Autoharness
Building the self-learning layer next-gen agents will ship with, learning skills from real work.
Is Autoharness safe? Promising trust profile, but some evidence still deserves review.
Compare Autoharness
How does it stack up against its Agent Skills neighbours?
Pick any agent to compare →In detail: Autoharness scores 62.8/100 (Grade C), ranked #86 of 384 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage C (2 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 4.7/10; 47% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-11-09. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →
How Autoharness could raise its score
Each line changes one public signal and recomputes with the live scoring function. The gains don't add up exactly, because the score is capped near the top.
- Raise the OSSF Scorecard from 4.7 to 9.0lowest checks: Branch-Protection 0, CII-Best-Practices 0, Dependency-Update-Tool 0 +9.0 → 71.8 B · #32 of 384
- Sign every commit47% signed today +2.7 → 65.5 B · #56 of 384
Chain of custody
Scanners check what the code says. This traces who ships Autoharness and whether that has changed: from the source repository, through how changes are reviewed and released, to the code you run. These are the checks for OWASP ASI04 Agentic Supply Chain Vulnerabilities and, for skills, AST02 Supply Chain Compromise.
-
Source Partly signed
github.com/tigerless-labs/autoharness, MIT, last pushed 2026-11-09. 47% of the last 100 commits carry a verified signature; the rest can't be tied to a verified identity.
-
Review and release Mixed
OpenSSF Scorecard rates the repository's practices 4.7/10 (scanned Nov 3, 2026). The checks that decide who can get a change released:
- Code Review6
- Branch Protection0
- Signed Releasesn/a
- Dangerous Workflow10
- Token Permissions0
- Pinned Dependencies0
All 18 Scorecard checks
Binary-Artifacts 10Branch-Protection 0CI-Tests 6CII-Best-Practices 0Code-Review 6Contributors 10Dangerous-Workflow 10Dependency-Update-Tool 0Fuzzing 0License 10Maintained 10Packaging -1Pinned-Dependencies 0SAST 0Security-Policy 0Signed-Releases -1Token-Permissions 0Vulnerabilities 10 -
Published packages None
No registry package. Autoharness is used from its repository, so what you run is whatever you check out: pin a release tag or commit.
Changes to this chain
- 2026-08-29 OSSF Scorecard: 3.4/10
Evidence behind this score
Coverage C: 2 of 5 independent evidence types found.
- GitHub repository data
- Package downloads (missing)
- Supply-chain checks
- Public actions (missing)
- Community mentions (missing)
Verify this score yourself
Every build re-issues Autoharness’s score as an Ed25519-signed credential, valid for 7 days. You can check it offline against HVTracker’s published key; if anyone changes a number after signing, verification fails.
What this score doesn’t check
It covers who ships the code, not what the code does. It doesn’t read the skill’s instructions for injected instructions, watch runtime behaviour, or find bugs nobody has disclosed yet. For that, run a content scanner before you install it, such as Cisco Skill Scanner.
How Autoharness compares in Agent Skills
- #84 Ui Ux Pro Max Skill 62.8 ±0
- #85 Oh Story Claudecode 62.8 ±0
- #86 Autoharness 62.8 this agent
- #87 Stop That Shit 62.4 −0.4
- #88 Claude Smart 62.3 −0.5
Bars show each HVTrust score; the tick marks Autoharness’s 62.8.
Where the 62.8 comes from
HVTrust dimensions vs the Agent Skills average
62.8 / 100 · 100.0% confidenceAutoharness Agent Skills average (384 agents)
Quick Trust Read
How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade C reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage C is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (2 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →
Rank Trend
Activity & Reach
Analysis
Activity Inputs
87.3 / 100Common questions about Autoharness
Does Autoharness publish package provenance?
Does Autoharness have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
Is Autoharness actively maintained?
What license does Autoharness use?
Are Autoharness's commits signed?
Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.
AI agent surface
MCP, providers, tool surface
These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →
- MCP signal live
- External deps live
- Tool / plugin surface live
- Package provenance drift live
Detected changes to Autoharness's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.
Maintain Autoharness?
For maintainers
HVTrust scores Autoharness from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.
Reputation Timeline
Signal history
Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →
For maintainers
[](https://hvtracker.net/agents/autoharness)
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/autoharness"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/autoharness.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>
Other agents in Agent Skills
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.4 · Raw JSON