Is Claude Video Vision safe to use?

Claude Video Vision has an HVTrust score of 46.8/100 (Grade D), ranked #274 of 351 tracked AI agent projects. This score reflects verifiable supply-chain integrity, transparency, maintenance, and adoption signals.

What is the trust score for Claude Video Vision?

Claude Video Vision scores 46.8/100 on HVTracker's evidence-weighted HVTrust scale. It has 1.3k GitHub stars and is categorized under Agent Skills.

Claude Video Vision

jordanrendric/claude-video-vision

Give Claude the ability to watch and understand videos — Claude Code plugin with frame extraction and multimodal audio analysis

Agent Skills TypeScript Listed MIT

Is Claude Video Vision safe? Thin or incomplete trust evidence. Review carefully before production use.

OSSF Scorecard 4.8 / 10

Provenance None

Signed commits 31%

Last push 50d ago

Compare Claude Video Vision

How does it stack up against its Agent Skills neighbours?

Pick any agent to compare →

Suggest a correction

In detail: Claude Video Vision scores 46.8/100 (Grade D), ranked #274 of 351 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage C (2 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 4.8/10; 31% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-08-07. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

How Claude Video Vision compares in Agent Skills

#272 Xint 47.0 +0.2
#273 Browser Act Skills 46.9 +0.1
#274 Claude Video Vision 46.8 this agent
#275 ResearcherSkill 46.8 ±0
#276 Heygen Com Skills 46.5 −0.3

Bars show each HVTrust score; the tick marks Claude Video Vision’s 46.8.

Where the 46.8 comes from

HVTrust dimensions vs the Agent Skills average

46.8 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

Claude Video Vision Agent Skills average (351 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits

7.5 / 25

0.6 below avg 8.1

Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance

10.8 / 18

0.6 below avg 11.4

Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard

12.6 / 17

in line with avg 12.2

Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity

8.7 / 20

5.5 below avg 14.2

AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads

7.5 / 20

1.5 below avg 9.0

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It

Publish package provenance or release attestations for stronger supply-chain evidence.

Recent Changes

2026-09-25

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 24 spots (#250 → #274)

2026-09-23

Tool Surface Changed

Detected tool/plugin surface changed: none → declared

2026-09-23

Provider Added

Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependencies: Anthropic, Google Gemini, OpenAI

Maintainer Checklist

Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 4.8/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.

Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.

Increase signed commits Raise the share of verified-signed commits to make maintainer identity and release history easier to trust.

Refresh maintenance signals The repo was last pushed 50 days ago. Fresh activity helps separate stable projects from stale ones.

Compare with another agent Get email alerts for Claude Video Vision View Agent Skills Report missing data

47.1

Activity sub-score · out of 100

#274

In Agent Skills

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade D reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage C is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (2 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Rank Trend

2026-08-11 2026-09-26

Activity & Reach

Stars

1.3k

Forks

156

Last Push

2026-08-07

50 days ago

Commits (4 wk)

Downloads (7d)

—

HN mentions (30d)

—

Open Issues

Rank Change

was #274

Analysis

Activity Inputs

47.1 / 100

StarsRepository reach

18.8 / 30

FreshnessLast push recency

18.1 / 25

ActivityRecent commits

0.0 / 25

CommunityFork signal

10.2 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance

None

No package attestations found

OSSF Scorecard

4.8 / 10

OpenSSF Scorecard · scanned Sep 24, 2026

Signed Commits

31%

of last 100 commits verified

Binary-Artifacts 10

Branch-Protection 3

CI-Tests 2

CII-Best-Practices 0

Code-Review 6

Contributors 3

Dangerous-Workflow 10

Dependency-Update-Tool 10

Fuzzing 0

License 10

Maintained 0

Packaging 10

Pinned-Dependencies 2

SAST 0

Security-Policy 10

Signed-Releases -1

Token-Permissions 0

Vulnerabilities 0

Common questions about Claude Video Vision

Public trust evidence for Claude Video Vision is thin: several supply-chain signals are missing or weak. This does not mean the project is unsafe — it means an outside observer cannot easily verify the usual integrity checks. Treat with extra scrutiny.

Does Claude Video Vision publish package provenance?

No published build provenance is currently detected for Claude Video Vision. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.

Does Claude Video Vision have an OpenSSF Scorecard?

Claude Video Vision has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 4.8/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.

Is Claude Video Vision actively maintained?

Slowing down. Last push was 50 days ago — keep an eye on whether activity resumes.

What license does Claude Video Vision use?

Claude Video Vision ships under MIT. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.

Are Claude Video Vision's commits signed?

30% of the last 100 commits to Claude Video Vision are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface

Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support

high confidence

Implemented

Claude Video Vision appears to expose MCP server capabilities.

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

External Service Dependencies

high confidence

3 detected

Public provider/service dependencies detected.

Credential signal: API keys or service config markers documented.

Tool / Plugin Surface

high confidence

Declared

Declared plugin/integration surface detected.

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

Package Provenance Drift

N/A

No package source configured

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

MCP signal live
External deps live
Tool / plugin surface live
Package provenance drift live

How this surface has changed

Detected changes to Claude Video Vision's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.

2026-09-23

Tool Surface Changed

Detected tool/plugin surface changed: none → declared

2026-09-23

Provider Added

Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependencies: Anthropic, Google Gemini, OpenAI

2026-09-23

Mcp Status Changed

Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented

Maintain Claude Video Vision?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores Claude Video Vision from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Submit a correction → Add the trust badge

Reputation Timeline

Signal history

2026-09-25

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 24 spots (#250 → #274)

2026-09-23

Tool Surface Changed

Detected tool/plugin surface changed: none → declared

2026-09-23

Provider Added

Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependencies: Anthropic, Google Gemini, OpenAI

2026-09-23

Mcp Status Changed

Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented

2026-09-23

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 76 spots (#173 → #249)

2026-09-23

HVTrust Changed

HVTrust up 9.7pts (37.3 → 47.0)

2026-09-22

Newly Listed

First tracked at rank #173

2026-09-21

Removed From Active Tracking

Removed from active tracking

2026-09-12

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 11 spots (#231 → #242)

2026-09-06

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 13 spots (#183 → #196)

2026-09-05

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 12 spots (#171 → #183)

2026-09-01

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 13 spots (#139 → #152)

2026-08-31

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 18 spots (#121 → #139)

2026-08-30

Scorecard Added

OSSF Scorecard: 4.8/10

2026-08-30

Rank Moved

Rank rose 154 spots (#275 → #121)

2026-08-30

HVTrust Changed

HVTrust up 29.8pts (19.4 → 49.2)

2026-08-29

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 13 spots (#262 → #275)

2026-08-26

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 120 spots (#129 → #249)

2026-08-16

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 12 spots (#115 → #127)

2026-08-11

Newly Listed

First tracked at rank #116

GitHub →

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers

Markdown:
            [![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/claude-video-vision.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/claude-video-vision)
            
HTML:
            <a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/claude-video-vision"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/claude-video-vision.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in Agent Skills

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON