How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade D reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Full methodology →
Signals refreshed2026-06-11 18:03 UTC·Repo last pushed today
Activity & Reach
Stars
43.8k
Forks
3.9k
Last Push
2026-06-11
today
Commits (4 wk)
39
Downloads (7d)
—
HN mentions (30d)
—
Open Issues
99
Rank Change
NEW
Analysis
HVTrust Dimensions
24.4 / 100 · 50.0% confidence
Safety / IntegrityOSSF, provenance, signatures
0.0 / 25
Identity / ProvenanceListing and build link
10.8 / 18
TransparencyLicense and public checks
8.5 / 17
MaintenanceFreshness and commits
18.4 / 20
AdoptionStars and downloads
11.1 / 20
Activity Inputs
69.5 / 100
StarsRepository reach
27.8 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
25.0 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
20.0 / 25
CommunityFork signal
16.7 / 20
Supply Chain Trust
Package Provenance
None
No package attestations found
OSSF Scorecard
—
Not available
Signed Commits
—
Unable to query
Is Supervision safe?
Public trust evidence for Supervision is thin: several supply-chain signals are missing or weak. This does not mean the project is unsafe — it means an outside observer cannot easily verify the usual integrity checks. Treat with extra scrutiny.
Does Supervision publish package provenance?
No published build provenance is currently detected for Supervision. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.
Does Supervision have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
No OpenSSF Scorecard data is currently published for Supervision. Maintainers can enable the Scorecard GitHub Action to get a public score; without it, automated supply-chain hygiene is harder for outsiders to verify.
Is Supervision actively maintained?
Actively maintained. The repository was pushed to within the last 1 day(s).
What license does Supervision use?
Supervision ships under MIT. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.
HVTrust currently ranks supply-chain and project-integrity trust only. This public view shows a compact AI-agent surface snapshot from repo docs and manifests. These fields are descriptive context and do not affect the production HVTrust rank. An experimental local preview remains available in Score Lab →, and the policy boundary is tracked on the roadmap →
MCP Server Support
None detected
No MCP server signal detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
External Service Dependencies
None detected
No clear third-party provider dependency detected.
Credential signal:
No explicit API-key/config marker detected.
Tool / Plugin Surface
None detected
No clear plugin system or broad tool surface detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
N/A
No package source configured
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
MCP signal live
External deps live
Tool / plugin surface live
Package provenance drift live
Maintain Supervision?
HVTrust scores Supervision from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.
Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license)
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v3.2 · Raw JSON
