Registry › Compare › Browser Use vs BrowserOS

Browser Use vs BrowserOS

Browser Use leads on trust: 73.0/100 (Grade B) against 66.5/100 (Grade B), a 6.5-point gap. Browser Use leads on adoption and rests on broader evidence; BrowserOS leads on supply-chain integrity.

B Browser Use 73.0

Open-source Python library for AI browser agents, plus Browser Use Cloud: stealth browsers and a hosted agent API.

browser-use/browser-use · #306 overall · #11 Browser & Computer Use · coverage A (4/5)

Choose Browser Use if adoption matters most.

+10.0Adoption: 120.5k GitHub stars against 14.3k
A vs CEvidence coverage: 4 of 5 independent signal types, against 2

B BrowserOS 66.5

🌐 The open-source Agentic browser; alternative to ChatGPT Atlas, Perplexity Comet, Dia.

browseros-ai/BrowserOS · #477 overall · #14 Browser & Computer Use · coverage C (2/5)

Choose BrowserOS if supply-chain integrity matters most.

+2.7Safety / Integrity: 99% of recent commits signed, against 47%

Where they differ

8.5

Safety / IntegrityBrowserOS +2.7

11.2

12.7

TransparencyBrowserOS +0.1

12.8

20.0

AdoptionBrowser Use +10.0

10.0

+1.0

Runtime calibrationBrowserOS +0.7

+1.7

2 dimensions identical: Identity 10.8 · Maintenance 20.0 · Full evidence table

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Browser Use and BrowserOS, two Browser & Computer Use projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Full evidence

Signal	Browser Usebrowser-use/browser-use	BrowserOSbrowseros-ai/BrowserOS
HVTrust score	73.0	66.5
Evidence grade	B	B
Coverage grade	A	C
Overall rank	#306	#477
Rank in Browser & Computer Use	#11	#14
GitHub stars	120.5k	14.3k
Last updated	today	today
Build provenance	No	No
OSSF Scorecard	4.9 / 10	5.0 / 10
License	MIT	AGPL-3.0
Downloads	1.6M/wk	—
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25	8.5	11.2
Identity & provenance / 18	10.8	10.8
Transparency / 17	12.7	12.8
Maintenance / 20	20.0	20.0
Adoption / 20	20.0	10.0
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server	Declared	Implemented
External providers	5 — Amazon Bedrock, Anthropic, Google Gemini, …	1 — Amazon Bedrock
Requires API keys	Yes	No
Plugin surface	—	plugins
Provenance drift	Match	—

Open in the live compare tool → Browser Use profile BrowserOS profile More Browser & Computer Use →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.4 →