updated 2026-08-12 05:02 UTC

Pagerduty MCP Server

PagerDuty/pagerduty-mcp-server

PagerDuty's official local MCP (Model Context Protocol) server which provides tools to interact with your PagerDuty acco

MCP Servers Python Grade D Listed Apache-2.0
29.1/100
Rank #775 of 1283
Compare Pagerduty MCP Server

How does it stack up against its MCP Servers neighbours?

Pick any agent to compare →

Thin or incomplete trust evidence. Review carefully before production use.

Open compare tool Suggest correction
Listing state
Listed
Evidence coverage
Grade C · 2/5 signals
Last push
2026-07-15 · 28d ago
Recent change
Rank +2

Is Pagerduty MCP Server safe? Pagerduty MCP Server scores 29.1/100 (Grade D), ranked #775 of 1283 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage C (2 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; no OSSF Scorecard result yet; 23% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-07-15. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

Ranked neighbours in MCP Servers

#363 SunoMCP — 29.4 (D) → #364 Opendocswork MCP — 29.4 (D) → #366 Weapp Agent MCP — 29.1 (D) → #367 Bhived MCP — 29.1 (D) →

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It
Add or improve OSSF Scorecard coverage so safety checks are easier to verify.
Recent Changes
2026-08-10
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 41 spots (#733 → #774)
2026-08-09
Activity Score Changed
Activity score down 6pts (50 → 44)
2026-08-08
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #719
Maintainer Checklist
Add Scorecard coverage Expose the repository to OpenSSF Scorecard checks so supply-chain posture is easier to verify.
Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.
Increase signed commits Raise the share of verified-signed commits to make maintainer identity and release history easier to trust.
Compare with another agent Get email alerts for Pagerduty MCP Server View MCP Servers Report missing data
43.7
Activity sub-score · out of 100
#365
In MCP Servers

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade D reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage C is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (2 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Signals refreshed 2026-08-12 05:02 UTC · Repo last pushed 28 days ago

Rank Trend

2026-08-11 2026-08-12

Activity & Reach

Stars
75
Forks
39
Last Push
2026-07-15
28 days ago
Commits (4 wk)
1
Downloads (7d)
24,252
pypi
HN mentions (30d)
—
Open Issues
18
Rank Change
=
was #775

Analysis

HVTrust Dimensions vs MCP Servers

29.1 / 100 · 67.0% confidence

Pagerduty MCP Server MCP Servers average (761 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits
1.2 / 25
3.8 below avg 5.0
Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance
10.8 / 18
2.5 below avg 13.3
Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard
8.5 / 17
in line with avg 8.8
Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity
11.3 / 20
1.1 below avg 12.4
AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads
10.4 / 20
4.6 above avg 5.8

Activity Inputs

43.7 / 100
StarsRepository reach
11.3 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
21.1 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
3.8 / 25
CommunityFork signal
7.4 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance
None
No package attestations found
OSSF Scorecard
—
Not available
Signed Commits
23%
of last 100 commits verified

Is Pagerduty MCP Server safe?

Public trust evidence for Pagerduty MCP Server is thin: several supply-chain signals are missing or weak. This does not mean the project is unsafe — it means an outside observer cannot easily verify the usual integrity checks. Treat with extra scrutiny.
Does Pagerduty MCP Server publish package provenance?
No published build provenance is currently detected for Pagerduty MCP Server. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.
Does Pagerduty MCP Server have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
No OpenSSF Scorecard data is currently published for Pagerduty MCP Server. Maintainers can enable the Scorecard GitHub Action to get a public score; without it, automated supply-chain hygiene is harder for outsiders to verify.
Is Pagerduty MCP Server actively maintained?
Maintained. Last push was 28 days ago.
What license does Pagerduty MCP Server use?
Pagerduty MCP Server ships under Apache-2.0. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are Pagerduty MCP Server's commits signed?
23% of the last 100 commits to Pagerduty MCP Server are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface
Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support
medium confidence
Implemented
Pagerduty MCP Server appears to expose MCP server capabilities.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
External Service Dependencies
low confidence
None detected
No clear third-party provider dependency detected.
Credential signal: API keys or service config markers documented.
Tool / Plugin Surface
None detected
No clear plugin system or broad tool surface detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
low confidence
Unknown
Package source metadata is missing or inconclusive
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
  • MCP signal live
  • External deps live
  • Tool / plugin surface live
  • Package provenance drift live

Maintain Pagerduty MCP Server?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores Pagerduty MCP Server from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Submit a correction → Add the trust badge

Reputation Timeline

Signal history
Listed 1Score 1Rank 1
2026-08-10
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 41 spots (#733 → #774)
2026-08-09
Activity Score Changed
Activity score down 6pts (50 → 44)
2026-08-08
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #719
GitHub → PyPI: pagerduty-mcp

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers
HVTrust 29.1 Grade D
Markdown:
[![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/pagerduty-mcp-server.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/pagerduty-mcp-server)
HTML:
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/pagerduty-mcp-server"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/pagerduty-mcp-server.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in MCP Servers

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · PyPI / pypistats (downloads, provenance)
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON