Zeroclaw

Fast, small, and fully autonomous AI personal assistant infrastructure, any OS, any platform — deploy anywhere, swap anything 🦀

Agent Frameworks Rust Listed Apache-2.0

Is Zeroclaw safe? Promising trust profile, but some evidence still deserves review.

OSSF Scorecard 7.4 / 10
Provenance None
Signed commits 100%
Last push today
Compare Zeroclaw
Suggest a correction

In detail: Zeroclaw scores 70.4/100 (Grade B), ranked #326 of 1325 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage C (2 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 7.4/10; 100% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-09-26. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

How Zeroclaw compares in Agent Frameworks

  1. #20 BeeAI Framework 71.3 +0.9
  2. #21 AutoGen 70.5 +0.1
  3. #22 Zeroclaw 70.4 this agent
  4. #23 AgentScope 70.3 −0.1
  5. #24 Google ADK (Go) 69.0 −1.4

Bars show each HVTrust score; the tick marks Zeroclaw’s 70.4.

Where the 70.4 comes from

HVTrust dimensions vs the Agent Frameworks average

70.4 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

Zeroclaw Agent Frameworks average (122 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits
14.3 / 25
4.5 above avg 9.8
Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance
10.8 / 18
0.8 below avg 11.6
Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard
14.8 / 17
2.3 above avg 12.5
Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity
20.0 / 20
6.2 above avg 13.8
AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads
10.8 / 20
in line with avg 11.2

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It
Publish package provenance or release attestations for stronger supply-chain evidence.
Recent Changes
2026-09-23
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 199 spots (#120 → #319)
2026-09-21
Rank Moved
Rank rose 196 spots (#316 → #120)
2026-09-07
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 17 spots (#288 → #305)
Maintainer Checklist
Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.
94.3
Activity sub-score · out of 100
#22

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade B reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage C is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (2 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Signals refreshed 2026-09-26 12:32 UTC · Repo last pushed today

Rank Trend

2026-08-11 2026-09-26

Activity & Reach

Stars
32.9k
Forks
5.0k
Last Push
2026-09-26
today
Commits (4 wk)
438
Downloads (7d)
—
HN mentions (30d)
—
Open Issues
544
Rank Change
=
was #326

Analysis

Activity Inputs

94.3 / 100
StarsRepository reach
27.1 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
25.0 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
25 / 25
CommunityFork signal
17.2 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance
None
No package attestations found
OSSF Scorecard
7.4 / 10
OpenSSF Scorecard · scanned Sep 14, 2026
Signed Commits
100%
of last 100 commits verified
Binary-Artifacts 10
Branch-Protection 8
CI-Tests 10
CII-Best-Practices 0
Code-Review 10
Contributors 10
Dangerous-Workflow 10
Dependency-Update-Tool 10
Fuzzing 10
License 10
Maintained 10
Packaging 10
Pinned-Dependencies 9
SAST 9
Security-Policy 10
Signed-Releases 0
Token-Permissions 0
Vulnerabilities 0

Common questions about Zeroclaw

Zeroclaw has a mixed signal profile. Some trust indicators are present, others are missing. Whether it is safe for your use case depends on which gaps matter to you — review the breakdown below before adopting in production.
Does Zeroclaw publish package provenance?
No published build provenance is currently detected for Zeroclaw. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.
Does Zeroclaw have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
Zeroclaw has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 7.4/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.
Is Zeroclaw actively maintained?
Actively maintained. The repository was pushed to within the last 1 day(s).
What license does Zeroclaw use?
Zeroclaw ships under Apache-2.0. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are Zeroclaw's commits signed?
100% of the last 100 commits to Zeroclaw are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface
Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support
medium confidence
Declared
MCP support appears present, but direct server implementation is less certain.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
External Service Dependencies
None detected
No clear third-party provider dependency detected.
Credential signal: No explicit API-key/config marker detected.
Tool / Plugin Surface
high confidence
Declared
Declared plugin/integration surface detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
N/A
No package source configured
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
  • MCP signal live
  • External deps live
  • Tool / plugin surface live
  • Package provenance drift live
How this surface has changed

Detected changes to Zeroclaw's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.

2026-09-03
Mcp Status Changed
Detected MCP server support changed: none → declared

Maintain Zeroclaw?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores Zeroclaw from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Reputation Timeline

Signal history
Rank 13MCP 1
2026-09-23
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 199 spots (#120 → #319)
2026-09-21
Rank Moved
Rank rose 196 spots (#316 → #120)
2026-09-07
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 17 spots (#288 → #305)
2026-09-05
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 57 spots (#224 → #281)
2026-09-04
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 14 spots (#210 → #224)
2026-09-03
Mcp Status Changed
Detected MCP server support changed: none → declared
2026-08-31
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 23 spots (#174 → #197)
2026-08-29
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 10 spots (#168 → #178)
2026-08-26
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 16 spots (#142 → #158)
2026-08-22
Rank Moved
Rank rose 11 spots (#146 → #135)
2026-08-17
Rank Moved
Rank rose 12 spots (#148 → #136)
2026-08-13
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 10 spots (#130 → #140)
2026-08-08
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 13 spots (#116 → #129)
2026-07-13
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 14 spots (#90 → #104)

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers
HVTrust 70.4 Grade B
Markdown:
[![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/zeroclaw.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/zeroclaw)
HTML:
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/zeroclaw"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/zeroclaw.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in Agent Frameworks

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON