Perplexity Comet MCP
MCP server connecting Claude Code to Perplexity Comet browser. Autonomous web browsing, agentic research, multi-tab management. Windows/WSL/macOS support. Smart completion detection, auto-reconnect, tab protection. Enhanced fork with 7 tools including comet_tabs.
Is Perplexity Comet MCP safe? Thin or incomplete trust evidence. Review carefully before production use.
Compare Perplexity Comet MCP
How does it stack up against its MCP Servers neighbours?
Pick any agent to compare →In detail: Perplexity Comet MCP scores 45.4/100 (Grade D), ranked #1054 of 1325 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage B (3 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 2.9/10; 27% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-06-22. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →
How Perplexity Comet MCP compares in MCP Servers
- #617 Slack Explorer MCP 45.4 ±0
- #618 Memory MCP 45.4 ±0
- #619 Perplexity Comet MCP 45.4 this agent
- #620 Claude Context 45.4 ±0
- #621 Google Knowledge Graph MCP 45.3 −0.1
Bars show each HVTrust score; the tick marks Perplexity Comet MCP’s 45.4.
Where the 45.4 comes from
HVTrust dimensions vs the MCP Servers average
45.4 / 100 · 100.0% confidencePerplexity Comet MCP MCP Servers average (775 agents)
Quick Trust Read
How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade D reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage B is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (3 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →
Rank Trend
Activity & Reach
Analysis
Activity Inputs
28.1 / 100Supply Chain Trust
Common questions about Perplexity Comet MCP
Does Perplexity Comet MCP publish package provenance?
Does Perplexity Comet MCP have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
Is Perplexity Comet MCP actively maintained?
What license does Perplexity Comet MCP use?
Are Perplexity Comet MCP's commits signed?
Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.
AI agent surface
MCP, providers, tool surface
These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →
- MCP signal live
- External deps live
- Tool / plugin surface live
- Package provenance drift live
Detected changes to Perplexity Comet MCP's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.
Maintain Perplexity Comet MCP?
For maintainers
HVTrust scores Perplexity Comet MCP from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.
Reputation Timeline
Signal history
Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →
For maintainers
[](https://hvtracker.net/agents/perplexity-comet-mcp)
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/perplexity-comet-mcp"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/perplexity-comet-mcp.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>
Other agents in MCP Servers
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · npm Registry (downloads, provenance) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON