Cube Sandbox vs E2B
An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Cube Sandbox and E2B, two Sandboxes & Runtimes projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.
E2B leads on trust — 75.6/100 (Grade B) vs 46.2/100 (Grade D), a 29.4-point gap. Full breakdown below.
| Signal | Cube SandboxTencentCloud/CubeSandbox | E2Be2b-dev/e2b |
|---|---|---|
| HVTrust score | 46.2 | 75.6 |
| Evidence grade | D | B |
| Coverage grade | C | A |
| Overall rank | #509 | #88 |
| Rank in Sandboxes & Runtimes | #7 | #2 |
| GitHub stars | 11.1k | 13.4k |
| Last updated | 1d ago | 2d ago |
| Build provenance | No | No |
| OSSF Scorecard | 5.0 / 10 | 5.6 / 10 |
| License | NOASSERTION | Apache-2.0 |
| Downloads | — | 982k/wk |
| Trust dimensions (points earned) | ||
| Safety / integrity / 25 | 10.6 | 11.2 |
| Identity & provenance / 18 | 10.8 | 10.8 |
| Transparency / 17 | 12.8 | 13.3 |
| Maintenance / 20 | 19.9 | 19.4 |
| Adoption / 20 | 9.7 | 17.9 |
| Runtime capability surface (full matrix) | ||
| MCP server | — | Declared |
| External providers | — | 1 — E2B |
| Requires API keys | No | Yes |
| Plugin surface | plugins | — |
| Provenance drift | Match | Match |
How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →