aeon

The most autonomous AI agent framework: runs unattended on GitHub Actions, self-healing skills, drives Claude Code, Grok

Agent Frameworks Shell Grade C Listed MIT
62.6/100
Rank #525 of 1328
Compare aeon

How does it stack up against its Agent Frameworks neighbours?

Pick any agent to compare →

Promising trust profile, but some evidence still deserves review.

Open compare tool Suggest correction
Listing state
Listed
Evidence coverage
Grade C · 2/5 signals
Last push
2026-09-17 · 1d ago
Recent change
Rank +1

Is aeon safe? aeon scores 62.6/100 (Grade C), ranked #525 of 1328 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage C (2 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 6.1/10; 99% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-09-17. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

Ranked neighbours in Agent Frameworks

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It
Publish package provenance or release attestations for stronger supply-chain evidence.
Recent Changes
2026-09-12
Rank Moved
Rank rose 25 spots (#549 → #524)
2026-09-11
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 10 spots (#539 → #549)
2026-09-10
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 27 spots (#512 → #539)
Maintainer Checklist
Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 6.1/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.
Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.
78.5
Activity sub-score · out of 100
#44

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade C reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage C is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (2 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Signals refreshed 2026-09-18 13:03 UTC · Repo last pushed yesterday

Rank Trend

2026-08-11 2026-09-18

Activity & Reach

Stars
739
Forks
266
Last Push
2026-09-17
yesterday
Commits (4 wk)
163
Downloads (7d)
HN mentions (30d)
Open Issues
1
Rank Change
=
was #525

Analysis

HVTrust Dimensions vs Agent Frameworks

62.6 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

aeon Agent Frameworks average (122 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits
12.6 / 25
2.9 above avg 9.7
Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance
10.8 / 18
0.8 below avg 11.6
Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard
13.7 / 17
1.3 above avg 12.4
Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity
19.9 / 20
6.0 above avg 13.9
AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads
6.9 / 20
4.3 below avg 11.2

Activity Inputs

78.5 / 100
StarsRepository reach
17.2 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
24.9 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
25 / 25
CommunityFork signal
11.3 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance
None
No package attestations found
OSSF Scorecard
6.1 / 10
OpenSSF Scorecard · scanned Sep 12, 2026
Signed Commits
99%
of last 100 commits verified
Binary-Artifacts 10
Branch-Protection 0
CI-Tests 9
CII-Best-Practices 0
Code-Review 3
Contributors 10
Dangerous-Workflow 10
Dependency-Update-Tool 10
Fuzzing 0
License 10
Maintained 10
Packaging -1
Pinned-Dependencies 3
SAST 0
Security-Policy 10
Signed-Releases -1
Token-Permissions 0
Vulnerabilities 10

Is aeon safe?

aeon has a mixed signal profile. Some trust indicators are present, others are missing. Whether it is safe for your use case depends on which gaps matter to you — review the breakdown below before adopting in production.
Does aeon publish package provenance?
No published build provenance is currently detected for aeon. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.
Does aeon have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
aeon has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 6.1/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.
Is aeon actively maintained?
Actively maintained. The repository was pushed to within the last 1 day(s).
What license does aeon use?
aeon ships under MIT. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are aeon's commits signed?
99% of the last 100 commits to aeon are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface
Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support
medium confidence
Declared
MCP support appears present, but direct server implementation is less certain.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
External Service Dependencies
high confidence
1 detected
Public provider/service dependencies detected.
Credential signal: API keys or service config markers documented.
Tool / Plugin Surface
high confidence
Declared
Declared plugin/integration surface detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
N/A
No package source configured
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
  • MCP signal live
  • External deps live
  • Tool / plugin surface live
  • Package provenance drift live
How this surface has changed

Detected changes to aeon's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.

2026-08-26
Mcp Status Changed
Detected MCP server support changed: implemented → declared
2026-08-21
Provider Removed
Runtime surface shrank — no longer detected: xAI Grok
2026-08-17
Provider Added
Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: Anthropic
2026-08-06
Tool Surface Changed
Detected tool/plugin surface changed: marketplace → declared

Maintain aeon?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores aeon from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Reputation Timeline

Signal history
Rank 19Listed 1Surface 1Surface 1Surface 1MCP 1HVTrust 1Grade 1Scorecard 1
2026-09-12
Rank Moved
Rank rose 25 spots (#549 → #524)
2026-09-11
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 10 spots (#539 → #549)
2026-09-10
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 27 spots (#512 → #539)
2026-09-08
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 11 spots (#501 → #512)
2026-09-07
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 31 spots (#470 → #501)
2026-09-05
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 73 spots (#394 → #467)
2026-09-04
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 10 spots (#384 → #394)
2026-09-03
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 17 spots (#367 → #384)
2026-09-02
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 12 spots (#355 → #367)
2026-09-01
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 11 spots (#344 → #355)
2026-08-31
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 27 spots (#317 → #344)
2026-08-30
Scorecard Added
OSSF Scorecard: 6.1/10
2026-08-30
Grade Changed
Trust grade D → C
2026-08-30
Rank Moved
Rank rose 750 spots (#1067 → #317)
2026-08-30
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 38.3pts (24.2 → 62.5)
2026-08-29
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 46 spots (#1021 → #1067)
2026-08-28
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 35 spots (#986 → #1021)
2026-08-27
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 23 spots (#963 → #986)
2026-08-26
Mcp Status Changed
Detected MCP server support changed: implemented → declared
2026-08-26
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 138 spots (#825 → #963)
2026-08-21
Provider Removed
Runtime surface shrank — no longer detected: xAI Grok
2026-08-17
Provider Added
Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: Anthropic
2026-08-16
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 15 spots (#812 → #827)
2026-08-10
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 44 spots (#764 → #808)
2026-08-08
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 326 spots (#433 → #759)
2026-08-06
Tool Surface Changed
Detected tool/plugin surface changed: marketplace → declared
2026-08-03
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #426

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers
HVTrust 62.6 Grade C
Markdown:
[![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/aeon.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/aeon)
HTML:
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/aeon"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/aeon.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in Agent Frameworks

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON