Is DSH Vision Toolkit safe to use?

DSH Vision Toolkit has an HVTrust score of 62.8/100 (Grade C), ranked #74 of 359 tracked AI agent projects. This score reflects verifiable supply-chain integrity, transparency, maintenance, and adoption signals.

What is the trust score for DSH Vision Toolkit?

DSH Vision Toolkit scores 62.8/100 on HVTracker's evidence-weighted HVTrust scale. It has 887 GitHub stars and is categorized under Agent Skills.

DSH Vision Toolkit

Repository Website by Anionex

[dsh]为纯文本模型设计更强大的视觉工具箱：一行安装使用、粘贴图片直接识别、多张图片问答、截图到前端UI 还原等｜DeepSeek Harness-native integration for agent-vision-toolkit: image Q&A, long-screenshot OCR, UI restoration, grounding, pixel diff, Artifacts, and Web UI.

Agent Skills TypeScript Listed MIT

Is DSH Vision Toolkit safe? Promising trust profile, but some evidence still deserves review.

OSSF Scorecard 3.9 / 10

Provenance None

Signed commits 24%

Last push yesterday

Advisories None known

Compare DSH Vision Toolkit

How does it stack up against its Agent Skills neighbours?

Pick any agent to compare →

Suggest a correction

In detail: DSH Vision Toolkit scores 62.8/100 (Grade C), ranked #74 of 359 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage B (3 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 3.9/10; 24% of recent commits are signed; no published advisory affects its latest release (@anionex/dsh-vision-toolkit); last pushed 2026-09-30. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

How DSH Vision Toolkit could raise its score

Each line changes one public signal and recomputes with the live scoring function. The gains don't add up exactly, because the score is capped near the top.

Publish build provenance for its packagesnpm publish --provenance from CI +14.7 → 77.5 B · #23 of 359
Raise the OSSF Scorecard from 3.9 to 9.0lowest checks: Branch-Protection 0, CII-Best-Practices 0, Code-Review 0 +10.6 → 73.4 B · #29 of 359
Sign every commit24% signed today +3.8 → 66.6 B · #48 of 359

Already done? Suggest a correction Add the trust badge

How DSH Vision Toolkit compares in Agent Skills

Bars show each HVTrust score; the tick marks DSH Vision Toolkit’s 62.8.

Where the 62.8 comes from

HVTrust dimensions vs the Agent Skills average

62.8 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

DSH Vision Toolkit Agent Skills average (359 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits

6.1 / 25

1.9 below avg 8.0

Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance

10.8 / 18

0.6 below avg 11.4

Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard

11.8 / 17

in line with avg 12.2

Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity

18.5 / 20

4.3 above avg 14.2

AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads

11.6 / 20

2.6 above avg 9.0

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It

Publish package provenance or release attestations for stronger supply-chain evidence.

Recent Changes

2026-09-23

Provider Added

Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: DeepSeek

2026-09-23

Grade Changed

Trust grade D → C

2026-09-23

Rank Moved

Rank rose 205 spots (#269 → #64)

Maintainer Checklist

Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 3.9/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.

Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.

Increase signed commits Raise the share of verified-signed commits to make maintainer identity and release history easier to trust.

Compare with another agent Get email alerts for DSH Vision Toolkit View Agent Skills Report missing data

70.9

Activity sub-score · out of 100

#74

In Agent Skills

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade C reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage B is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (3 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Rank Trend

2026-09-29 2026-09-30

Activity & Reach

Stars

887

Forks

Last Push

2026-09-30

yesterday

Commits (4 wk)

Downloads (7d)

2,580

npm

HN mentions (30d)

—

Open Issues

Rank Change

▲1

was #75

Analysis

Activity Inputs

70.9 / 100

StarsRepository reach

17.7 / 30

FreshnessLast push recency

24.9 / 25

ActivityRecent commits

20.4 / 25

CommunityFork signal

7.8 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance

None

No package attestations found

OSSF Scorecard

3.9 / 10

OpenSSF Scorecard · scanned Sep 30, 2026

Signed Commits

24%

of last 100 commits verified

Binary-Artifacts 10

Branch-Protection 0

CI-Tests 10

CII-Best-Practices 0

Code-Review 0

Contributors 3

Dangerous-Workflow 10

Dependency-Update-Tool 0

Fuzzing 0

License 10

Maintained 0

Packaging -1

Pinned-Dependencies 0

SAST 0

Security-Policy 10

Signed-Releases -1

Token-Permissions 10

Vulnerabilities 0

Common questions about DSH Vision Toolkit

DSH Vision Toolkit has a mixed signal profile. Some trust indicators are present, others are missing. Whether it is safe for your use case depends on which gaps matter to you — review the breakdown below before adopting in production.

Does DSH Vision Toolkit publish package provenance?

No published build provenance is currently detected for DSH Vision Toolkit. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.

Does DSH Vision Toolkit have an OpenSSF Scorecard?

DSH Vision Toolkit has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 3.9/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.

Is DSH Vision Toolkit actively maintained?

Actively maintained. The repository was pushed to within the last 1 day(s).

What license does DSH Vision Toolkit use?

DSH Vision Toolkit ships under MIT. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.

Are DSH Vision Toolkit's commits signed?

24% of the last 100 commits to DSH Vision Toolkit are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface

Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support

None detected

No MCP server signal detected.

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

External Service Dependencies

high confidence

1 detected

Public provider/service dependencies detected.

DeepSeek

Credential signal: No explicit API-key/config marker detected.

Tool / Plugin Surface

None detected

No clear plugin system or broad tool surface detected.

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

Package Provenance Drift

high confidence

Match

Published package metadata matches the tracked repo

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

MCP signal live
External deps live
Tool / plugin surface live
Package provenance drift live

How this surface has changed

Detected changes to DSH Vision Toolkit's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.

2026-09-23

Provider Added

Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: DeepSeek

Maintain DSH Vision Toolkit?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores DSH Vision Toolkit from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Submit a correction → Add the trust badge

Reputation Timeline

Signal history

2026-09-23

Provider Added

Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: DeepSeek

2026-09-23

Grade Changed

Trust grade D → C

2026-09-23

Rank Moved

Rank rose 205 spots (#269 → #64)

2026-09-23

HVTrust Changed

HVTrust up 33.5pts (30.7 → 64.2)

2026-09-22

Newly Listed

First tracked at rank #269

2026-09-21

Removed From Active Tracking

Removed from active tracking

2026-09-19

Grade Changed

Trust grade B → C

2026-09-05

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 11 spots (#27 → #38)

2026-09-03

Scorecard Added

OSSF Scorecard: 4.8/10

2026-09-03

Grade Changed

Trust grade D → B

2026-09-03

Rank Moved

Rank rose 205 spots (#228 → #23)

2026-09-03

HVTrust Changed

HVTrust up 27.7pts (38.9 → 66.6)

2026-09-02

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 12 spots (#216 → #228)

2026-09-01

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 13 spots (#203 → #216)

2026-08-31

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 16 spots (#187 → #203)

2026-08-30

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 32 spots (#155 → #187)

2026-08-29

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 38 spots (#117 → #155)

2026-08-28

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 26 spots (#91 → #117)

2026-08-27

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 21 spots (#70 → #91)

2026-08-26

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 49 spots (#21 → #70)

2026-08-16

Newly Listed

First tracked at rank #20

GitHub → Website → npm: @anionex/dsh-vision-toolkit

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers

Markdown:
            [![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/dsh-vision-toolkit.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/dsh-vision-toolkit)
            
HTML:
            <a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/dsh-vision-toolkit"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/dsh-vision-toolkit.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in Agent Skills

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · npm Registry (downloads, provenance) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.4 · Raw JSON