Is Brainstorm MCP safe to use?

Brainstorm MCP has an HVTrust score of 33.0/100 (Grade D), ranked #1171 of 1320 tracked AI agent projects. This score reflects verifiable supply-chain integrity, transparency, maintenance, and adoption signals.

What is the trust score for Brainstorm MCP?

Brainstorm MCP scores 33.0/100 on HVTracker's evidence-weighted HVTrust scale. It has 69 GitHub stars and is categorized under MCP Servers.

Brainstorm MCP

spranab/brainstorm-mcp

A single model's confident answer can still be wrong, so brainstorm-mcp runs multi-round debates between GPT, Gemini, De

MCP Servers TypeScript Grade D Listed MIT

33.0/100

Rank #1171 of 1320

Compare Brainstorm MCP

How does it stack up against its MCP Servers neighbours?

Pick any agent to compare →

Thin or incomplete trust evidence. Review carefully before production use.

Open compare tool Suggest correction

Listing state

Listed

Evidence coverage

Grade C · 2/5 signals

Last push

2026-09-02 · 2d ago

Recent change

Provider Added +9

Is Brainstorm MCP safe? Brainstorm MCP scores 33.0/100 (Grade D), ranked #1171 of 1320 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage C (2 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 3.3/10; 5% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-09-02. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

Ranked neighbours in MCP Servers

#679 Hummingbot MCP — 33.4 (D) → #680 MeiGen AI Design MCP — 33.3 (D) → #682 Ryaker Appstore Connect MCP — 32.9 (D) → #683 MCP Sap Docs — 32.7 (D) →

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It

Publish package provenance or release attestations for stronger supply-chain evidence.

Recent Changes

2026-09-03

Provider Added

Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: Anthropic

2026-09-03

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 68 spots (#1097 → #1165)

2026-09-02

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 38 spots (#1059 → #1097)

Maintainer Checklist

Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 3.3/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.

Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.

Increase signed commits Raise the share of verified-signed commits to make maintainer identity and release history easier to trust.

Compare with another agent Get email alerts for Brainstorm MCP View MCP Servers Report missing data

49.9

Activity sub-score · out of 100

#681

In MCP Servers

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade D reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage C is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (2 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Rank Trend

2026-08-11 2026-09-04

Activity & Reach

Stars

Forks

Last Push

2026-09-02

2 days ago

Commits (4 wk)

Downloads (7d)

—

HN mentions (30d)

—

Open Issues

Rank Change

▼6

was #1165

Analysis

HVTrust Dimensions vs MCP Servers

33.0 / 100 · 67.0% confidence

Brainstorm MCP MCP Servers average (778 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits

4.4 / 25

5.1 below avg 9.5

Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance

10.8 / 18

2.6 below avg 13.4

Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard

11.3 / 17

in line with avg 11.8

Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity

13.4 / 20

1.2 above avg 12.2

AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads

4.4 / 20

1.8 below avg 6.2

Activity Inputs

49.9 / 100

StarsRepository reach

11.1 / 30

FreshnessLast push recency

24.7 / 25

ActivityRecent commits

9.7 / 25

CommunityFork signal

4.2 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance

None

No package attestations found

OSSF Scorecard

3.3 / 10

OpenSSF Scorecard · scanned Sep 2, 2026

Signed Commits

of last 100 commits verified

Binary-Artifacts 10

Branch-Protection 0

CI-Tests 0

CII-Best-Practices 0

Code-Review 0

Contributors 10

Dangerous-Workflow 10

Dependency-Update-Tool 0

Fuzzing 0

License 10

Maintained 3

Packaging 10

Pinned-Dependencies 4

SAST 0

Security-Policy 0

Signed-Releases -1

Token-Permissions 0

Vulnerabilities 0

Is Brainstorm MCP safe?

Public trust evidence for Brainstorm MCP is thin: several supply-chain signals are missing or weak. This does not mean the project is unsafe — it means an outside observer cannot easily verify the usual integrity checks. Treat with extra scrutiny.

Does Brainstorm MCP publish package provenance?

No published build provenance is currently detected for Brainstorm MCP. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.

Does Brainstorm MCP have an OpenSSF Scorecard?

Brainstorm MCP has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 3.3/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.

Is Brainstorm MCP actively maintained?

Actively maintained. The repository was pushed to within the last 2 day(s).

What license does Brainstorm MCP use?

Brainstorm MCP ships under MIT. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.

Are Brainstorm MCP's commits signed?

5% of the last 100 commits to Brainstorm MCP are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface

Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support

high confidence

Implemented

Brainstorm MCP appears to expose MCP server capabilities.

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

External Service Dependencies

high confidence

4 detected

Public provider/service dependencies detected.

Credential signal: API keys or service config markers documented.

Tool / Plugin Surface

None detected

No clear plugin system or broad tool surface detected.

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

Package Provenance Drift

high confidence

Match

Published package metadata matches the tracked repo

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

MCP signal live
External deps live
Tool / plugin surface live
Package provenance drift live

How this surface has changed

Detected changes to Brainstorm MCP's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.

2026-09-03

Provider Added

Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: Anthropic

2026-08-14

Activity Resumed

Activity resumed

Maintain Brainstorm MCP?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores Brainstorm MCP from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Submit a correction → Add the trust badge

Reputation Timeline

Signal history

2026-09-03

Provider Added

Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: Anthropic

2026-09-03

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 68 spots (#1097 → #1165)

2026-09-02

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 38 spots (#1059 → #1097)

2026-09-01

Scorecard Added

OSSF Scorecard: 3.3/10

2026-09-01

Rank Moved

Rank rose 198 spots (#1257 → #1059)

2026-09-01

HVTrust Changed

HVTrust up 15.5pts (18.9 → 34.4)

2026-08-31

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 17 spots (#1240 → #1257)

2026-08-30

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 19 spots (#1221 → #1240)

2026-08-29

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 13 spots (#1208 → #1221)

2026-08-28

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 16 spots (#1192 → #1208)

2026-08-27

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 16 spots (#1176 → #1192)

2026-08-26

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 48 spots (#1128 → #1176)

2026-08-24

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 13 spots (#1114 → #1127)

2026-08-18

Rank Moved

Rank rose 11 spots (#1128 → #1117)

2026-08-16

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 25 spots (#1112 → #1137)

2026-08-14

Activity Resumed

Activity resumed

2026-08-14

Rank Moved

Rank rose 124 spots (#1234 → #1110)

2026-08-14

HVTrust Changed

HVTrust up 3.7pts (15.4 → 19.1)

2026-08-14

Activity Score Changed

Activity score up 21pts (25 → 46)

2026-08-10

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 77 spots (#1155 → #1232)

2026-08-08

Newly Listed

First tracked at rank #1154

GitHub → npm: brainstorm-mcp

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers

Markdown:
            [![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/brainstorm-mcp.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/brainstorm-mcp)
            
HTML:
            <a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/brainstorm-mcp"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/brainstorm-mcp.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in MCP Servers

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · npm Registry (downloads, provenance) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON