Eigent
Eigent: The Open Source Cowork Desktop - Local and Free Alternative to Claude Cowork and Codex
Is Eigent safe? Promising trust profile, but some evidence still deserves review.
Compare Eigent
How does it stack up against its UI & App Builders neighbours?
Pick any agent to compare →In detail: Eigent scores 62.2/100 (Grade C), ranked #566 of 1325 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage C (2 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 5.8/10; 60% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-09-26. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →
How Eigent compares in UI & App Builders
- #9 Dyad 62.8 +0.6
- #10 ToolJet 62.7 +0.5
- #11 Eigent 62.2 this agent
- #12 Yao 55.9 −6.3
- #13 vibesdk 53.3 −8.9
Bars show each HVTrust score; the tick marks Eigent’s 62.2.
Where the 62.2 comes from
HVTrust dimensions vs the UI & App Builders average
62.2 / 100 · 100.0% confidenceEigent UI & App Builders average (17 agents)
Quick Trust Read
How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade C reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage C is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (2 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →
Rank Trend
Activity & Reach
Analysis
Activity Inputs
89.8 / 100Supply Chain Trust
Common questions about Eigent
Does Eigent publish package provenance?
Does Eigent have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
Is Eigent actively maintained?
What license does Eigent use?
Are Eigent's commits signed?
Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.
AI agent surface
MCP, providers, tool surface
These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →
- database
- MCP signal live
- External deps live
- Tool / plugin surface live
- Package provenance drift live
Detected changes to Eigent's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.
Maintain Eigent?
For maintainers
HVTrust scores Eigent from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.
Reputation Timeline
Signal history
Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →
For maintainers
[](https://hvtracker.net/agents/eigent)
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/eigent"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/eigent.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>
Other agents in UI & App Builders
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON