Is Claude Smart safe to use?

Claude Smart has an HVTrust score of 57.1/100 (Grade C), ranked #132 of 351 tracked AI agent projects. This score reflects verifiable supply-chain integrity, transparency, maintenance, and adoption signals.

What is the trust score for Claude Smart?

Claude Smart scores 57.1/100 on HVTracker's evidence-weighted HVTrust scale. It has 780 GitHub stars and is categorized under Agent Skills.

Claude Smart

ReflexioAI/claude-smart

Turns corrections into Preferences, Project-specific skills, and Shared skills for Claude Code, Codex, and OpenCode.

Agent Skills Python Listed Apache-2.0

Is Claude Smart safe? Promising trust profile, but some evidence still deserves review.

OSSF Scorecard 3.6 / 10

Provenance None

Signed commits 68%

Last push 3d ago

Compare Claude Smart

How does it stack up against its Agent Skills neighbours?

Pick any agent to compare →

Suggest a correction

In detail: Claude Smart scores 57.1/100 (Grade C), ranked #132 of 351 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage B (3 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 3.6/10; 68% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-09-23. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

How Claude Smart compares in Agent Skills

#130 Spellbook 57.4 +0.3
#131 Evolver 57.4 +0.3
#132 Claude Smart 57.1 this agent
#133 Rampstackco Claude Skills 56.9 −0.2
#134 Plinth 56.9 −0.2

Bars show each HVTrust score; the tick marks Claude Smart’s 57.1.

Where the 57.1 comes from

HVTrust dimensions vs the Agent Skills average

57.1 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

Claude Smart Agent Skills average (351 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits

7.9 / 25

in line with avg 8.1

Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance

10.8 / 18

0.6 below avg 11.4

Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard

11.6 / 17

0.6 below avg 12.2

Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity

13.0 / 20

1.2 below avg 14.2

AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads

10.6 / 20

1.6 above avg 9.0

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It

Publish package provenance or release attestations for stronger supply-chain evidence.

Recent Changes

2026-09-25

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 10 spots (#123 → #133)

2026-09-23

Tool Surface Changed

Detected tool/plugin surface changed: none → declared

2026-09-23

Provider Added

Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependencies: Anthropic, Multi-provider (LiteLLM)

Maintainer Checklist

Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 3.6/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.

Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.

Compare with another agent Get email alerts for Claude Smart View Agent Skills Report missing data

58.6

Activity sub-score · out of 100

#132

In Agent Skills

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade C reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage B is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (3 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Rank Trend

2026-08-11 2026-09-26

Activity & Reach

Stars

780

Forks

Last Push

2026-09-23

3 days ago

Commits (4 wk)

Downloads (7d)

562

npm

HN mentions (30d)

—

Open Issues

Rank Change

▲1

was #133

Analysis

Activity Inputs

58.6 / 100

StarsRepository reach

17.4 / 30

FreshnessLast push recency

24.6 / 25

ActivityRecent commits

7.5 / 25

CommunityFork signal

9.0 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance

None

No package attestations found

OSSF Scorecard

3.6 / 10

OpenSSF Scorecard · scanned Sep 26, 2026

Signed Commits

68%

of last 100 commits verified

Binary-Artifacts 10

Branch-Protection 0

CI-Tests 9

CII-Best-Practices 0

Code-Review 3

Contributors 0

Dangerous-Workflow 10

Dependency-Update-Tool 0

Fuzzing 0

License 10

Maintained 10

Packaging -1

Pinned-Dependencies 2

SAST 0

Security-Policy 0

Signed-Releases -1

Token-Permissions 0

Vulnerabilities 0

Common questions about Claude Smart

Claude Smart has a mixed signal profile. Some trust indicators are present, others are missing. Whether it is safe for your use case depends on which gaps matter to you — review the breakdown below before adopting in production.

Does Claude Smart publish package provenance?

No published build provenance is currently detected for Claude Smart. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.

Does Claude Smart have an OpenSSF Scorecard?

Claude Smart has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 3.6/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.

Is Claude Smart actively maintained?

Actively maintained. The repository was pushed to within the last 3 day(s).

What license does Claude Smart use?

Claude Smart ships under Apache-2.0. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.

Are Claude Smart's commits signed?

68% of the last 100 commits to Claude Smart are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface

Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support

None detected

No MCP server signal detected.

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

External Service Dependencies

high confidence

2 detected

Public provider/service dependencies detected.

Credential signal: No explicit API-key/config marker detected.

Tool / Plugin Surface

high confidence

Declared

Declared plugin/integration surface detected.

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

Package Provenance Drift

high confidence

Match

Published package metadata matches the tracked repo

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

MCP signal live
External deps live
Tool / plugin surface live
Package provenance drift live

How this surface has changed

Detected changes to Claude Smart's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.

2026-09-23

Tool Surface Changed

Detected tool/plugin surface changed: none → declared

2026-09-23

Provider Added

Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependencies: Anthropic, Multi-provider (LiteLLM)

2026-09-03

Provider Added

Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: Multi-provider (LiteLLM)

Maintain Claude Smart?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores Claude Smart from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Submit a correction → Add the trust badge

Reputation Timeline

Signal history

2026-09-25

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 10 spots (#123 → #133)

2026-09-23

Tool Surface Changed

Detected tool/plugin surface changed: none → declared

2026-09-23

Provider Added

Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependencies: Anthropic, Multi-provider (LiteLLM)

2026-09-23

Grade Changed

Trust grade D → C

2026-09-23

Rank Moved

Rank rose 179 spots (#299 → #120)

2026-09-23

HVTrust Changed

HVTrust up 30.8pts (26.5 → 57.3)

2026-09-22

Newly Listed

First tracked at rank #299

2026-09-21

Removed From Active Tracking

Removed from active tracking

2026-09-19

Rank Moved

Rank rose 19 spots (#142 → #123)

2026-09-19

Activity Score Changed

Activity score up 7pts (52 → 59)

2026-09-05

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 15 spots (#104 → #119)

2026-09-03

Provider Added

Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: Multi-provider (LiteLLM)

2026-09-03

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 20 spots (#77 → #97)

2026-08-29

Scorecard Added

OSSF Scorecard: 3.6/10

2026-08-29

Grade Changed

Trust grade D → C

2026-08-29

Rank Moved

Rank rose 81 spots (#129 → #48)

2026-08-29

HVTrust Changed

HVTrust up 23.3pts (35.2 → 58.5)

2026-08-28

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 25 spots (#104 → #129)

2026-08-27

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 22 spots (#82 → #104)

2026-08-26

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 54 spots (#28 → #82)

2026-08-11

Newly Listed

First tracked at rank #23

GitHub → npm: claude-smart

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers

Markdown:
            [![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/claude-smart.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/claude-smart)
            
HTML:
            <a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/claude-smart"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/claude-smart.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in Agent Skills

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · npm Registry (downloads, provenance) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON