AgenticSeek
Fully Local Manus AI. No APIs, No $200 monthly bills. Enjoy an autonomous agent that thinks, browses the web, and code for the sole cost of electricity.
Is AgenticSeek safe? Thin or incomplete trust evidence. Review carefully before production use.
Compare AgenticSeek
How does it stack up against its Agent Frameworks neighbours?
Pick any agent to compare →In detail: AgenticSeek scores 52.7/100 (Grade C), ranked #861 of 1325 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage C (2 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 3.9/10; 39% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-09-25. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →
How AgenticSeek compares in Agent Frameworks
- #75 IntentKit 53.4 +0.7
- #76 Agently 52.7 ±0
- #77 AgenticSeek 52.7 this agent
- #78 ouroboros 52.1 −0.6
- #79 chidori 51.9 −0.8
Bars show each HVTrust score; the tick marks AgenticSeek’s 52.7.
Where the 52.7 comes from
HVTrust dimensions vs the Agent Frameworks average
52.7 / 100 · 100.0% confidenceAgenticSeek Agent Frameworks average (122 agents)
Quick Trust Read
How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade C reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage C is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (2 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →
Rank Trend
Activity & Reach
Analysis
Activity Inputs
83.7 / 100Supply Chain Trust
Common questions about AgenticSeek
Does AgenticSeek publish package provenance?
Does AgenticSeek have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
Is AgenticSeek actively maintained?
What license does AgenticSeek use?
Are AgenticSeek's commits signed?
Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.
AI agent surface
MCP, providers, tool surface
These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →
- browser
- MCP signal live
- External deps live
- Tool / plugin surface live
- Package provenance drift live
Maintain AgenticSeek?
For maintainers
HVTrust scores AgenticSeek from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.
Reputation Timeline
Signal history
Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →
For maintainers
[](https://hvtracker.net/agents/agenticseek)
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/agenticseek"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/agenticseek.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>
Other agents in Agent Frameworks
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON