Clarifyprompt MCP

MCP Servers TypeScript Grade D Listed Apache-2.0
49.3/100
Rank #781 of 1320
Compare Clarifyprompt MCP

Thin or incomplete trust evidence. Review carefully before production use.

Open compare tool Suggest correction
Listing state
Listed
Evidence coverage
Grade B · 3/5 signals
Last push
2026-07-14 · 52d ago
Recent change
Rank +9

Is Clarifyprompt MCP safe? Clarifyprompt MCP scores 49.3/100 (Grade D), ranked #781 of 1320 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage B (3 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 5.2/10; recent commits are unsigned; last pushed 2026-07-14. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

Ranked neighbours in MCP Servers

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It
Publish package provenance or release attestations for stronger supply-chain evidence.
Recent Changes
2026-09-04
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 16 spots (#765 → #781)
2026-09-03
Rank Moved
Rank rose 360 spots (#1125 → #765)
2026-09-03
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 16.7pts (32.7 → 49.4)
Maintainer Checklist
Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 5.2/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.
Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.
Increase signed commits Raise the share of verified-signed commits to make maintainer identity and release history easier to trust.
Refresh maintenance signals The repo was last pushed 52 days ago. Fresh activity helps separate stable projects from stale ones.
26.8
Activity sub-score · out of 100
#412

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade D reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage B is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (3 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Signals refreshed 2026-09-04 13:33 UTC · Repo last pushed 52 days ago

Rank Trend

2026-08-11 2026-09-04

Activity & Reach

Stars
12
Forks
2
Last Push
2026-07-14
52 days ago
Commits (4 wk)
0
Downloads (7d)
160
npm
HN mentions (30d)
Open Issues
0
Rank Change
▼16
was #765

Analysis

HVTrust Dimensions vs MCP Servers

49.3 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

Clarifyprompt MCP MCP Servers average (778 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits
6.5 / 25
3.0 below avg 9.5
Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance
10.8 / 18
2.6 below avg 13.4
Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard
12.9 / 17
1.1 above avg 11.8
Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity
8.5 / 20
3.7 below avg 12.2
AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads
5.6 / 20
0.6 below avg 6.2

Activity Inputs

26.8 / 100
StarsRepository reach
6.7 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
17.8 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
0.0 / 25
CommunityFork signal
2.2 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance
None
No package attestations found
OSSF Scorecard
5.2 / 10
OpenSSF Scorecard · scanned Aug 29, 2026
Signed Commits
0%
of last 100 commits verified
Binary-Artifacts 10
Branch-Protection 0
CI-Tests -1
CII-Best-Practices 0
Code-Review 0
Contributors 6
Dangerous-Workflow 10
Dependency-Update-Tool 0
Fuzzing 0
License 10
Maintained 10
Packaging 10
Pinned-Dependencies 6
SAST 0
Security-Policy 10
Signed-Releases -1
Token-Permissions 10
Vulnerabilities 0

Is Clarifyprompt MCP safe?

Public trust evidence for Clarifyprompt MCP is thin: several supply-chain signals are missing or weak. This does not mean the project is unsafe — it means an outside observer cannot easily verify the usual integrity checks. Treat with extra scrutiny.
Does Clarifyprompt MCP publish package provenance?
No published build provenance is currently detected for Clarifyprompt MCP. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.
Does Clarifyprompt MCP have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
Clarifyprompt MCP has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 5.2/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.
Is Clarifyprompt MCP actively maintained?
Slowing down. Last push was 52 days ago — keep an eye on whether activity resumes.
What license does Clarifyprompt MCP use?
Clarifyprompt MCP ships under Apache-2.0. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are Clarifyprompt MCP's commits signed?
0% of the last 100 commits to Clarifyprompt MCP are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface
Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support
high confidence
Implemented
Clarifyprompt MCP appears to expose MCP server capabilities.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
External Service Dependencies
high confidence
1 detected
Public provider/service dependencies detected.
Credential signal: API keys or service config markers documented.
Tool / Plugin Surface
None detected
No clear plugin system or broad tool surface detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
high confidence
Match
Published package metadata matches the tracked repo
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
  • MCP signal live
  • External deps live
  • Tool / plugin surface live
  • Package provenance drift live

Maintain Clarifyprompt MCP?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores Clarifyprompt MCP from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Reputation Timeline

Signal history
Rank 11HVTrust 2Listed 1Score 1Scorecard 1
2026-09-04
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 16 spots (#765 → #781)
2026-09-03
Rank Moved
Rank rose 360 spots (#1125 → #765)
2026-09-03
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 16.7pts (32.7 → 49.4)
2026-09-02
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 39 spots (#1086 → #1125)
2026-09-01
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 43 spots (#1043 → #1086)
2026-08-31
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 33 spots (#1010 → #1043)
2026-08-30
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 51 spots (#959 → #1010)
2026-08-29
Scorecard Added
OSSF Scorecard: 5.2/10
2026-08-29
Rank Moved
Rank rose 291 spots (#1250 → #959)
2026-08-29
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 15.5pts (17.4 → 32.9)
2026-08-26
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 35 spots (#1197 → #1232)
2026-08-16
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 25 spots (#1170 → #1195)
2026-08-13
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 33 spots (#1134 → #1167)
2026-08-13
Activity Score Changed
Activity score down 6pts (36 → 30)
2026-08-10
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 66 spots (#1068 → #1134)
2026-08-08
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #1065

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers
HVTrust 49.3 Grade D
Markdown:
[![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/clarifyprompt-mcp.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/clarifyprompt-mcp)
HTML:
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/clarifyprompt-mcp"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/clarifyprompt-mcp.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in MCP Servers

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · npm Registry (downloads, provenance) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON