BrowserOS

🌐 The open-source Agentic browser; alternative to ChatGPT Atlas, Perplexity Comet, Dia.

Browser & Computer Use TypeScript Grade B Listed AGPL-3.0
65.7/100
Rank #222 of 1308
Compare BrowserOS

How does it stack up against its Browser & Computer Use neighbours?

Pick any agent to compare →

Promising trust profile, but some evidence still deserves review.

Open compare tool Suggest correction
Listing state
Listed
Evidence coverage
Grade C · 2/5 signals
Last push
2026-08-19 · 0d ago
Recent change
Rank +4

Is BrowserOS safe? BrowserOS scores 65.7/100 (Grade B), ranked #222 of 1308 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage C (2 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 4.7/10; 99% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-08-19. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

Ranked neighbours in Browser & Computer Use

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It
Publish package provenance or release attestations for stronger supply-chain evidence.
Recent Changes
2026-08-19
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 13 spots (#209 → #222)
2026-08-17
Rank Moved
Rank rose 14 spots (#221 → #207)
2026-08-13
Grade Changed
Trust grade C → B
Maintainer Checklist
Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 4.7/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.
Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.
89.3
Activity sub-score · out of 100
#11

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade B reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage C is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (2 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Signals refreshed 2026-08-19 06:02 UTC · Repo last pushed today

Rank Trend

2026-08-11 2026-08-19

Activity & Reach

Stars
13.2k
Forks
1.4k
Last Push
2026-08-19
today
Commits (4 wk)
416
Downloads (7d)
HN mentions (30d)
Open Issues
56
Rank Change
▼13
was #209

Analysis

HVTrust Dimensions vs Browser & Computer Use

65.7 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

BrowserOS Browser & Computer Use average (41 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits
10.8 / 25
3.4 above avg 7.4
Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance
10.8 / 18
1.6 below avg 12.4
Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard
12.5 / 17
1.8 above avg 10.7
Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity
20.0 / 20
7.0 above avg 13.0
AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads
9.9 / 20
1.3 below avg 11.2

Activity Inputs

89.3 / 100
StarsRepository reach
24.7 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
25.0 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
25 / 25
CommunityFork signal
14.6 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance
None
No package attestations found
OSSF Scorecard
4.7 / 10
OpenSSF Scorecard · scanned Aug 19, 2026
Signed Commits
99%
of last 100 commits verified
Binary-Artifacts 9
Branch-Protection 3
CI-Tests 1
CII-Best-Practices 0
Code-Review 0
Contributors 10
Dangerous-Workflow 10
Dependency-Update-Tool 10
Fuzzing 0
License 10
Maintained 10
Packaging 10
Pinned-Dependencies 0
SAST 0
Security-Policy 10
Signed-Releases 0
Token-Permissions 0
Vulnerabilities 0

Is BrowserOS safe?

BrowserOS has a mixed signal profile. Some trust indicators are present, others are missing. Whether it is safe for your use case depends on which gaps matter to you — review the breakdown below before adopting in production.
Does BrowserOS publish package provenance?
No published build provenance is currently detected for BrowserOS. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.
Does BrowserOS have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
BrowserOS has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 4.7/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.
Is BrowserOS actively maintained?
Actively maintained. The repository was pushed to within the last 1 day(s).
What license does BrowserOS use?
BrowserOS ships under AGPL-3.0. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are BrowserOS's commits signed?
99% of the last 100 commits to BrowserOS are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface
Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support
high confidence
Implemented
BrowserOS appears to expose MCP server capabilities.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
External Service Dependencies
medium confidence
1 detected
Public provider/service dependencies detected.
Credential signal: No explicit API-key/config marker detected.
Tool / Plugin Surface
high confidence
Declared
Declared plugin/integration surface detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
N/A
No package source configured
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
  • MCP signal live
  • External deps live
  • Tool / plugin surface live
  • Package provenance drift live
How this surface has changed

Detected changes to BrowserOS's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.

2026-08-12
Tool Surface Changed
Detected tool/plugin surface changed: extension-based → declared

Maintain BrowserOS?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores BrowserOS from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Reputation Timeline

Signal history
Rank 6Listed 1Scorecard 1Surface 1Grade 1
2026-08-19
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 13 spots (#209 → #222)
2026-08-17
Rank Moved
Rank rose 14 spots (#221 → #207)
2026-08-13
Grade Changed
Trust grade C → B
2026-08-12
Tool Surface Changed
Detected tool/plugin surface changed: extension-based → declared
2026-08-12
Rank Moved
Rank rose 17 spots (#244 → #227)
2026-08-10
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 20 spots (#223 → #243)
2026-08-08
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 44 spots (#171 → #215)
2026-08-07
Scorecard Added
OSSF Scorecard: 4.8/10
2026-07-29
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 11 spots (#408 → #419)
2026-07-28
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #408

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers
HVTrust 65.7 Grade B
Markdown:
[![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/browseros.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/browseros)
HTML:
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/browseros"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/browseros.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in Browser & Computer Use

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON