updated 2026-09-26 06:32 UTC

N8n MCP

AutomateLab-tech/n8n-mcp

Debugging-first MCP server for n8n. Tools for workflow generation, linting, per-node execution diagnosis, and driving live n8n instances. Built for AI agents.

MCP Servers TypeScript Listed MIT

Is N8n MCP safe? Thin or incomplete trust evidence. Review carefully before production use.

OSSF Scorecard 2.9 / 10
Provenance None
Signed commits 0%
Last push 110d ago
Compare N8n MCP

How does it stack up against its MCP Servers neighbours?

Pick any agent to compare →
Suggest a correction

In detail: N8n MCP scores 33.0/100 (Grade D), ranked #1267 of 1325 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage C (2 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 2.9/10; recent commits are unsigned; last pushed 2026-06-08. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

How N8n MCP compares in MCP Servers

  1. #757 Banco MCP 33.3 +0.3
  2. #758 Fathom MCP Server 33.3 +0.3
  3. #759 N8n MCP 33.0 this agent
  4. #760 Nanobanana MCP Server 32.7 −0.3
  5. #761 Academia MCP 32.6 −0.4

Bars show each HVTrust score; the tick marks N8n MCP’s 33.0.

Where the 33.0 comes from

HVTrust dimensions vs the MCP Servers average

33.0 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

N8n MCP MCP Servers average (775 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits
3.6 / 25
6.7 below avg 10.3
Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance
10.8 / 18
2.6 below avg 13.4
Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard
11.0 / 17
1.2 below avg 12.2
Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity
4.7 / 20
7.4 below avg 12.1
AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads
2.7 / 20
4.5 below avg 7.2

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It
Publish package provenance or release attestations for stronger supply-chain evidence.
Recent Changes
2026-09-23
Tool Surface Changed
Detected tool/plugin surface changed: none → declared
2026-09-23
Provider Added
Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependencies: Anthropic, Google Gemini
2026-09-23
Mcp Status Changed
Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented
Maintainer Checklist
Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 2.9/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.
Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.
Increase signed commits Raise the share of verified-signed commits to make maintainer identity and release history easier to trust.
Refresh maintenance signals The repo was last pushed 110 days ago. Fresh activity helps separate stable projects from stale ones.
Compare with another agent Get email alerts for N8n MCP View MCP Servers Report missing data
16.6
Activity sub-score · out of 100
#759
In MCP Servers

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade D reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage C is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (2 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Signals refreshed 2026-09-26 06:32 UTC · Repo last pushed 110 days ago

Rank Trend

2026-08-11 2026-09-26

Activity & Reach

Stars
12
Forks
0
Last Push
2026-06-08
110 days ago
Commits (4 wk)
0
Downloads (7d)
—
HN mentions (30d)
—
Open Issues
1
Rank Change
▲1
was #1268

Analysis

Activity Inputs

16.6 / 100
StarsRepository reach
6.7 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
9.7 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
0.0 / 25
CommunityFork signal
0.0 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance
None
No package attestations found
OSSF Scorecard
2.9 / 10
OpenSSF Scorecard · scanned Sep 23, 2026
Signed Commits
0%
of last 100 commits verified
Binary-Artifacts 10
Branch-Protection 0
CI-Tests -1
CII-Best-Practices 0
Code-Review 0
Contributors 3
Dangerous-Workflow 10
Dependency-Update-Tool 0
Fuzzing 0
License 10
Maintained 0
Packaging -1
Pinned-Dependencies 1
SAST 0
Security-Policy 10
Signed-Releases -1
Token-Permissions 0
Vulnerabilities 0

Common questions about N8n MCP

Public trust evidence for N8n MCP is thin: several supply-chain signals are missing or weak. This does not mean the project is unsafe — it means an outside observer cannot easily verify the usual integrity checks. Treat with extra scrutiny.
Does N8n MCP publish package provenance?
No published build provenance is currently detected for N8n MCP. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.
Does N8n MCP have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
N8n MCP has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 2.9/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.
Is N8n MCP actively maintained?
Slowing down. Last push was 110 days ago — keep an eye on whether activity resumes.
What license does N8n MCP use?
N8n MCP ships under MIT. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are N8n MCP's commits signed?
0% of the last 100 commits to N8n MCP are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface
Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support
high confidence
Implemented
N8n MCP appears to expose MCP server capabilities.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
External Service Dependencies
high confidence
2 detected
Public provider/service dependencies detected.
Credential signal: API keys or service config markers documented.
Tool / Plugin Surface
medium confidence
Declared
Declared plugin/integration surface detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
N/A
No package source configured
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
  • MCP signal live
  • External deps live
  • Tool / plugin surface live
  • Package provenance drift live
How this surface has changed

Detected changes to N8n MCP's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.

2026-09-23
Tool Surface Changed
Detected tool/plugin surface changed: none → declared
2026-09-23
Provider Added
Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependencies: Anthropic, Google Gemini
2026-09-23
Mcp Status Changed
Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented
2026-09-06
Activity Went Stale
No commits for 90 days

Maintain N8n MCP?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores N8n MCP from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Submit a correction → Add the trust badge

Reputation Timeline

Signal history
Rank 18Listed 2HVTrust 2Scorecard 1Stale 1Delisted 1MCP 1Surface 1Surface 1
2026-09-23
Tool Surface Changed
Detected tool/plugin surface changed: none → declared
2026-09-23
Provider Added
Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependencies: Anthropic, Google Gemini
2026-09-23
Mcp Status Changed
Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented
2026-09-23
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 248 spots (#1016 → #1264)
2026-09-23
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 8.7pts (24.5 → 33.2)
2026-09-22
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #1016
2026-09-21
Removed From Active Tracking
Removed from active tracking
2026-09-09
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 10 spots (#1228 → #1238)
2026-09-08
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 11 spots (#1217 → #1228)
2026-09-07
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 18 spots (#1199 → #1217)
2026-09-06
Activity Went Stale
No commits for 90 days
2026-09-06
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 18 spots (#1181 → #1199)
2026-09-05
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 30 spots (#1151 → #1181)
2026-09-04
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 17 spots (#1134 → #1151)
2026-09-03
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 49 spots (#1085 → #1134)
2026-09-02
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 45 spots (#1040 → #1085)
2026-09-01
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 41 spots (#999 → #1040)
2026-08-31
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 35 spots (#964 → #999)
2026-08-30
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 49 spots (#915 → #964)
2026-08-29
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 50 spots (#865 → #915)
2026-08-28
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 31 spots (#834 → #865)
2026-08-27
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 24 spots (#810 → #834)
2026-08-26
Scorecard Added
OSSF Scorecard: 3.2/10
2026-08-26
Rank Moved
Rank rose 462 spots (#1272 → #810)
2026-08-26
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 21.0pts (14.6 → 35.6)
2026-08-16
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 28 spots (#1242 → #1270)
2026-08-10
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 77 spots (#1161 → #1238)
2026-08-08
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #1159
GitHub →

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers
HVTrust 33.0 Grade D
Markdown:
[![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/automatelab-tech-n8n-mcp.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/automatelab-tech-n8n-mcp)
HTML:
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/automatelab-tech-n8n-mcp"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/automatelab-tech-n8n-mcp.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in MCP Servers

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON