updated 2026-08-12 05:02 UTC

DataDoe MCP

Deltologic/datadoe-mcp

Hosted Amazon Seller & Vendor MCP server. Connect Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor, Codex, Gemini, GitHub Copilot to Amazon SP-AP

MCP Servers TypeScript Grade D Listed MIT
19.0/100
Rank #1115 of 1283
Compare DataDoe MCP

How does it stack up against its MCP Servers neighbours?

Pick any agent to compare →

Thin or incomplete trust evidence. Review carefully before production use.

Open compare tool Suggest correction
Listing state
Listed
Evidence coverage
Grade D · 1/5 signals
Last push
2026-07-24 · 19d ago
Recent change
Rank +1

Is DataDoe MCP safe? DataDoe MCP scores 19.0/100 (Grade D), ranked #1115 of 1283 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage D (1 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; no OSSF Scorecard result yet; recent commits are unsigned; last pushed 2026-07-24. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

Ranked neighbours in MCP Servers

#624 MCP Crypto Price — 19.1 (D) → #625 Grok MCP — 19.1 (D) → #627 Financial Modeling Prep MCP Server — 19.0 (D) → #628 Glean Remote MCP Server — 18.9 (D) →

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It
Add or improve OSSF Scorecard coverage so safety checks are easier to verify.
Recent Changes
2026-08-10
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 64 spots (#1048 → #1112)
2026-08-08
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #1049
Maintainer Checklist
Add Scorecard coverage Expose the repository to OpenSSF Scorecard checks so supply-chain posture is easier to verify.
Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.
Increase signed commits Raise the share of verified-signed commits to make maintainer identity and release history easier to trust.
Compare with another agent Get email alerts for DataDoe MCP View MCP Servers Report missing data
33.0
Activity sub-score · out of 100
#626
In MCP Servers

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade D reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage D is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (1 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Signals refreshed 2026-08-12 05:02 UTC · Repo last pushed 19 days ago

Rank Trend

2026-08-11 2026-08-12

Activity & Reach

Stars
12
Forks
0
Last Push
2026-07-24
19 days ago
Commits (4 wk)
1
Downloads (7d)
—
HN mentions (30d)
—
Open Issues
1
Rank Change
▲3
was #1118

Analysis

HVTrust Dimensions vs MCP Servers

19.0 / 100 · 50.0% confidence

DataDoe MCP MCP Servers average (761 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits
0 / 25
5.0 below avg 5.0
Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance
10.8 / 18
2.5 below avg 13.3
Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard
8.5 / 17
in line with avg 8.8
Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity
11.9 / 20
0.5 below avg 12.4
AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads
2.7 / 20
3.1 below avg 5.8

Activity Inputs

33.0 / 100
StarsRepository reach
6.7 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
22.4 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
3.8 / 25
CommunityFork signal
0.0 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance
None
No package attestations found
OSSF Scorecard
—
Not available
Signed Commits
0%
of last 100 commits verified

Is DataDoe MCP safe?

Public trust evidence for DataDoe MCP is thin: several supply-chain signals are missing or weak. This does not mean the project is unsafe — it means an outside observer cannot easily verify the usual integrity checks. Treat with extra scrutiny.
Does DataDoe MCP publish package provenance?
No published build provenance is currently detected for DataDoe MCP. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.
Does DataDoe MCP have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
No OpenSSF Scorecard data is currently published for DataDoe MCP. Maintainers can enable the Scorecard GitHub Action to get a public score; without it, automated supply-chain hygiene is harder for outsiders to verify.
Is DataDoe MCP actively maintained?
Maintained. Last push was 19 days ago.
What license does DataDoe MCP use?
DataDoe MCP ships under MIT. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are DataDoe MCP's commits signed?
0% of the last 100 commits to DataDoe MCP are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface
Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support
high confidence
Implemented
DataDoe MCP appears to expose MCP server capabilities.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
External Service Dependencies
None detected
No clear third-party provider dependency detected.
Credential signal: No explicit API-key/config marker detected.
Tool / Plugin Surface
None detected
No clear plugin system or broad tool surface detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
N/A
No package source configured
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
  • MCP signal live
  • External deps live
  • Tool / plugin surface live
  • Package provenance drift live

Maintain DataDoe MCP?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores DataDoe MCP from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Submit a correction → Add the trust badge

Reputation Timeline

Signal history
Listed 1Rank 1
2026-08-10
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 64 spots (#1048 → #1112)
2026-08-08
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #1049
GitHub →

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers
HVTrust 19.0 Grade D
Markdown:
[![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/datadoe-mcp.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/datadoe-mcp)
HTML:
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/datadoe-mcp"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/datadoe-mcp.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in MCP Servers

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license)
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON