Is Glade MCP safe to use?

Glade MCP has an HVTrust score of 63.9/100 (Grade C), ranked #512 of 1325 tracked AI agent projects. This score reflects verifiable supply-chain integrity, transparency, maintenance, and adoption signals.

What is the trust score for Glade MCP?

Glade MCP scores 63.9/100 on HVTracker's evidence-weighted HVTrust scale. It has 224 GitHub stars and is categorized under MCP Servers.

Glade MCP

Glade-tool/glade-mcp

Connect any MCP-compatible AI client (Claude Code, Cursor, Windsurf) to Unity or Godot. 275+ granular tools, an editor aware system prompt, game design document project context, script semantic search, and skill calibration.

MCP Servers C# Listed MIT

Is Glade MCP safe? Promising trust profile, but some evidence still deserves review.

OSSF Scorecard 3.2 / 10

Provenance Attested

Signed commits 4%

Last push 24d ago

Compare Glade MCP

How does it stack up against its MCP Servers neighbours?

Pick any agent to compare →

Suggest a correction

In detail: Glade MCP scores 63.9/100 (Grade C), ranked #512 of 1325 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage B (3 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: its packages ship with cryptographic provenance; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 3.2/10; 4% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-09-02. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

How Glade MCP compares in MCP Servers

Bars show each HVTrust score; the tick marks Glade MCP’s 63.9.

Where the 63.9 comes from

HVTrust dimensions vs the MCP Servers average

63.9 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

Glade MCP MCP Servers average (775 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits

11.7 / 25

1.4 above avg 10.3

Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance

18.0 / 18

4.6 above avg 13.4

Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard

11.2 / 17

1.0 below avg 12.2

Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity

13.8 / 20

1.7 above avg 12.1

AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads

8.2 / 20

1.0 above avg 7.2

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It

Increase the share of verified signed commits for clearer maintainer identity.

Recent Changes

2026-09-24

Rank Moved

Rank rose 10 spots (#514 → #504)

2026-09-23

Provider Added

Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: OpenAI

2026-09-23

Mcp Status Changed

Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented

Maintainer Checklist

Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 3.2/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.

Increase signed commits Raise the share of verified-signed commits to make maintainer identity and release history easier to trust.

Compare with another agent Get email alerts for Glade MCP View MCP Servers Report missing data

53.0

Activity sub-score · out of 100

#296

In MCP Servers

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade C reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage B is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (3 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Rank Trend

2026-08-11 2026-09-26

Activity & Reach

Stars

224

Forks

Last Push

2026-09-02

24 days ago

Commits (4 wk)

Downloads (7d)

pypi

HN mentions (30d)

—

Open Issues

Rank Change

was #512

Analysis

Activity Inputs

53.0 / 100

StarsRepository reach

14.1 / 30

FreshnessLast push recency

21.7 / 25

ActivityRecent commits

10.5 / 25

CommunityFork signal

6.6 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance

Verified

pypi attestation

OSSF Scorecard

3.2 / 10

OpenSSF Scorecard · scanned Sep 26, 2026

Signed Commits

of last 100 commits verified

Binary-Artifacts 10

Branch-Protection 0

CI-Tests 0

CII-Best-Practices 0

Code-Review 0

Contributors 6

Dangerous-Workflow 10

Dependency-Update-Tool 0

Fuzzing 0

License 10

Maintained 10

Packaging 10

Pinned-Dependencies 0

SAST 0

Security-Policy 0

Signed-Releases 0

Token-Permissions 0

Vulnerabilities 0

Common questions about Glade MCP

Glade MCP has a mixed signal profile. Some trust indicators are present, others are missing. Whether it is safe for your use case depends on which gaps matter to you — review the breakdown below before adopting in production.

Does Glade MCP publish package provenance?

Yes. Glade MCP's package releases carry build provenance attestations, which cryptographically link the published package back to its source repository and CI workflow.

Does Glade MCP have an OpenSSF Scorecard?

Glade MCP has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 3.2/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.

Is Glade MCP actively maintained?

Maintained. Last push was 24 days ago.

What license does Glade MCP use?

Glade MCP ships under MIT. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.

Are Glade MCP's commits signed?

4% of the last 100 commits to Glade MCP are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface

Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support

high confidence

Implemented

Glade MCP appears to expose MCP server capabilities.

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

External Service Dependencies

high confidence

1 detected

Public provider/service dependencies detected.

OpenAI

Credential signal: API keys or service config markers documented.

Tool / Plugin Surface

None detected

No clear plugin system or broad tool surface detected.

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

Package Provenance Drift

low confidence

Unknown

Package source metadata is missing or inconclusive

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

MCP signal live
External deps live
Tool / plugin surface live
Package provenance drift live

How this surface has changed

Detected changes to Glade MCP's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.

2026-09-23

Provider Added

Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: OpenAI

2026-09-23

Mcp Status Changed

Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented

2026-09-23

Provenance Added

Package provenance attestation detected

Maintain Glade MCP?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores Glade MCP from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Submit a correction → Add the trust badge

Reputation Timeline

Signal history

2026-09-24

Rank Moved

Rank rose 10 spots (#514 → #504)

2026-09-23

Provider Added

Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: OpenAI

2026-09-23

Mcp Status Changed

Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented

2026-09-23

Provenance Added

Package provenance attestation detected

2026-09-23

Grade Changed

Trust grade D → C

2026-09-23

Rank Moved

Rank rose 499 spots (#1013 → #514)

2026-09-23

HVTrust Changed

HVTrust up 39.1pts (24.7 → 63.8)

2026-09-22

Newly Listed

First tracked at rank #1013

2026-09-21

Removed From Active Tracking

Removed from active tracking

2026-09-12

Grade Changed

Trust grade B → C

2026-09-11

Grade Changed

Trust grade C → B

2026-09-11

Rank Moved

Rank rose 29 spots (#484 → #455)

2026-09-09

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 10 spots (#478 → #488)

2026-09-08

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 12 spots (#466 → #478)

2026-09-07

Grade Changed

Trust grade B → C

2026-09-07

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 90 spots (#376 → #466)

2026-09-06

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 13 spots (#363 → #376)

2026-09-05

Grade Changed

Trust grade D → B

2026-09-05

Rank Moved

Rank rose 629 spots (#992 → #363)

2026-09-05

HVTrust Changed

HVTrust up 23.4pts (42.8 → 66.2)

2026-09-04

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 26 spots (#966 → #992)

2026-09-03

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 66 spots (#900 → #966)

2026-09-02

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 44 spots (#856 → #900)

2026-09-01

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 33 spots (#823 → #856)

2026-08-31

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 34 spots (#789 → #823)

2026-08-30

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 32 spots (#757 → #789)

2026-08-29

Scorecard Added

OSSF Scorecard: 3.3/10

2026-08-29

Rank Moved

Rank rose 63 spots (#820 → #757)

2026-08-29

HVTrust Changed

HVTrust up 5.5pts (37.8 → 43.3)

2026-08-28

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 25 spots (#795 → #820)

2026-08-27

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 22 spots (#773 → #795)

2026-08-26

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 101 spots (#672 → #773)

2026-08-16

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 13 spots (#642 → #655)

2026-08-10

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 26 spots (#605 → #631)

2026-08-08

Newly Listed

First tracked at rank #605

GitHub → PyPI: gladekit-mcp

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers

Markdown:
            [![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/glade-mcp.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/glade-mcp)
            
HTML:
            <a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/glade-mcp"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/glade-mcp.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in MCP Servers

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · PyPI / pypistats (downloads, provenance) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON