Astrid

Astrid is a portable, capability-secure operating system for composable software.

Agent Frameworks Rust Listed Apache-2.0

Is Astrid safe? Promising trust profile, but some evidence still deserves review.

OSSF Scorecard 7.5 / 10
Provenance None
Signed commits 100%
Last push 2d ago
Compare Astrid
Suggest a correction

In detail: Astrid scores 68.5/100 (Grade B), ranked #365 of 1325 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage C (2 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 7.5/10; 100% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-09-24. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

How Astrid compares in Agent Frameworks

  1. #25 Google ADK (Go) 69.0 +0.5
  2. #26 PraisonAI 68.6 +0.1
  3. #27 Astrid 68.5 this agent
  4. #28 Google ADK (Python) 67.5 −1.0
  5. #29 LangChain4j 67.2 −1.3

Bars show each HVTrust score; the tick marks Astrid’s 68.5.

Where the 68.5 comes from

HVTrust dimensions vs the Agent Frameworks average

68.5 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

Astrid Agent Frameworks average (122 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits
14.4 / 25
4.6 above avg 9.8
Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance
10.8 / 18
0.8 below avg 11.6
Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard
14.9 / 17
2.4 above avg 12.5
Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity
19.8 / 20
6.0 above avg 13.8
AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads
9.6 / 20
1.6 below avg 11.2

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It
Publish package provenance or release attestations for stronger supply-chain evidence.
Recent Changes
2026-09-23
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 228 spots (#136 → #364)
2026-09-21
Rank Moved
Rank rose 220 spots (#357 → #137)
2026-09-11
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 12 spots (#345 → #357)
Maintainer Checklist
Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.
83.9
Activity sub-score · out of 100
#27

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade B reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage C is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (2 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Signals refreshed 2026-09-26 10:08 UTC · Repo last pushed 2 days ago

Rank Trend

2026-08-11 2026-09-26

Activity & Reach

Stars
10.3k
Forks
139
Last Push
2026-09-24
2 days ago
Commits (4 wk)
98
Downloads (7d)
—
HN mentions (30d)
—
Open Issues
203
Rank Change
▼1
was #364

Analysis

Activity Inputs

83.9 / 100
StarsRepository reach
24.1 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
24.7 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
24.9 / 25
CommunityFork signal
10.0 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance
None
No package attestations found
OSSF Scorecard
7.5 / 10
OpenSSF Scorecard · scanned Sep 26, 2026
Signed Commits
100%
of last 100 commits verified
Dependency-Update-Tool 10
Code-Review 0
Dangerous-Workflow 10
Security-Policy 10
Maintained 10
Token-Permissions 10
Packaging -1
Binary-Artifacts 10
Pinned-Dependencies 10
CII-Best-Practices 0
Fuzzing 10
SAST 9
License 10
Signed-Releases 0
Branch-Protection 3
Vulnerabilities 7
Contributors 10
CI-Tests 10

Common questions about Astrid

Astrid has a mixed signal profile. Some trust indicators are present, others are missing. Whether it is safe for your use case depends on which gaps matter to you — review the breakdown below before adopting in production.
Does Astrid publish package provenance?
No published build provenance is currently detected for Astrid. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.
Does Astrid have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
Astrid has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 7.5/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.
Is Astrid actively maintained?
Actively maintained. The repository was pushed to within the last 2 day(s).
What license does Astrid use?
Astrid ships under Apache-2.0. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are Astrid's commits signed?
100% of the last 100 commits to Astrid are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface
Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support
medium confidence
Declared
MCP support appears present, but direct server implementation is less certain.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
External Service Dependencies
low confidence
None detected
No clear third-party provider dependency detected.
Credential signal: API keys or service config markers documented.
Tool / Plugin Surface
None detected
No clear plugin system or broad tool surface detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
N/A
No package source configured
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
  • MCP signal live
  • External deps live
  • Tool / plugin surface live
  • Package provenance drift live

Maintain Astrid?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores Astrid from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Reputation Timeline

Signal history
Rank 21
2026-09-23
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 228 spots (#136 → #364)
2026-09-21
Rank Moved
Rank rose 220 spots (#357 → #137)
2026-09-11
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 12 spots (#345 → #357)
2026-09-07
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 17 spots (#327 → #344)
2026-09-06
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 15 spots (#312 → #327)
2026-09-05
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 63 spots (#249 → #312)
2026-09-04
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 11 spots (#238 → #249)
2026-09-03
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 11 spots (#227 → #238)
2026-08-31
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 22 spots (#199 → #221)
2026-08-26
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 12 spots (#173 → #185)
2026-08-24
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 12 spots (#162 → #174)
2026-08-22
Rank Moved
Rank rose 11 spots (#175 → #164)
2026-08-18
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 17 spots (#151 → #168)
2026-08-17
Rank Moved
Rank rose 10 spots (#161 → #151)
2026-08-13
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 10 spots (#158 → #168)
2026-08-12
Rank Moved
Rank rose 11 spots (#169 → #158)
2026-08-10
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 10 spots (#153 → #163)
2026-08-08
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 17 spots (#134 → #151)
2026-07-18
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 16 spots (#103 → #119)
2026-07-13
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 11 spots (#82 → #93)
2026-07-10
Rank Moved
Rank rose 17 spots (#98 → #81)

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers
HVTrust 68.5 Grade B
Markdown:
[![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/astrid.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/astrid)
HTML:
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/astrid"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/astrid.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in Agent Frameworks

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON