Is AgentScope safe to use?

AgentScope has an HVTrust score of 69.9/100 (Grade B), ranked #136 of 1308 tracked AI agent projects. This score reflects verifiable supply-chain integrity, transparency, maintenance, and adoption signals.

What is the trust score for AgentScope?

AgentScope scores 69.9/100 on HVTracker's evidence-weighted HVTrust scale. It has 29.5k GitHub stars and is categorized under Agent Frameworks.

AgentScope

agentscope-ai/agentscope

Build and run agents you can see, understand and trust.

Agent Frameworks Python Grade B Listed Apache-2.0

69.9/100

Rank #136 of 1308

Compare AgentScope

How does it stack up against its Agent Frameworks neighbours?

Pick any agent to compare →

Promising trust profile, but some evidence still deserves review.

Open compare tool Suggest correction

Listing state

Listed

Evidence coverage

Grade B · 3/5 signals

Last push

2026-08-25 · 0d ago

Recent change

Rank +1

Is AgentScope safe? AgentScope scores 69.9/100 (Grade B), ranked #136 of 1308 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage B (3 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 4.3/10; 100% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-08-25. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

Ranked neighbours in Agent Frameworks

#19 Claude Agent SDK — 72.1 (B) → #20 Zeroclaw — 70.4 (B) → #22 PraisonAI — 69.2 (B) → #23 Google ADK (Go) — 69.1 (B) →

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It

Publish package provenance or release attestations for stronger supply-chain evidence.

Recent Changes

2026-08-25

Rank Moved

Rank rose 10 spots (#146 → #136)

2026-08-24

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 10 spots (#136 → #146)

2026-08-17

Rank Moved

Rank rose 10 spots (#147 → #137)

Maintainer Checklist

Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 4.3/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.

Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.

Compare with another agent Get email alerts for AgentScope View Agent Frameworks Report missing data

91.7

Activity sub-score · out of 100

#21

In Agent Frameworks

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade B reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage B is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (3 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Rank Trend

2026-08-11 2026-08-25

Activity & Reach

Stars

29.5k

Forks

3.4k

Last Push

2026-08-25

today

Commits (4 wk)

Downloads (7d)

82,931

pypi

HN mentions (30d)

—

Open Issues

242

Rank Change

▲10

was #146

Analysis

HVTrust Dimensions vs Agent Frameworks

69.9 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

AgentScope Agent Frameworks average (119 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits

10.4 / 25

2.3 above avg 8.1

Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance

10.8 / 18

0.8 below avg 11.6

Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard

12.2 / 17

0.7 above avg 11.5

Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity

19.5 / 20

5.3 above avg 14.2

AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads

17.3 / 20

6.0 above avg 11.3

Activity Inputs

91.7 / 100

StarsRepository reach

26.8 / 30

FreshnessLast push recency

25.0 / 25

ActivityRecent commits

23.5 / 25

CommunityFork signal

16.4 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance

None

No package attestations found

OSSF Scorecard

4.3 / 10

OpenSSF Scorecard · scanned Aug 25, 2026

Signed Commits

100%

of last 100 commits verified

Binary-Artifacts 10

Branch-Protection 1

CI-Tests 10

CII-Best-Practices 0

Code-Review 5

Contributors 10

Dangerous-Workflow 10

Dependency-Update-Tool 0

Fuzzing 0

License 10

Maintained 10

Packaging 10

Pinned-Dependencies 0

SAST 0

Security-Policy 0

Signed-Releases -1

Token-Permissions 0

Vulnerabilities 0

Is AgentScope safe?

AgentScope has a mixed signal profile. Some trust indicators are present, others are missing. Whether it is safe for your use case depends on which gaps matter to you — review the breakdown below before adopting in production.

Does AgentScope publish package provenance?

No published build provenance is currently detected for AgentScope. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.

Does AgentScope have an OpenSSF Scorecard?

AgentScope has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 4.3/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.

Is AgentScope actively maintained?

Actively maintained. The repository was pushed to within the last 1 day(s).

What license does AgentScope use?

AgentScope ships under Apache-2.0. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.

Are AgentScope's commits signed?

100% of the last 100 commits to AgentScope are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface

Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support

None detected

No MCP server signal detected.

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

External Service Dependencies

high confidence

8 detected

Public provider/service dependencies detected.

Credential signal: API keys or service config markers documented.

Tool / Plugin Surface

medium confidence

1 tags

Broad capability areas detected.

database

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

Package Provenance Drift

high confidence

Match

Published package metadata matches the tracked repo

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

MCP signal live
External deps live
Tool / plugin surface live
Package provenance drift live

How this surface has changed

Detected changes to AgentScope's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.

2026-08-12

Provider Removed

Runtime surface shrank — no longer detected: Postgres

2026-07-20

Provider Added

Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: Postgres

2026-07-17

Provider Added

Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependencies: Google Gemini, xAI Grok

2026-06-27

Provider Added

Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependencies: Amazon Bedrock, Qdrant

2026-06-06

Tool Surface Changed

Detected tool/plugin surface changed: declared → none

Maintain AgentScope?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores AgentScope from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Submit a correction → Add the trust badge

Reputation Timeline

Signal history

2026-08-25

Rank Moved

Rank rose 10 spots (#146 → #136)

2026-08-24

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 10 spots (#136 → #146)

2026-08-17

Rank Moved

Rank rose 10 spots (#147 → #137)

2026-08-13

Grade Changed

Trust grade C → B

2026-08-13

Rank Moved

Rank rose 75 spots (#218 → #143)

2026-08-13

HVTrust Changed

HVTrust up 5.0pts (64.8 → 69.8)

2026-08-12

Provider Removed

Runtime surface shrank — no longer detected: Postgres

2026-08-12

Grade Changed

Trust grade B → C

2026-08-12

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 74 spots (#144 → #218)

2026-08-12

HVTrust Changed

HVTrust down 4.8pts (69.6 → 64.8)

2026-08-10

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 10 spots (#135 → #145)

2026-08-08

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 11 spots (#121 → #132)

2026-07-20

Provider Added

Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: Postgres

2026-07-17

Provider Added

Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependencies: Google Gemini, xAI Grok

2026-07-13

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 11 spots (#86 → #97)

2026-06-27

Provider Added

Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependencies: Amazon Bedrock, Qdrant

2026-06-06

Tool Surface Changed

Detected tool/plugin surface changed: declared → none

2026-05-29

HVTrust Changed

HVTrust up 9.9pts (57.3 → 67.2)

2026-05-28

Activity Score Changed

Activity score up 20pts (67 → 87)

GitHub → PyPI: agentscope

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers

Markdown:
            [![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/agentscope.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/agentscope)
            
HTML:
            <a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/agentscope"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/agentscope.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in Agent Frameworks

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · PyPI / pypistats (downloads, provenance) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON