Google ADK (Python)

An open-source, code-first Python toolkit for building, evaluating, and deploying sophisticated AI agents with flexibili

Agent Frameworks Python Grade B Listed Apache-2.0
Compare → Suggest correction
Listing state
Listed
HVTrust
67.5/100 · Grade B
Evidence coverage
Grade B · 3/5 signals
Last push
2026-07-11 · 0d ago
Recent change
No recent signal change

Is Google ADK (Python) safe? Google ADK (Python) scores 67.5/100 (Grade B), ranked #103 of 328 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage B (3 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 6.0/10; recent commits are unsigned; last pushed 2026-07-11. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

Quick Trust Read

Verdict
Promising trust profile, but some evidence still deserves review.
67.5/100 · Grade B
Strongest Signal
Maintenance
20.0/20
Weakest Signal
Safety / Integrity
7.5/25
What Would Improve It
Publish package provenance or release attestations for stronger supply-chain evidence.
Recent Changes
2026-06-16
Provider Added
Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: E2B
2026-06-15
Provider Removed
Runtime surface shrank — no longer detected: E2B
2026-06-13
Provider Added
Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: E2B
Maintainer Checklist
Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 6.0/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.
Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.
Increase signed commits Raise the share of verified-signed commits to make maintainer identity and release history easier to trust.
92.5
Activity Score · out of 100
67.5
HVTrust Score · out of 100
#103
Global Rank · of 328
#24

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade B reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage B is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (3 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Signals refreshed 2026-07-11 06:04 UTC · Repo last pushed today

Rank Trend

2026-07-05 2026-07-11

Activity & Reach

Stars
20.6k
Forks
3.7k
Last Push
2026-07-11
today
Commits (4 wk)
429
Downloads (7d)
3,574,900
pypi
HN mentions (30d)
Open Issues
404
Rank Change
▼1
was #102

Analysis

HVTrust Dimensions

67.5 / 100 · 100.0% confidence
Safety / IntegrityOSSF, provenance, signatures
7.5 / 25
Identity / ProvenanceListing and build link
10.8 / 18
TransparencyLicense and public checks
13.6 / 17
MaintenanceFreshness and commits
20.0 / 20
AdoptionStars and downloads
19.1 / 20

Activity Inputs

92.5 / 100
StarsRepository reach
25.9 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
25.0 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
25 / 25
CommunityFork signal
16.6 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance
None
No package attestations found
OSSF Scorecard
6.0 / 10
OpenSSF Scorecard · scanned Jul 11, 2026
Signed Commits
0%
of last 100 commits verified
Binary-Artifacts 10
Branch-Protection 2
CI-Tests -1
CII-Best-Practices 0
Code-Review 10
Contributors 10
Dangerous-Workflow 10
Dependency-Update-Tool 10
Fuzzing 0
License 10
Maintained 10
Packaging -1
Pinned-Dependencies 0
SAST 0
Security-Policy 10
Signed-Releases -1
Token-Permissions 0
Vulnerabilities 3

Is Google ADK (Python) safe?

Google ADK (Python) has a mixed signal profile. Some trust indicators are present, others are missing. Whether it is safe for your use case depends on which gaps matter to you — review the breakdown below before adopting in production.
Does Google ADK (Python) publish package provenance?
No published build provenance is currently detected for Google ADK (Python). This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.
Does Google ADK (Python) have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
Google ADK (Python) has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 6.0/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.
Is Google ADK (Python) actively maintained?
Actively maintained. The repository was pushed to within the last 1 day(s).
What license does Google ADK (Python) use?
Google ADK (Python) ships under Apache-2.0. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are Google ADK (Python)'s commits signed?
0% of the last 100 commits to Google ADK (Python) are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

Ranked neighbours in Agent Frameworks

AI agent surface

Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support
medium confidence
Declared
MCP support appears present, but direct server implementation is less certain.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
External Service Dependencies
high confidence
5 detected
Public provider/service dependencies detected.
Credential signal: No explicit API-key/config marker detected.
Tool / Plugin Surface
high confidence
Extensions
Extension based plugin/integration surface detected.
  • browser
  • code
  • shell
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
low confidence
Unknown
Package source metadata is missing or inconclusive
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
  • MCP signal live
  • External deps live
  • Tool / plugin surface live
  • Package provenance drift live
How this surface has changed

Detected changes to Google ADK (Python)'s runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.

2026-06-16
Provider Added
Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: E2B
2026-06-15
Provider Removed
Runtime surface shrank — no longer detected: E2B
2026-06-13
Provider Added
Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: E2B
2026-06-11
Provider Removed
Runtime surface shrank — no longer detected: E2B
2026-06-10
Provider Added
Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: E2B
2026-06-05
Tool Surface Changed
Detected tool/plugin surface changed: none → extension-based
2026-06-05
Provider Added
Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependencies: Anthropic, Browserbase, Google Gemini, OpenAI
2026-06-05
Mcp Status Changed
Detected MCP server support changed: none → declared

Maintain Google ADK (Python)?

HVTrust scores Google ADK (Python) from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Reputation Timeline

Surface 4HVTrust 2Surface 2Listed 1Rank 1Grade 1Scorecard 1Score 1MCP 1Surface 1
2026-06-16
Provider Added
Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: E2B
2026-06-15
Provider Removed
Runtime surface shrank — no longer detected: E2B
2026-06-13
Provider Added
Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: E2B
2026-06-11
Provider Removed
Runtime surface shrank — no longer detected: E2B
2026-06-10
Provider Added
Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: E2B
2026-06-05
Tool Surface Changed
Detected tool/plugin surface changed: none → extension-based
2026-06-05
Provider Added
Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependencies: Anthropic, Browserbase, Google Gemini, OpenAI
2026-06-05
Mcp Status Changed
Detected MCP server support changed: none → declared
2026-05-29
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 10.0pts (54.6 → 64.6)
2026-05-28
Activity Score Changed
Activity score up 25pts (67 → 92)
2026-05-27
Scorecard Added
OSSF Scorecard: 5.1/10
2026-05-27
Grade Changed
Trust grade D → C
2026-05-27
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 14.3pts (44.2 → 58.5)
2026-05-25
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 26 spots (#31 → #57)
2026-05-24
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #31

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

HVTrust 67.5 Grade B
Markdown:
[![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/google-adk-python.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/google-adk-python)
HTML:
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/google-adk-python"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/google-adk-python.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in Agent Frameworks

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · PyPI / pypistats (downloads, provenance) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.2 · Raw JSON