Google ADK (Python)

An open-source, code-first Python toolkit for building, evaluating, and deploying sophisticated AI agents with flexibili

Agent Frameworks Python Grade B Listed Apache-2.0
68.7/100
Rank #146 of 1204
Compare Google ADK (Python)

How does it stack up against its Agent Frameworks neighbours?

Pick any agent to compare →

Promising trust profile, but some evidence still deserves review.

Open compare tool Suggest correction
Listing state
Listed
Evidence coverage
Grade B · 3/5 signals
Last push
2026-08-09 · 0d ago
Recent change
Rank +2

Is Google ADK (Python) safe? Google ADK (Python) scores 68.7/100 (Grade B), ranked #146 of 1204 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage B (3 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 6.4/10; recent commits are unsigned; last pushed 2026-08-09. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

Ranked neighbours in Agent Frameworks

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It
Publish package provenance or release attestations for stronger supply-chain evidence.
Recent Changes
2026-08-08
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 14 spots (#131 → #145)
2026-08-07
Tool Surface Changed
Detected tool/plugin surface changed: extension-based → declared
2026-08-07
Provider Added
Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: Multi-provider (LiteLLM)
Maintainer Checklist
Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 6.4/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.
Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.
Increase signed commits Raise the share of verified-signed commits to make maintainer identity and release history easier to trust.
92.6
Activity sub-score · out of 100
#25

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade B reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage B is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (3 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Signals refreshed 2026-08-09 19:31 UTC · Repo last pushed today

Activity & Reach

Stars
21.1k
Forks
3.8k
Last Push
2026-08-09
today
Commits (4 wk)
384
Downloads (7d)
3,574,900
pypi
HN mentions (30d)
Open Issues
299
Rank Change
▼1
was #145

Analysis

HVTrust Dimensions vs Agent Frameworks

68.7 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

Google ADK (Python) Agent Frameworks average (117 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits
8.0 / 25
in line with avg 8.2
Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance
10.8 / 18
0.8 below avg 11.6
Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard
13.9 / 17
2.3 above avg 11.6
Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity
20.0 / 20
5.7 above avg 14.3
AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads
19.1 / 20
7.7 above avg 11.4

Activity Inputs

92.6 / 100
StarsRepository reach
25.9 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
25.0 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
25 / 25
CommunityFork signal
16.7 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance
None
No package attestations found
OSSF Scorecard
6.4 / 10
OpenSSF Scorecard · scanned Aug 9, 2026
Signed Commits
0%
of last 100 commits verified
Binary-Artifacts 10
Branch-Protection 4
CI-Tests -1
CII-Best-Practices 0
Code-Review 10
Contributors 10
Dangerous-Workflow 10
Dependency-Update-Tool 10
Fuzzing 0
License 10
Maintained 10
Packaging -1
Pinned-Dependencies 3
SAST 0
Security-Policy 10
Signed-Releases -1
Token-Permissions 0
Vulnerabilities 4

Is Google ADK (Python) safe?

Google ADK (Python) has a mixed signal profile. Some trust indicators are present, others are missing. Whether it is safe for your use case depends on which gaps matter to you — review the breakdown below before adopting in production.
Does Google ADK (Python) publish package provenance?
No published build provenance is currently detected for Google ADK (Python). This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.
Does Google ADK (Python) have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
Google ADK (Python) has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 6.4/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.
Is Google ADK (Python) actively maintained?
Actively maintained. The repository was pushed to within the last 1 day(s).
What license does Google ADK (Python) use?
Google ADK (Python) ships under Apache-2.0. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are Google ADK (Python)'s commits signed?
0% of the last 100 commits to Google ADK (Python) are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface
Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support
medium confidence
Declared
MCP support appears present, but direct server implementation is less certain.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
External Service Dependencies
high confidence
6 detected
Public provider/service dependencies detected.
Credential signal: No explicit API-key/config marker detected.
Tool / Plugin Surface
high confidence
Declared
Declared plugin/integration surface detected.
  • browser
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
low confidence
Unknown
Package source metadata is missing or inconclusive
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
  • MCP signal live
  • External deps live
  • Tool / plugin surface live
  • Package provenance drift live
How this surface has changed

Detected changes to Google ADK (Python)'s runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.

2026-08-07
Tool Surface Changed
Detected tool/plugin surface changed: extension-based → declared
2026-08-07
Provider Added
Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: Multi-provider (LiteLLM)
2026-06-16
Provider Added
Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: E2B
2026-06-15
Provider Removed
Runtime surface shrank — no longer detected: E2B
2026-06-13
Provider Added
Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: E2B
2026-06-11
Provider Removed
Runtime surface shrank — no longer detected: E2B
2026-06-10
Provider Added
Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: E2B
2026-06-05
Tool Surface Changed
Detected tool/plugin surface changed: none → extension-based
2026-06-05
Provider Added
Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependencies: Anthropic, Browserbase, Google Gemini, OpenAI
2026-06-05
Mcp Status Changed
Detected MCP server support changed: none → declared

Maintain Google ADK (Python)?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores Google ADK (Python) from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Reputation Timeline

Signal history
Surface 5Rank 4HVTrust 2Surface 2Surface 2Listed 1Grade 1Scorecard 1Score 1MCP 1
2026-08-08
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 14 spots (#131 → #145)
2026-08-07
Tool Surface Changed
Detected tool/plugin surface changed: extension-based → declared
2026-08-07
Provider Added
Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: Multi-provider (LiteLLM)
2026-07-17
Rank Moved
Rank rose 13 spots (#125 → #112)
2026-07-13
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 14 spots (#102 → #116)
2026-06-16
Provider Added
Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: E2B
2026-06-15
Provider Removed
Runtime surface shrank — no longer detected: E2B
2026-06-13
Provider Added
Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: E2B
2026-06-11
Provider Removed
Runtime surface shrank — no longer detected: E2B
2026-06-10
Provider Added
Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: E2B
2026-06-05
Tool Surface Changed
Detected tool/plugin surface changed: none → extension-based
2026-06-05
Provider Added
Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependencies: Anthropic, Browserbase, Google Gemini, OpenAI
2026-06-05
Mcp Status Changed
Detected MCP server support changed: none → declared
2026-05-29
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 10.0pts (54.6 → 64.6)
2026-05-28
Activity Score Changed
Activity score up 25pts (67 → 92)
2026-05-27
Scorecard Added
OSSF Scorecard: 5.1/10
2026-05-27
Grade Changed
Trust grade D → C
2026-05-27
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 14.3pts (44.2 → 58.5)
2026-05-25
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 26 spots (#31 → #57)
2026-05-24
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #31

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers
HVTrust 68.7 Grade B
Markdown:
[![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/google-adk-python.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/google-adk-python)
HTML:
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/google-adk-python"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/google-adk-python.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in Agent Frameworks

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · PyPI / pypistats (downloads, provenance) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.2 · Raw JSON