Cube Sandbox

Instant, Concurrent, Secure & Lightweight Sandbox for AI Agents.

Sandboxes & Runtimes Rust Grade D Listed NOASSERTION
Compare → Suggest correction
Listing state
Listed
HVTrust
24.9/100 · Grade D
Evidence coverage
Grade D · 1/5 signals
Last push
2026-07-14 · 1d ago
Recent change
New

Is Cube Sandbox safe? Cube Sandbox scores 24.9/100 (Grade D), ranked #387 of 417 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage D (1 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; no OSSF Scorecard result yet; 86% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-07-14. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

Quick Trust Read

Verdict
Thin or incomplete trust evidence. Review carefully before production use.
24.9/100 · Grade D
Strongest Signal
Maintenance
19.9/20
Weakest Signal
Safety / Integrity
4.3/25
What Would Improve It
Add or improve OSSF Scorecard coverage so safety checks are easier to verify.
Recent Changes
2026-07-14
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #387
Maintainer Checklist
Add Scorecard coverage Expose the repository to OpenSSF Scorecard checks so supply-chain posture is easier to verify.
Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.
87.9
Activity Score · out of 100
24.9
HVTrust Score · out of 100
#387
Global Rank · of 417
#5

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade D reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage D is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (1 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Signals refreshed 2026-07-15 01:30 UTC · Repo last pushed yesterday

Rank Trend

2026-07-14 2026-07-15

Activity & Reach

Stars
10.2k
Forks
983
Last Push
2026-07-14
yesterday
Commits (4 wk)
217
Downloads (7d)
HN mentions (30d)
Open Issues
71
Rank Change
=
was #387

Analysis

HVTrust Dimensions

24.9 / 100 · 40.0% confidence
Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits
4.3 / 25
Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance
10.8 / 18
Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard
8.5 / 17
Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity
19.9 / 20
Adoption60% stars · 40% downloads, log-scaled
9.6 / 20

Activity Inputs

87.9 / 100
StarsRepository reach
24.0 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
24.9 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
25 / 25
CommunityFork signal
13.9 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance
None
No package attestations found
OSSF Scorecard
Not available
Signed Commits
86%
of last 100 commits verified

Is Cube Sandbox safe?

Public trust evidence for Cube Sandbox is thin: several supply-chain signals are missing or weak. This does not mean the project is unsafe — it means an outside observer cannot easily verify the usual integrity checks. Treat with extra scrutiny.
Does Cube Sandbox publish package provenance?
No published build provenance is currently detected for Cube Sandbox. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.
Does Cube Sandbox have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
No OpenSSF Scorecard data is currently published for Cube Sandbox. Maintainers can enable the Scorecard GitHub Action to get a public score; without it, automated supply-chain hygiene is harder for outsiders to verify.
Is Cube Sandbox actively maintained?
Actively maintained. The repository was pushed to within the last 1 day(s).
What license does Cube Sandbox use?
Cube Sandbox ships under NOASSERTION. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are Cube Sandbox's commits signed?
86% of the last 100 commits to Cube Sandbox are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

Ranked neighbours in Sandboxes & Runtimes

AI agent surface

Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support
None detected
No MCP server signal detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
External Service Dependencies
high confidence
1 detected
Public provider/service dependencies detected.
Credential signal: No explicit API-key/config marker detected.
Tool / Plugin Surface
medium confidence
Declared
Declared plugin/integration surface detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
high confidence
Match
Published package metadata matches the tracked repo
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
  • MCP signal live
  • External deps live
  • Tool / plugin surface live
  • Package provenance drift live

Maintain Cube Sandbox?

HVTrust scores Cube Sandbox from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Reputation Timeline

Listed 1
2026-07-14
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #387

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

HVTrust 24.9 Grade D
Markdown:
[![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/cube-sandbox.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/cube-sandbox)
HTML:
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/cube-sandbox"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/cube-sandbox.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in Sandboxes & Runtimes

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · PyPI / pypistats (downloads, provenance)
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.2 · Raw JSON