Obsidian Second Brain

Cross-CLI skill for Obsidian: turn your vault into a living AI-first second brain across Claude Code, Codex, Gemini, and

Needs review Python Grade D Listed MIT
Listing state
Listed
HVTrust
23.9/100 · Grade D
Last push
2026-06-07 · 4d ago
Recent change
New

Quick Trust Read

Verdict
Thin or incomplete trust evidence. Review carefully before production use.
23.9/100 · Grade D
Strongest Signal
Maintenance
18.4/20
Weakest Signal
Safety / Integrity
2.0/25
What Would Improve It
Add or improve OSSF Scorecard coverage so safety checks are easier to verify.
Recent Changes
2026-06-11
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #215
Maintainer Checklist
Add Scorecard coverage Expose the repository to OpenSSF Scorecard checks so supply-chain posture is easier to verify.
Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.
Increase signed commits Raise the share of verified-signed commits to make maintainer identity and release history easier to trust.
77.2
Activity Score · out of 100
23.9
HVTrust Score · out of 100
#215
Global Rank · of 223
#3

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade D reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Full methodology →

Signals refreshed 2026-06-11 18:03 UTC · Repo last pushed 4 days ago

Activity & Reach

Stars
2.4k
Forks
275
Last Push
2026-06-07
4 days ago
Commits (4 wk)
46
Downloads (7d)
HN mentions (30d)
Open Issues
2
Rank Change
NEW

Analysis

HVTrust Dimensions

23.9 / 100 · 50.0% confidence
Safety / IntegrityOSSF, provenance, signatures
2.0 / 25
Identity / ProvenanceListing and build link
10.8 / 18
TransparencyLicense and public checks
8.5 / 17
MaintenanceFreshness and commits
18.4 / 20
AdoptionStars and downloads
8.1 / 20

Activity Inputs

77.2 / 100
StarsRepository reach
20.3 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
24.4 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
20.9 / 25
CommunityFork signal
11.4 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance
None
No package attestations found
OSSF Scorecard
Not available
Signed Commits
40%
of last 100 commits verified

Is Obsidian Second Brain safe?

Public trust evidence for Obsidian Second Brain is thin: several supply-chain signals are missing or weak. This does not mean the project is unsafe — it means an outside observer cannot easily verify the usual integrity checks. Treat with extra scrutiny.
Does Obsidian Second Brain publish package provenance?
No published build provenance is currently detected for Obsidian Second Brain. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.
Does Obsidian Second Brain have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
No OpenSSF Scorecard data is currently published for Obsidian Second Brain. Maintainers can enable the Scorecard GitHub Action to get a public score; without it, automated supply-chain hygiene is harder for outsiders to verify.
Is Obsidian Second Brain actively maintained?
Actively maintained. The repository was pushed to within the last 4 day(s).
What license does Obsidian Second Brain use?
Obsidian Second Brain ships under MIT. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are Obsidian Second Brain's commits signed?
40% of the last 100 commits to Obsidian Second Brain are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

Compare Obsidian Second Brain head-to-head

AI agent surface

Profile context only

HVTrust currently ranks supply-chain and project-integrity trust only. This public view shows a compact AI-agent surface snapshot from repo docs and manifests. These fields are descriptive context and do not affect the production HVTrust rank. An experimental local preview remains available in Score Lab →, and the policy boundary is tracked on the roadmap →

MCP Server Support
None detected
No MCP server signal detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
External Service Dependencies
high confidence
3 detected
Public provider/service dependencies detected.
  • Anthropic
  • Google Gemini
  • OpenAI
Credential signal: API keys or service config markers documented.
Tool / Plugin Surface
high confidence
Declared
Declared plugin/integration surface detected.
  • code
  • search
  • shell
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
N/A
No package source configured
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
  • MCP signal live
  • External deps live
  • Tool / plugin surface live
  • Package provenance drift live

Maintain Obsidian Second Brain?

HVTrust scores Obsidian Second Brain from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Reputation Timeline

Listed 1
2026-06-11
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #215

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

HVTrust 23.9 Grade D
Markdown:
[![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/obsidian-second-brain.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/obsidian-second-brain)
HTML:
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/obsidian-second-brain"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/obsidian-second-brain.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in Needs review

Obsidian Second Brain head-to-head

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license)
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v3.2 · Raw JSON