How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade D reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Full methodology →
Signals refreshed2026-06-11 18:03 UTC·Repo last pushed 100 days ago
Activity & Reach
Stars
8.2k
Forks
1.1k
Last Push
2026-03-03
100 days ago
Commits (4 wk)
0
Downloads (7d)
—
HN mentions (30d)
—
Open Issues
36
Rank Change
NEW
Analysis
HVTrust Dimensions
17.8 / 100 · 50.0% confidence
Safety / IntegrityOSSF, provenance, signatures
1.5 / 25
Identity / ProvenanceListing and build link
10.8 / 18
TransparencyLicense and public checks
8.5 / 17
MaintenanceFreshness and commits
5.3 / 20
AdoptionStars and downloads
9.4 / 20
Activity Inputs
48.7 / 100
StarsRepository reach
23.5 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
11.1 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
0.0 / 25
CommunityFork signal
14.1 / 20
Supply Chain Trust
Package Provenance
None
No package attestations found
OSSF Scorecard
—
Not available
Signed Commits
30%
of last 100 commits verified
Is ClawWork safe?
Public trust evidence for ClawWork is thin: several supply-chain signals are missing or weak. This does not mean the project is unsafe — it means an outside observer cannot easily verify the usual integrity checks. Treat with extra scrutiny.
Does ClawWork publish package provenance?
No published build provenance is currently detected for ClawWork. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.
Does ClawWork have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
No OpenSSF Scorecard data is currently published for ClawWork. Maintainers can enable the Scorecard GitHub Action to get a public score; without it, automated supply-chain hygiene is harder for outsiders to verify.
Is ClawWork actively maintained?
Slowing down. Last push was 100 days ago — keep an eye on whether activity resumes.
What license does ClawWork use?
ClawWork ships under MIT. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are ClawWork's commits signed?
29% of the last 100 commits to ClawWork are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.
Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.
AI agent surface
Profile context only
HVTrust currently ranks supply-chain and project-integrity trust only. This public view shows a compact AI-agent surface snapshot from repo docs and manifests. These fields are descriptive context and do not affect the production HVTrust rank. An experimental local preview remains available in Score Lab →, and the policy boundary is tracked on the roadmap →
MCP Server Support
medium confidence
Declared
MCP support appears present, but direct server implementation is less certain.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
External Service Dependencies
high confidence
4 detected
Public provider/service dependencies detected.
E2B
Google Gemini
OpenAI
Tavily
Credential signal:
API keys or service config markers documented.
Tool / Plugin Surface
high confidence
Marketplace
Marketplace plugin/integration surface detected.
code
search
shell
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
N/A
No package source configured
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
MCP signal live
External deps live
Tool / plugin surface live
Package provenance drift live
Maintain ClawWork?
HVTrust scores ClawWork from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.
Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license)
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v3.2 · Raw JSON
