updated 2026-10-09 08:15 UTC

AutoGPT

Repository Website

AutoGPT is the vision of accessible AI for everyone, to use and to build on. Our mission is to provide the tools, so that you can focus on what matters.

Agent Frameworks Python Listed NOASSERTION

Is AutoGPT safe? Promising trust profile, but some evidence still deserves review.

OSSF Scorecard 6.0 / 10
Provenance None
Signed commits 99%
Last push today
Compare AutoGPT

How does it stack up against its Agent Frameworks neighbours?

Pick any agent to compare →
Suggest a correction

In detail: AutoGPT scores 65.9/100 (Grade B), ranked #452 of 1371 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage A (4 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 6.0/10; 99% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-10-09. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

How AutoGPT could raise its score

Each line changes one public signal and recomputes with the live scoring function. The gains don't add up exactly, because the score is capped near the top.

Already done? Suggest a correctionAdd the trust badge

Chain of custody

Scanners check what the code says. This traces who ships AutoGPT and whether that has changed: from the source repository, through how changes are reviewed and released, to the package you install. These are the checks for OWASP ASI04 Agentic Supply Chain Vulnerabilities.

  1. Source Signed

    github.com/Significant-Gravitas/AutoGPT, NOASSERTION, last pushed 2026-10-09. 99% of the last 100 commits carry a verified signature, so changes trace to a verified account.

  2. Review and release Mixed

    OpenSSF Scorecard rates the repository's practices 6.0/10 (scanned Oct 8, 2026). The checks that decide who can get a change released:

    • Code Review5
    • Branch Protection5
    • Signed Releases0
    • Dangerous Workflow10
    • Token Permissions0
    • Pinned Dependencies1
    All 18 Scorecard checks
    Binary-Artifacts 10
    Branch-Protection 5
    CI-Tests 10
    CII-Best-Practices 0
    Code-Review 5
    Contributors 10
    Dangerous-Workflow 10
    Dependency-Update-Tool 10
    Fuzzing 0
    License 9
    Maintained 10
    Packaging 10
    Pinned-Dependencies 1
    SAST 10
    Security-Policy 10
    Signed-Releases 0
    Token-Permissions 0
    Vulnerabilities 0

  3. Published packages Not linked

    • PyPI agpt Source link points to significant-gravitas/auto-gpt, same owner No build attestation

    Without a build attestation, nothing proves the published files were built from this repository.

Changes to this chain

  • 2026-08-07 Provenance drift warning cleared (now: unknown)

Evidence behind this score

Coverage A: 4 of 5 independent evidence types found.

  • GitHub repository data
  • Package downloads
  • Supply-chain checks
  • Public actions (missing)
  • Community mentions

Verify this score yourself

Every build re-issues AutoGPT’s score as an Ed25519-signed credential, valid for 7 days. You can check it offline against HVTracker’s published key; if anyone changes a number after signing, verification fails.

Signed credential (JSON) How to verify

What this score doesn’t check

It covers who ships the code, not what the code does. It doesn’t read tool descriptions or prompts for injected instructions, watch runtime behaviour, or find bugs nobody has disclosed yet. For that, run a content scanner before you connect it, such as Cisco MCP Scanner or Snyk Agent Scan.

How AutoGPT compares in Agent Frameworks

  1. #36 Google ADK (Python) 66.7 +0.8
  2. #37 Marvin 66.0 +0.1
  3. #38 AutoGPT 65.9 this agent
  4. #39 Semantic Kernel 65.7 −0.2
  5. #40 Mastra 65.6 −0.3

Bars show each HVTrust score; the tick marks AutoGPT’s 65.9.

Where the 65.9 comes from

HVTrust dimensions vs the Agent Frameworks average

65.9 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

AutoGPT Agent Frameworks average (129 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits
12.4 / 25
2.9 above avg 9.5
Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance
10.8 / 18
0.8 below avg 11.6
Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard
13.6 / 17
1.6 above avg 12.0
Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity
20.0 / 20
6.4 above avg 13.6
AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads
14.3 / 20
3.5 above avg 10.8

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It
Publish package provenance or release attestations for stronger supply-chain evidence.
Recent Changes
2026-10-06
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 12 spots (#439 → #451)
2026-10-02
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 11 spots (#427 → #438)
2026-09-30
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 13 spots (#412 → #425)
Maintainer Checklist
Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 6.0/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.
Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.
Compare with another agent Get email alerts for AutoGPT View Agent Frameworks Report missing data
100.0
Activity sub-score · out of 100
#38
In Agent Frameworks

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade B reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage A is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (4 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Signals refreshed 2026-10-09 08:15 UTC · Repo last pushed today

Rank Trend

2026-09-29 2026-10-09

Activity & Reach

Stars
187.5k
Forks
45.9k
Last Push
2026-10-09
today
Commits (4 wk)
512
Downloads (7d)
16
pypi
HN mentions (30d)
357
Open Issues
360
Rank Change
▲6
was #458

Analysis

Activity Inputs

100.0 / 100
StarsRepository reach
30 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
25.0 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
25 / 25
CommunityFork signal
20 / 20

Common questions about AutoGPT

AutoGPT has a mixed signal profile. Some trust indicators are present, others are missing. Whether it is safe for your use case depends on which gaps matter to you — review the breakdown below before adopting in production.
Does AutoGPT publish package provenance?
No published build provenance is currently detected for AutoGPT. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.
Does AutoGPT have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
AutoGPT has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 6.0/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.
Is AutoGPT actively maintained?
Actively maintained. The repository was pushed to within the last 1 day(s).
What license does AutoGPT use?
AutoGPT ships under NOASSERTION. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are AutoGPT's commits signed?
99% of the last 100 commits to AutoGPT are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface
Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support
medium confidence
Declared
MCP support appears present, but direct server implementation is less certain.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
External Service Dependencies
high confidence
12 detected
Public provider/service dependencies detected.
Credential signal: No explicit API-key/config marker detected.
Tool / Plugin Surface
high confidence
Marketplace
Marketplace plugin/integration surface detected.
  • browser
  • code
  • database
  • search
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
low confidence
Unknown
Package source metadata is missing or inconclusive
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
  • MCP signal live
  • External deps live
  • Tool / plugin surface live
  • Package provenance drift live
How this surface has changed

Detected changes to AutoGPT's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.

2026-09-03
Provider Removed
Runtime surface shrank — no longer detected: Multi-provider (LiteLLM)
2026-09-03
Provider Added
Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: Tavily
2026-08-07
Drift Warning Cleared
Provenance drift warning cleared (now: unknown)

Maintain AutoGPT?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores AutoGPT from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Submit a correction → Add the trust badge

Reputation Timeline

Signal history
Rank 27Drift 1HVTrust 1Grade 1Surface 1Surface 1
2026-10-06
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 12 spots (#439 → #451)
2026-10-02
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 11 spots (#427 → #438)
2026-09-30
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 13 spots (#412 → #425)
2026-09-24
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 10 spots (#406 → #416)
2026-09-23
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 247 spots (#159 → #406)
2026-09-21
Rank Moved
Rank rose 247 spots (#407 → #160)
2026-09-20
Rank Moved
Rank rose 25 spots (#432 → #407)
2026-09-11
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 14 spots (#411 → #425)
2026-09-07
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 23 spots (#381 → #404)
2026-09-05
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 77 spots (#299 → #376)
2026-09-04
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 11 spots (#288 → #299)
2026-09-03
Provider Removed
Runtime surface shrank — no longer detected: Multi-provider (LiteLLM)
2026-09-03
Provider Added
Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: Tavily
2026-09-03
Grade Changed
Trust grade C → B
2026-09-03
Rank Moved
Rank rose 80 spots (#368 → #288)
2026-09-03
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 3.7pts (62.4 → 66.1)
2026-09-01
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 11 spots (#350 → #361)
2026-08-31
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 37 spots (#313 → #350)
2026-08-30
Rank Moved
Rank rose 11 spots (#324 → #313)
2026-08-26
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 25 spots (#287 → #312)
2026-08-24
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 14 spots (#266 → #280)
2026-08-22
Rank Moved
Rank rose 14 spots (#284 → #270)
2026-08-19
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 14 spots (#271 → #285)
2026-08-17
Rank Moved
Rank rose 16 spots (#287 → #271)
2026-08-13
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 15 spots (#266 → #281)
2026-08-12
Rank Moved
Rank rose 15 spots (#281 → #266)
2026-08-10
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 17 spots (#265 → #282)
2026-08-08
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 61 spots (#201 → #262)
2026-08-07
Drift Warning Cleared
Provenance drift warning cleared (now: unknown)
2026-07-22
Rank Moved
Rank rose 35 spots (#257 → #222)
2026-07-14
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 15 spots (#232 → #247)
2026-07-13
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 29 spots (#203 → #232)
GitHub → Website → PyPI: agpt

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers
HVTrust 65.9 Grade B
Markdown:
[![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/autogpt.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/autogpt)
HTML:
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/autogpt"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/autogpt.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in Agent Frameworks

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · PyPI / pypistats (downloads, provenance) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI · Algolia HN Search API
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.4 · Raw JSON