.3 below avg 10.5

Activity Inputs

27.6 / 100
StarsRepository reach
18.1 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
0.0 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
0.0 / 25
CommunityFork signal
9.4 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance
None
No package attestations found
OSSF Scorecard
—
Not available
Signed Commits
87%
of last 100 commits verified

Is GPTSwarm safe?

Public trust evidence for GPTSwarm is thin: several supply-chain signals are missing or weak. This does not mean the project is unsafe — it means an outside observer cannot easily verify the usual integrity checks. Treat with extra scrutiny.
Does GPTSwarm publish package provenance?
No published build provenance is currently detected for GPTSwarm. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.
Does GPTSwarm have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
No OpenSSF Scorecard data is currently published for GPTSwarm. Maintainers can enable the Scorecard GitHub Action to get a public score; without it, automated supply-chain hygiene is harder for outsiders to verify.
Is GPTSwarm actively maintained?
Slowing down. Last push was 180 days ago — keep an eye on whether activity resumes.
What license does GPTSwarm use?
GPTSwarm ships under MIT. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are GPTSwarm's commits signed?
87% of the last 100 commits to GPTSwarm are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface
Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support
None detected
No MCP server signal detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
External Service Dependencies
high confidence
2 detected
Public provider/service dependencies detected.
Credential signal: API keys or service config markers documented.
Tool / Plugin Surface
None detected
No clear plugin system or broad tool surface detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
N/A
No package source configured
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
  • MCP signal live
  • External deps live
  • Tool / plugin surface live
  • Package provenance drift live

Maintain GPTSwarm?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores GPTSwarm from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Submit a correction → Add the trust badge

Reputation Timeline

Signal history
Listed 1
2026-08-03
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #463
GitHub →

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers
HVTrust 14.0 Grade D
Markdown:
[![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/gptswarm.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/gptswarm)
HTML:
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/gptswarm"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/gptswarm.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in Multi-Agent Systems

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license)
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.2 · Raw JSON