updated 2026-08-12 05:02 UTC

AgenticSeek

Fosowl/agenticSeek

Fully Local Manus AI. No APIs, No $200 monthly bills. Enjoy an autonomous agent that thinks, browses the web, and code f

Agent Frameworks Python Grade C Listed GPL-3.0
51.4/100
Rank #440 of 1283
Compare AgenticSeek

How does it stack up against its Agent Frameworks neighbours?

Pick any agent to compare →

Thin or incomplete trust evidence. Review carefully before production use.

Open compare tool Suggest correction
Listing state
Listed
Evidence coverage
Grade C · 2/5 signals
Last push
2026-08-11 · 1d ago
Recent change
Rank +1

Is AgenticSeek safe? AgenticSeek scores 51.4/100 (Grade C), ranked #440 of 1283 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage C (2 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 3.9/10; 43% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-08-11. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

Ranked neighbours in Agent Frameworks

#63 Agently — 52.8 (C) → #64 OpenEvolve — 52.6 (C) → #66 Mirascope — 51.2 (C) → #67 Qwen Agent — 49.8 (D) →

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It
Publish package provenance or release attestations for stronger supply-chain evidence.
Recent Changes
2026-08-10
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 15 spots (#430 → #445)
2026-08-08
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 107 spots (#320 → #427)
2026-07-15
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 18 spots (#266 → #284)
Maintainer Checklist
Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 3.9/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.
Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.
Increase signed commits Raise the share of verified-signed commits to make maintainer identity and release history easier to trust.
Compare with another agent Get email alerts for AgenticSeek View Agent Frameworks Report missing data
79.1
Activity sub-score · out of 100
#65
In Agent Frameworks

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade C reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage C is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (2 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Signals refreshed 2026-08-12 05:02 UTC · Repo last pushed yesterday

Rank Trend

2026-08-11 2026-08-12

Activity & Reach

Stars
26.8k
Forks
3.0k
Last Push
2026-08-11
yesterday
Commits (4 wk)
7
Downloads (7d)
—
HN mentions (30d)
—
Open Issues
27
Rank Change
▼1
was #439

Analysis

HVTrust Dimensions vs Agent Frameworks

51.4 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

AgenticSeek Agent Frameworks average (118 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits
7.0 / 25
1.1 below avg 8.1
Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance
10.8 / 18
0.8 below avg 11.6
Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard
11.8 / 17
in line with avg 11.5
Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity
15.5 / 20
1.2 above avg 14.3
AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads
10.6 / 20
0.8 below avg 11.4

Activity Inputs

79.1 / 100
StarsRepository reach
26.6 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
24.9 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
11.3 / 25
CommunityFork signal
16.2 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance
None
No package attestations found
OSSF Scorecard
3.9 / 10
OpenSSF Scorecard · scanned Aug 11, 2026
Signed Commits
43%
of last 100 commits verified
Binary-Artifacts 9
Branch-Protection 1
CI-Tests 0
CII-Best-Practices 0
Code-Review 6
Contributors 10
Dangerous-Workflow -1
Dependency-Update-Tool 0
Fuzzing 0
License 10
Maintained 10
Packaging -1
Pinned-Dependencies 0
SAST 0
Security-Policy 10
Signed-Releases -1
Token-Permissions -1
Vulnerabilities 0

Is AgenticSeek safe?

Public trust evidence for AgenticSeek is thin: several supply-chain signals are missing or weak. This does not mean the project is unsafe — it means an outside observer cannot easily verify the usual integrity checks. Treat with extra scrutiny.
Does AgenticSeek publish package provenance?
No published build provenance is currently detected for AgenticSeek. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.
Does AgenticSeek have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
AgenticSeek has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 3.9/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.
Is AgenticSeek actively maintained?
Actively maintained. The repository was pushed to within the last 1 day(s).
What license does AgenticSeek use?
AgenticSeek ships under GPL-3.0. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are AgenticSeek's commits signed?
43% of the last 100 commits to AgenticSeek are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface
Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support
None detected
No MCP server signal detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
External Service Dependencies
high confidence
7 detected
Public provider/service dependencies detected.
Credential signal: API keys or service config markers documented.
Tool / Plugin Surface
high confidence
1 tags
Broad capability areas detected.
  • browser
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
N/A
No package source configured
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
  • MCP signal live
  • External deps live
  • Tool / plugin surface live
  • Package provenance drift live

Maintain AgenticSeek?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores AgenticSeek from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Submit a correction → Add the trust badge

Reputation Timeline

Signal history
Rank 6Listed 1Score 1
2026-08-10
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 15 spots (#430 → #445)
2026-08-08
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 107 spots (#320 → #427)
2026-07-15
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 18 spots (#266 → #284)
2026-07-14
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 13 spots (#253 → #266)
2026-07-13
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 29 spots (#224 → #253)
2026-07-02
Rank Moved
Rank rose 19 spots (#218 → #199)
2026-07-02
Activity Score Changed
Activity score up 7pts (74 → 81)
2026-06-24
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #206
GitHub →

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers
HVTrust 51.4 Grade C
Markdown:
[![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/agenticseek.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/agenticseek)
HTML:
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/agenticseek"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/agenticseek.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in Agent Frameworks

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON