Is Atomic Agents safe to use?

Atomic Agents has an HVTrust score of 56.6/100 (Grade C), ranked #390 of 1283 tracked AI agent projects. This score reflects verifiable supply-chain integrity, transparency, maintenance, and adoption signals.

What is the trust score for Atomic Agents?

Atomic Agents scores 56.6/100 on HVTracker's evidence-weighted HVTrust scale. It has 6.2k GitHub stars and is categorized under Agent Frameworks.

Atomic Agents

BrainBlend-AI/atomic-agents

Building AI agents, atomically

Agent Frameworks Python Grade C Listed MIT

56.6/100

Rank #390 of 1283

Compare Atomic Agents

How does it stack up against its Agent Frameworks neighbours?

Pick any agent to compare →

Promising trust profile, but some evidence still deserves review.

Open compare tool Suggest correction

Listing state

Listed

Evidence coverage

Grade A · 4/5 signals

Last push

2026-08-11 · 0d ago

Recent change

Rank +1

Is Atomic Agents safe? Atomic Agents scores 56.6/100 (Grade C), ranked #390 of 1283 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage A (4 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 4.8/10; 34% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-08-11. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

Ranked neighbours in Agent Frameworks

#55 IntentKit — 57.6 (C) → #56 Google AX — 57.2 (C) → #58 Verl Agent — 55.3 (C) → #59 Skales — 55.1 (C) →

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It

Publish package provenance or release attestations for stronger supply-chain evidence.

Recent Changes

2026-08-10

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 19 spots (#381 → #400)

2026-08-08

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 90 spots (#270 → #360)

2026-07-19

Tool Surface Changed

Detected tool/plugin surface changed: declared → marketplace

Maintainer Checklist

Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 4.8/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.

Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.

Increase signed commits Raise the share of verified-signed commits to make maintainer identity and release history easier to trust.

Compare with another agent Get email alerts for Atomic Agents View Agent Frameworks Report missing data

78.8

Activity sub-score · out of 100

#57

In Agent Frameworks

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade C reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage A is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (4 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Activity & Reach

Stars

6.2k

Forks

529

Last Push

2026-08-11

today

Commits (4 wk)

Downloads (7d)

3,792

pypi

HN mentions (30d)

Open Issues

Rank Change

▲10

was #400

Analysis

HVTrust Dimensions vs Agent Frameworks

56.6 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

Atomic Agents Agent Frameworks average (118 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits

7.7 / 25

in line with avg 8.1

Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance

10.8 / 18

0.8 below avg 11.6

Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard

12.6 / 17

1.0 above avg 11.6

Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity

17.9 / 20

3.5 above avg 14.4

AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads

13.9 / 20

2.5 above avg 11.4

Activity Inputs

78.8 / 100

StarsRepository reach

22.7 / 30

FreshnessLast push recency

25.0 / 25

ActivityRecent commits

18.4 / 25

CommunityFork signal

12.7 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance

None

No package attestations found

OSSF Scorecard

4.8 / 10

OpenSSF Scorecard · scanned Aug 10, 2026

Signed Commits

34%

of last 100 commits verified

Binary-Artifacts 10

Branch-Protection 5

CI-Tests 8

CII-Best-Practices 0

Code-Review 2

Contributors 10

Dangerous-Workflow 10

Dependency-Update-Tool 0

Fuzzing 0

License 10

Maintained 10

Packaging -1

Pinned-Dependencies 0

SAST 0

Security-Policy 0

Signed-Releases -1

Token-Permissions 10

Vulnerabilities 0

Is Atomic Agents safe?

Atomic Agents has a mixed signal profile. Some trust indicators are present, others are missing. Whether it is safe for your use case depends on which gaps matter to you — review the breakdown below before adopting in production.

Does Atomic Agents publish package provenance?

No published build provenance is currently detected for Atomic Agents. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.

Does Atomic Agents have an OpenSSF Scorecard?

Atomic Agents has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 4.8/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.

Is Atomic Agents actively maintained?

Actively maintained. The repository was pushed to within the last 1 day(s).

What license does Atomic Agents use?

Atomic Agents ships under MIT. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.

Are Atomic Agents's commits signed?

34% of the last 100 commits to Atomic Agents are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface

Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support

high confidence

Implemented

Atomic Agents appears to expose MCP server capabilities.

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

External Service Dependencies

high confidence

5 detected

Public provider/service dependencies detected.

Credential signal: No explicit API-key/config marker detected.

Tool / Plugin Surface

high confidence

Marketplace

Marketplace plugin/integration surface detected.

code

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

Package Provenance Drift

high confidence

Warning

1 package source mismatch detected

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

MCP signal live
External deps live
Tool / plugin surface live
Package provenance drift live

How this surface has changed

Detected changes to Atomic Agents's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.

2026-07-19

Tool Surface Changed

Detected tool/plugin surface changed: declared → marketplace

2026-07-19

Mcp Status Changed

Detected MCP server support changed: declared → implemented

2026-07-17

Provider Added

Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependencies: Google Gemini, Groq, Multi-provider (LiteLLM)

2026-06-16

Drift Warning Raised

Package-provenance drift warning: package metadata no longer clearly points at this repo

2026-06-15

Drift Warning Cleared

Provenance drift warning cleared (now: match)

2026-06-13

Drift Warning Raised

Package-provenance drift warning: package metadata no longer clearly points at this repo

2026-06-11

Drift Warning Cleared

Provenance drift warning cleared (now: match)

2026-06-10

Drift Warning Raised

Package-provenance drift warning: package metadata no longer clearly points at this repo

Maintain Atomic Agents?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores Atomic Agents from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Submit a correction → Add the trust badge

Reputation Timeline

Signal history

2026-08-10

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 19 spots (#381 → #400)

2026-08-08

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 90 spots (#270 → #360)

2026-07-19

Tool Surface Changed

Detected tool/plugin surface changed: declared → marketplace

2026-07-19

Mcp Status Changed

Detected MCP server support changed: declared → implemented

2026-07-19

Rank Moved

Rank rose 10 spots (#263 → #253)

2026-07-17

Provider Added

Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependencies: Google Gemini, Groq, Multi-provider (LiteLLM)

2026-07-17

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 11 spots (#255 → #266)

2026-07-15

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 28 spots (#227 → #255)

2026-07-13

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 15 spots (#204 → #219)

2026-06-24

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 11 spots (#143 → #154)

2026-06-19

Rank Moved

Rank rose 13 spots (#143 → #130)

2026-06-18

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 11 spots (#132 → #143)

2026-06-16

Drift Warning Raised

Package-provenance drift warning: package metadata no longer clearly points at this repo

2026-06-15

Drift Warning Cleared

Provenance drift warning cleared (now: match)

2026-06-13

Drift Warning Raised

Package-provenance drift warning: package metadata no longer clearly points at this repo

2026-06-11

Drift Warning Cleared

Provenance drift warning cleared (now: match)

2026-06-10

Drift Warning Raised

Package-provenance drift warning: package metadata no longer clearly points at this repo

2026-06-01

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 13 spots (#93 → #106)

2026-05-29

HVTrust Changed

HVTrust up 9.9pts (50.0 → 59.9)

2026-05-28

Activity Score Changed

Activity score up 13pts (60 → 73)

2026-05-27

Scorecard Added

OSSF Scorecard: 5.2/10

2026-05-27

Grade Changed

Trust grade C → B

2026-05-25

Newly Listed

First tracked at rank #109

GitHub → PyPI: atomic-agents

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers

Markdown:
            [![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/atomic-agents.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/atomic-agents)
            
HTML:
            <a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/atomic-agents"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/atomic-agents.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in Agent Frameworks

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · PyPI / pypistats (downloads, provenance) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI · Algolia HN Search API
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON