BoxLite vs Cube Sandbox
BoxLite leads on trust: 85.8/100 (Grade A) against 72.5/100 (Grade B), a 13.3-point gap. BoxLite leads on supply-chain integrity and provenance.
The micro-VM for AI agents — light enough to embed on your laptop, elastic enough to power an agentic cloud.
Choose BoxLite if supply-chain integrity and provenance matter most.
- +8.1Safety / Integrity: 100% of recent commits signed, against 94%
- +7.2Identity / Provenance: package provenance attested, against none
Instant, Concurrent, Secure & Lightweight Sandbox for AI Agents.
Cube Sandbox doesn't lead on any scored dimension in this pair.
Where they differ
1 dimension identical: Maintenance 19.9 · Full evidence table
An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of BoxLite and Cube Sandbox, two Sandboxes & Runtimes projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.
Full evidence
| Signal | BoxLiteboxlite-ai/boxlite | Cube SandboxTencentCloud/CubeSandbox |
|---|---|---|
| HVTrust score | 85.8 | 72.5 |
| Evidence grade | A | B |
| Coverage grade | B | B |
| Overall rank | #87 | #307 |
| Rank in Sandboxes & Runtimes | #1 | #5 |
| GitHub stars | 2.7k | 13.1k |
| Last updated | 1d ago | 1d ago |
| Build provenance | Yes | No |
| OSSF Scorecard | 5.2 / 10 | 5.0 / 10 |
| License | Apache-2.0 | NOASSERTION |
| Downloads | 90k/wk | 3k/wk |
| Trust dimensions (points earned) | ||
| Safety / integrity / 25 | 19.0 | 10.9 |
| Identity & provenance / 18 | 18.0 | 10.8 |
| Transparency / 17 | 12.9 | 12.8 |
| Maintenance / 20 | 19.9 | 19.9 |
| Adoption / 20 | 14.8 | 14.4 |
| Runtime capability surface (full matrix) | ||
| MCP server | — | — |
| External providers | 3 — Anthropic, Postgres, Redis | — |
| Requires API keys | No | No |
| Plugin surface | plugins | plugins |
| Provenance drift | Match | Match |
How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.4 →