Gnosis MCP
Zero-config MCP server for searchable documentation (SQLite default, PostgreSQL optional)
Is Gnosis MCP safe? Promising trust profile, but some evidence still deserves review.
Compare Gnosis MCP
How does it stack up against its MCP Servers neighbours?
Pick any agent to compare →In detail: Gnosis MCP scores 71.4/100 (Grade B), ranked #306 of 1325 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage B (3 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: its packages ship with cryptographic provenance; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 3.9/10; 5% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-09-25. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →
How Gnosis MCP compares in MCP Servers
- #180 Taskade MCP 71.5 +0.1
- #181 Apple Mail MCP 71.5 +0.1
- #182 Gnosis MCP 71.4 this agent
- #183 Fred MCP Server 71.3 −0.1
- #184 FHIR MCP Server 71.3 −0.1
Bars show each HVTrust score; the tick marks Gnosis MCP’s 71.4.
Where the 71.4 comes from
HVTrust dimensions vs the MCP Servers average
71.4 / 100 · 100.0% confidenceGnosis MCP MCP Servers average (775 agents)
Quick Trust Read
How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade B reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage B is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (3 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →
Rank Trend
Activity & Reach
Analysis
Activity Inputs
59.2 / 100Supply Chain Trust
Common questions about Gnosis MCP
Does Gnosis MCP publish package provenance?
Does Gnosis MCP have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
Is Gnosis MCP actively maintained?
What license does Gnosis MCP use?
Are Gnosis MCP's commits signed?
Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.
AI agent surface
MCP, providers, tool surface
These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →
- MCP signal live
- External deps live
- Tool / plugin surface live
- Package provenance drift live
Detected changes to Gnosis MCP's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.
Maintain Gnosis MCP?
For maintainers
HVTrust scores Gnosis MCP from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.
Reputation Timeline
Signal history
Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →
For maintainers
[](https://hvtracker.net/agents/gnosis-mcp)
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/gnosis-mcp"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/gnosis-mcp.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>
Other agents in MCP Servers
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · PyPI / pypistats (downloads, provenance) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON