Is MCP Eu Ai Act safe to use?

MCP Eu Ai Act has an HVTrust score of 50.1/100 (Grade C), ranked #933 of 1325 tracked AI agent projects. This score reflects verifiable supply-chain integrity, transparency, maintenance, and adoption signals.

What is the trust score for MCP Eu Ai Act?

MCP Eu Ai Act scores 50.1/100 on HVTracker's evidence-weighted HVTrust scale. It has 11 GitHub stars and is categorized under MCP Servers.

MCP Eu Ai Act

ark-forge/mcp-eu-ai-act

MCP EU AI Act Compliance Scanner - Open source tool to detect EU AI Act violations in codebases

MCP Servers Python Listed MIT

Is MCP Eu Ai Act safe? Thin or incomplete trust evidence. Review carefully before production use.

OSSF Scorecard 4.6 / 10

Provenance None

Signed commits 7%

Last push yesterday

Compare MCP Eu Ai Act

How does it stack up against its MCP Servers neighbours?

Pick any agent to compare →

Suggest a correction

In detail: MCP Eu Ai Act scores 50.1/100 (Grade C), ranked #933 of 1325 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage C (2 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 4.6/10; 7% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-09-25. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

How MCP Eu Ai Act compares in MCP Servers

Bars show each HVTrust score; the tick marks MCP Eu Ai Act’s 50.1.

Where the 50.1 comes from

HVTrust dimensions vs the MCP Servers average

50.1 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

MCP Eu Ai Act MCP Servers average (775 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits

6.1 / 25

4.2 below avg 10.3

Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance

10.8 / 18

2.6 below avg 13.4

Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard

12.4 / 17

in line with avg 12.2

Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity

17.2 / 20

5.1 above avg 12.1

AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads

2.6 / 20

4.6 below avg 7.2

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It

Publish package provenance or release attestations for stronger supply-chain evidence.

Recent Changes

2026-09-25

Grade Changed

Trust grade D → C

2026-09-25

Rank Moved

Rank rose 10 spots (#944 → #934)

2026-09-23

Mcp Status Changed

Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented

Maintainer Checklist

Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 4.6/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.

Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.

Increase signed commits Raise the share of verified-signed commits to make maintainer identity and release history easier to trust.

Compare with another agent Get email alerts for MCP Eu Ai Act View MCP Servers Report missing data

50.8

Activity sub-score · out of 100

#534

In MCP Servers

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade C reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage C is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (2 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Rank Trend

2026-08-11 2026-09-26

Activity & Reach

Stars

Forks

Last Push

2026-09-25

yesterday

Commits (4 wk)

Downloads (7d)

—

HN mentions (30d)

—

Open Issues

Rank Change

▲1

was #934

Analysis

Activity Inputs

50.8 / 100

StarsRepository reach

6.5 / 30

FreshnessLast push recency

24.9 / 25

ActivityRecent commits

16.5 / 25

CommunityFork signal

2.8 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance

None

No package attestations found

OSSF Scorecard

4.6 / 10

OpenSSF Scorecard · scanned Sep 14, 2026

Signed Commits

of last 100 commits verified

Binary-Artifacts 10

Branch-Protection 6

CI-Tests 10

CII-Best-Practices 0

Code-Review 0

Contributors 3

Dangerous-Workflow 10

Dependency-Update-Tool 0

Fuzzing 0

License 10

Maintained 10

Packaging 10

Pinned-Dependencies 0

SAST 0

Security-Policy 10

Signed-Releases -1

Token-Permissions 0

Vulnerabilities 0

Common questions about MCP Eu Ai Act

Public trust evidence for MCP Eu Ai Act is thin: several supply-chain signals are missing or weak. This does not mean the project is unsafe — it means an outside observer cannot easily verify the usual integrity checks. Treat with extra scrutiny.

Does MCP Eu Ai Act publish package provenance?

No published build provenance is currently detected for MCP Eu Ai Act. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.

Does MCP Eu Ai Act have an OpenSSF Scorecard?

MCP Eu Ai Act has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 4.6/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.

Is MCP Eu Ai Act actively maintained?

Actively maintained. The repository was pushed to within the last 1 day(s).

What license does MCP Eu Ai Act use?

MCP Eu Ai Act ships under MIT. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.

Are MCP Eu Ai Act's commits signed?

7% of the last 100 commits to MCP Eu Ai Act are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface

Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support

high confidence

Implemented

MCP Eu Ai Act appears to expose MCP server capabilities.

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

External Service Dependencies

low confidence

None detected

No clear third-party provider dependency detected.

Credential signal: API keys or service config markers documented.

Tool / Plugin Surface

None detected

No clear plugin system or broad tool surface detected.

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

Package Provenance Drift

N/A

No package source configured

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

MCP signal live
External deps live
Tool / plugin surface live
Package provenance drift live

How this surface has changed

Detected changes to MCP Eu Ai Act's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.

2026-09-23

Mcp Status Changed

Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented

2026-08-12

Tool Surface Changed

Detected tool/plugin surface changed: declared → none

Maintain MCP Eu Ai Act?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores MCP Eu Ai Act from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Submit a correction → Add the trust badge

Reputation Timeline

Signal history

2026-09-25

Grade Changed

Trust grade D → C

2026-09-25

Rank Moved

Rank rose 10 spots (#944 → #934)

2026-09-23

Mcp Status Changed

Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented

2026-09-23

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 421 spots (#524 → #945)

2026-09-23

HVTrust Changed

HVTrust up 9.9pts (39.4 → 49.3)

2026-09-22

Newly Listed

First tracked at rank #524

2026-09-21

Removed From Active Tracking

Removed from active tracking

2026-09-11

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 13 spots (#953 → #966)

2026-09-08

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 18 spots (#925 → #943)

2026-09-07

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 38 spots (#887 → #925)

2026-09-06

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 14 spots (#873 → #887)

2026-09-05

Rank Moved

Rank rose 26 spots (#899 → #873)

2026-09-04

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 31 spots (#868 → #899)

2026-09-03

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 52 spots (#816 → #868)

2026-09-02

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 46 spots (#770 → #816)

2026-09-01

Rank Moved

Rank rose 213 spots (#983 → #770)

2026-09-01

HVTrust Changed

HVTrust up 10.4pts (35.7 → 46.1)

2026-09-01

Activity Score Changed

Activity score up 26pts (22 → 47)

2026-08-31

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 34 spots (#949 → #983)

2026-08-30

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 48 spots (#901 → #949)

2026-08-29

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 47 spots (#854 → #901)

2026-08-28

Scorecard Added

OSSF Scorecard: 3.2/10

2026-08-28

Rank Moved

Rank rose 428 spots (#1282 → #854)

2026-08-28

HVTrust Changed

HVTrust up 20.7pts (15.2 → 35.9)

2026-08-26

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 18 spots (#1258 → #1276)

2026-08-16

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 27 spots (#1227 → #1254)

2026-08-12

Tool Surface Changed

Detected tool/plugin surface changed: declared → none

2026-08-12

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 14 spots (#1208 → #1222)

2026-08-10

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 76 spots (#1132 → #1208)

2026-08-08

Newly Listed

First tracked at rank #1145

GitHub →

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers

Markdown:
            [![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/mcp-eu-ai-act.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/mcp-eu-ai-act)
            
HTML:
            <a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/mcp-eu-ai-act"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/mcp-eu-ai-act.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in MCP Servers

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON