The Architect

A Claude Code plugin that interviews you, designs the whole architecture, and writes a self-contained blueprint another Claude Code instance builds from with zero context — EARS acceptance criteria and a runnable verify command on every build step. 14 project shapes, greenfield and brownfield.…

Agent Skills Listed MIT

Is The Architect safe? Thin or incomplete trust evidence. Review carefully before production use.

OSSF Scorecard 5.3 / 10
Provenance None
Signed commits 0%
Last push 74d ago
Compare The Architect
Suggest a correction

In detail: The Architect scores 44.3/100 (Grade D), ranked #298 of 371 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage C (2 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 5.3/10; recent commits are unsigned; last pushed 2026-07-28. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

How The Architect could raise its score

Each line changes one public signal and recomputes with the live scoring function. The gains don't add up exactly, because the score is capped near the top.

Chain of custody

Scanners check what the code says. This traces who ships The Architect and whether that has changed: from the source repository, through how changes are reviewed and released, to the code you run. These are the checks for OWASP ASI04 Agentic Supply Chain Vulnerabilities and, for skills, AST02 Supply Chain Compromise.

  1. Source Unsigned

    github.com/Hainrixz/the-architect, MIT, last pushed 2026-07-28. None of the last 100 commits carry a verified signature, so no change traces to a verified identity.

  2. Review and release Mixed

    OpenSSF Scorecard rates the repository's practices 5.3/10 (scanned Oct 10, 2026). The checks that decide who can get a change released:

    • Code Review0
    • Branch Protection0
    • Signed Releasesn/a
    • Dangerous Workflow10
    • Token Permissions10
    • Pinned Dependencies0
    All 18 Scorecard checks
    Binary-Artifacts 10
    Branch-Protection 0
    CI-Tests -1
    CII-Best-Practices 0
    Code-Review 0
    Contributors 0
    Dangerous-Workflow 10
    Dependency-Update-Tool 0
    Fuzzing 0
    License 10
    Maintained 10
    Packaging -1
    Pinned-Dependencies 0
    SAST 0
    Security-Policy 10
    Signed-Releases -1
    Token-Permissions 10
    Vulnerabilities 10
  3. Published packages None

    No registry package. The Architect is used from its repository, so what you run is whatever you check out: pin a release tag or commit.

Changes to this chain

  • 2026-08-27 OSSF Scorecard: 5.3/10

Evidence behind this score

Coverage C: 2 of 5 independent evidence types found.

  • GitHub repository data
  • Package downloads (missing)
  • Supply-chain checks
  • Public actions (missing)
  • Community mentions (missing)

Verify this score yourself

Every build re-issues The Architect’s score as an Ed25519-signed credential, valid for 7 days. You can check it offline against HVTracker’s published key; if anyone changes a number after signing, verification fails.

What this score doesn’t check

It covers who ships the code, not what the code does. It doesn’t read the skill’s instructions for injected instructions, watch runtime behaviour, or find bugs nobody has disclosed yet. For that, run a content scanner before you install it, such as Cisco Skill Scanner.

How The Architect compares in Agent Skills

  1. #296 Web Quality Skills 44.5 +0.2
  2. #297 Lieflat Charts 44.4 +0.1
  3. #298 The Architect 44.3 this agent
  4. #299 Skills Vote 44.3 ±0
  5. #300 N Skills 44.3 ±0

Bars show each HVTrust score; the tick marks The Architect’s 44.3.

Where the 44.3 comes from

HVTrust dimensions vs the Agent Skills average

44.3 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

The Architect Agent Skills average (371 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits
6.6 / 25
1.2 below avg 7.8
Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance
10.8 / 18
0.6 below avg 11.4
Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard
13.0 / 17
1.0 above avg 12.0
Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity
7.1 / 20
7.0 below avg 14.1
AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads
6.6 / 20
2.4 below avg 9.0

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It
Publish package provenance or release attestations for stronger supply-chain evidence.
Recent Changes
2026-09-25
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 22 spots (#262 → #284)
2026-09-23
Tool Surface Changed
Detected tool/plugin surface changed: none → declared
2026-09-23
Provider Added
Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependencies: Anthropic, Postgres
Maintainer Checklist
Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 5.3/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.
Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.
Increase signed commits Raise the share of verified-signed commits to make maintainer identity and release history easier to trust.
Refresh maintenance signals The repo was last pushed 74 days ago. Fresh activity helps separate stable projects from stale ones.
40.4
Activity sub-score · out of 100
#298

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade D reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage C is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (2 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Signals refreshed 2026-10-10 20:07 UTC · Repo last pushed 74 days ago

Rank Trend

2026-09-29 2026-10-10

Activity & Reach

Stars
537
Forks
101
Last Push
2026-07-28
74 days ago
Commits (4 wk)
0
Downloads (7d)
—
HN mentions (30d)
—
Open Issues
0
Rank Change
▼1
was #297

Analysis

Activity Inputs

40.4 / 100
StarsRepository reach
16.4 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
14.7 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
0.0 / 25
CommunityFork signal
9.3 / 20

Common questions about The Architect

Public trust evidence for The Architect is thin: several supply-chain signals are missing or weak. This does not mean the project is unsafe — it means an outside observer cannot easily verify the usual integrity checks. Treat with extra scrutiny.
Does The Architect publish package provenance?
No published build provenance is currently detected for The Architect. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.
Does The Architect have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
The Architect has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 5.3/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.
Is The Architect actively maintained?
Slowing down. Last push was 74 days ago — keep an eye on whether activity resumes.
What license does The Architect use?
The Architect ships under MIT. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are The Architect's commits signed?
0% of the last 100 commits to The Architect are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface
Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support
medium confidence
Implemented
The Architect appears to expose MCP server capabilities.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
External Service Dependencies
high confidence
2 detected
Public provider/service dependencies detected.
Credential signal: API keys or service config markers documented.
Tool / Plugin Surface
high confidence
Declared
Declared plugin/integration surface detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
N/A
No package source configured
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
  • MCP signal live
  • External deps live
  • Tool / plugin surface live
  • Package provenance drift live
How this surface has changed

Detected changes to The Architect's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.

2026-09-23
Tool Surface Changed
Detected tool/plugin surface changed: none → declared
2026-09-23
Provider Added
Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependencies: Anthropic, Postgres
2026-09-23
Mcp Status Changed
Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented

Maintain The Architect?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores The Architect from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Reputation Timeline

Signal history
Rank 10Listed 2HVTrust 2Score 1Scorecard 1Delisted 1MCP 1Surface 1Surface 1
2026-09-25
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 22 spots (#262 → #284)
2026-09-23
Tool Surface Changed
Detected tool/plugin surface changed: none → declared
2026-09-23
Provider Added
Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependencies: Anthropic, Postgres
2026-09-23
Mcp Status Changed
Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented
2026-09-23
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 81 spots (#180 → #261)
2026-09-23
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 8.6pts (36.7 → 45.3)
2026-09-22
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #180
2026-09-21
Removed From Active Tracking
Removed from active tracking
2026-09-11
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 11 spots (#232 → #243)
2026-09-05
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 14 spots (#192 → #206)
2026-09-01
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 15 spots (#158 → #173)
2026-08-31
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 18 spots (#140 → #158)
2026-08-30
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 25 spots (#115 → #140)
2026-08-29
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 27 spots (#88 → #115)
2026-08-28
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 20 spots (#68 → #88)
2026-08-27
Scorecard Added
OSSF Scorecard: 5.3/10
2026-08-27
Rank Moved
Rank rose 165 spots (#233 → #68)
2026-08-27
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 26.7pts (20.3 → 47.0)
2026-08-27
Activity Score Changed
Activity score down 14pts (60 → 46)
2026-08-26
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #233

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers
HVTrust 44.3 Grade D
Markdown:
[![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/the-architect.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/the-architect)
HTML:
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/the-architect"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/the-architect.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in Agent Skills

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.4 · Raw JSON