Fence

Lightweight, container-free sandbox for running commands with network and filesystem restrictions

Sandboxes & Runtimes Go Grade C Listed Apache-2.0
58.8/100
Rank #487 of 1320
Compare Fence

Promising trust profile, but some evidence still deserves review.

Open compare tool Suggest correction
Listing state
Listed
Evidence coverage
Grade C · 2/5 signals
Last push
2026-09-01 · 3d ago
Recent change
Rank +8

Is Fence safe? Fence scores 58.8/100 (Grade C), ranked #487 of 1320 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage C (2 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 7.1/10; 79% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-09-01. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

Ranked neighbours in Sandboxes & Runtimes

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It
Publish package provenance or release attestations for stronger supply-chain evidence.
Recent Changes
2026-09-04
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 14 spots (#473 → #487)
2026-09-03
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 15 spots (#458 → #473)
2026-09-02
Tool Surface Changed
Detected tool/plugin surface changed: extension-based → none
Maintainer Checklist
Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.
61.3
Activity sub-score · out of 100
#6

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade C reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage C is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (2 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Signals refreshed 2026-09-04 23:12 UTC · Repo last pushed 3 days ago

Rank Trend

2026-08-11 2026-09-04

Activity & Reach

Stars
949
Forks
40
Last Push
2026-09-01
3 days ago
Commits (4 wk)
7?
Downloads (7d)
HN mentions (30d)
Open Issues
29
Rank Change
▼14
was #473

Analysis

HVTrust Dimensions vs Sandboxes & Runtimes

58.8 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

Fence Sandboxes & Runtimes average (10 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits
12.8 / 25
1.4 above avg 11.4
Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance
10.8 / 18
0.7 below avg 11.5
Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard
14.5 / 17
2.2 above avg 12.2
Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity
13.6 / 20
1.5 below avg 15.1
AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads
7.1 / 20
5.1 below avg 12.2

Activity Inputs

61.3 / 100
StarsRepository reach
17.9 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
24.6 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
11.3 / 25
CommunityFork signal
7.5 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance
None
No package attestations found
OSSF Scorecard
7.1 / 10
OpenSSF Scorecard · scanned Sep 4, 2026
Signed Commits
79%
of last 100 commits verified
Binary-Artifacts 10
Branch-Protection 3
CI-Tests 10
CII-Best-Practices 0
Code-Review 2
Contributors 3
Dangerous-Workflow 10
Dependency-Update-Tool 10
Fuzzing 0
License 10
Maintained 10
Packaging 10
Pinned-Dependencies 0
SAST 0
Security-Policy 10
Signed-Releases 10
Token-Permissions 10
Vulnerabilities 10

Is Fence safe?

Fence has a mixed signal profile. Some trust indicators are present, others are missing. Whether it is safe for your use case depends on which gaps matter to you — review the breakdown below before adopting in production.
Does Fence publish package provenance?
No published build provenance is currently detected for Fence. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.
Does Fence have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
Fence has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 7.1/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.
Is Fence actively maintained?
Actively maintained. The repository was pushed to within the last 3 day(s).
What license does Fence use?
Fence ships under Apache-2.0. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are Fence's commits signed?
79% of the last 100 commits to Fence are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

Compare Fence head-to-head

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface
Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support
None detected
No MCP server signal detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
External Service Dependencies
None detected
No clear third-party provider dependency detected.
Credential signal: No explicit API-key/config marker detected.
Tool / Plugin Surface
None detected
No clear plugin system or broad tool surface detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
N/A
No package source configured
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
  • MCP signal live
  • External deps live
  • Tool / plugin surface live
  • Package provenance drift live
How this surface has changed

Detected changes to Fence's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.

2026-09-02
Tool Surface Changed
Detected tool/plugin surface changed: extension-based → none
2026-09-02
Provider Removed
Runtime surface shrank — no longer detected: Redis

Maintain Fence?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores Fence from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Reputation Timeline

Signal history
Rank 14Listed 1HVTrust 1Grade 1Scorecard 1Surface 1Surface 1
2026-09-04
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 14 spots (#473 → #487)
2026-09-03
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 15 spots (#458 → #473)
2026-09-02
Tool Surface Changed
Detected tool/plugin surface changed: extension-based → none
2026-09-02
Provider Removed
Runtime surface shrank — no longer detected: Redis
2026-09-02
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 42 spots (#416 → #458)
2026-09-01
Rank Moved
Rank rose 20 spots (#436 → #416)
2026-08-31
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 49 spots (#387 → #436)
2026-08-30
Rank Moved
Rank rose 10 spots (#397 → #387)
2026-08-29
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 25 spots (#372 → #397)
2026-08-26
Scorecard Added
OSSF Scorecard: 7.1/10
2026-08-26
Grade Changed
Trust grade D → C
2026-08-26
Rank Moved
Rank rose 605 spots (#969 → #364)
2026-08-26
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 37.8pts (22.2 → 60.0)
2026-08-24
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 11 spots (#960 → #971)
2026-08-18
Rank Moved
Rank rose 12 spots (#969 → #957)
2026-08-17
Rank Moved
Rank rose 14 spots (#983 → #969)
2026-08-16
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 33 spots (#950 → #983)
2026-08-13
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 14 spots (#937 → #951)
2026-08-12
Rank Moved
Rank rose 10 spots (#947 → #937)
2026-08-10
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #939

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers
HVTrust 58.8 Grade C
Markdown:
[![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/fence.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/fence)
HTML:
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/fence"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/fence.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in Sandboxes & Runtimes

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON