Is AgenticSeek safe to use?

AgenticSeek has an HVTrust score of 50.9/100 (Grade C), ranked #430 of 1204 tracked AI agent projects. This score reflects verifiable supply-chain integrity, transparency, maintenance, and adoption signals.

What is the trust score for AgenticSeek?

AgenticSeek scores 50.9/100 on HVTracker's evidence-weighted HVTrust scale. It has 26.8k GitHub stars and is categorized under Agent Frameworks.

AgenticSeek

Fosowl/agenticSeek

Fully Local Manus AI. No APIs, No $200 monthly bills. Enjoy an autonomous agent that thinks, browses the web, and code f

Agent Frameworks Python Grade C Listed GPL-3.0

50.9/100

Rank #430 of 1204

Compare AgenticSeek

How does it stack up against its Agent Frameworks neighbours?

Pick any agent to compare →

Thin or incomplete trust evidence. Review carefully before production use.

Open compare tool Suggest correction

Listing state

Listed

Evidence coverage

Grade C · 2/5 signals

Last push

2026-08-03 · 6d ago

Recent change

Rank +3

Is AgenticSeek safe? AgenticSeek scores 50.9/100 (Grade C), ranked #430 of 1204 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage C (2 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 3.9/10; 43% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-08-03. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

Ranked neighbours in Agent Frameworks

#64 Agently — 53.0 (C) → #65 OpenFang — 51.1 (C) → #67 Mirascope — 50.6 (C) → #68 Qwen Agent — 50.0 (C) →

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It

Publish package provenance or release attestations for stronger supply-chain evidence.

Recent Changes

2026-08-08

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 107 spots (#320 → #427)

2026-08-07

Tool Surface Changed

Detected tool/plugin surface changed: extension-based → none

2026-08-07

Provider Removed

Runtime surface shrank — no longer detected: Redis, SerpAPI

Maintainer Checklist

Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 3.9/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.

Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.

Increase signed commits Raise the share of verified-signed commits to make maintainer identity and release history easier to trust.

Compare with another agent Get email alerts for AgenticSeek View Agent Frameworks Report missing data

77.6

Activity sub-score · out of 100

#66

In Agent Frameworks

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade C reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage C is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (2 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Activity & Reach

Stars

26.8k

Forks

3.0k

Last Push

2026-08-03

6 days ago

Commits (4 wk)

Downloads (7d)

—

HN mentions (30d)

—

Open Issues

Rank Change

▼3

was #427

Analysis

HVTrust Dimensions vs Agent Frameworks

50.9 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

AgenticSeek Agent Frameworks average (117 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits

7.0 / 25

1.2 below avg 8.2

Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance

10.8 / 18

0.8 below avg 11.6

Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard

11.8 / 17

in line with avg 11.6

Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity

15.0 / 20

0.7 above avg 14.3

AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads

10.6 / 20

0.8 below avg 11.4

Activity Inputs

77.6 / 100

StarsRepository reach

26.6 / 30

FreshnessLast push recency

24.2 / 25

ActivityRecent commits

10.5 / 25

CommunityFork signal

16.2 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance

None

No package attestations found

OSSF Scorecard

3.9 / 10

OpenSSF Scorecard · scanned Aug 9, 2026

Signed Commits

43%

of last 100 commits verified

Binary-Artifacts 9

Branch-Protection 1

CI-Tests 0

CII-Best-Practices 0

Code-Review 6

Contributors 10

Dangerous-Workflow -1

Dependency-Update-Tool 0

Fuzzing 0

License 10

Maintained 10

Packaging -1

Pinned-Dependencies 0

SAST 0

Security-Policy 10

Signed-Releases -1

Token-Permissions -1

Vulnerabilities 0

Is AgenticSeek safe?

Public trust evidence for AgenticSeek is thin: several supply-chain signals are missing or weak. This does not mean the project is unsafe — it means an outside observer cannot easily verify the usual integrity checks. Treat with extra scrutiny.

Does AgenticSeek publish package provenance?

No published build provenance is currently detected for AgenticSeek. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.

Does AgenticSeek have an OpenSSF Scorecard?

AgenticSeek has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 3.9/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.

Is AgenticSeek actively maintained?

Actively maintained. The repository was pushed to within the last 6 day(s).

What license does AgenticSeek use?

AgenticSeek ships under GPL-3.0. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.

Are AgenticSeek's commits signed?

43% of the last 100 commits to AgenticSeek are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface

Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support

None detected

No MCP server signal detected.

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

External Service Dependencies

high confidence

7 detected

Public provider/service dependencies detected.

Credential signal: API keys or service config markers documented.

Tool / Plugin Surface

high confidence

1 tags

Broad capability areas detected.

browser

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

Package Provenance Drift

N/A

No package source configured

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

MCP signal live
External deps live
Tool / plugin surface live
Package provenance drift live

How this surface has changed

Detected changes to AgenticSeek's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.

2026-08-07

Tool Surface Changed

Detected tool/plugin surface changed: extension-based → none

2026-08-07

Provider Removed

Runtime surface shrank — no longer detected: Redis, SerpAPI

2026-08-07

Provider Added

Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependencies: DeepSeek, Multi-provider (LiteLLM), OpenRouter, Together AI

Maintain AgenticSeek?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores AgenticSeek from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Submit a correction → Add the trust badge

Reputation Timeline

Signal history

2026-08-08

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 107 spots (#320 → #427)

2026-08-07

Tool Surface Changed

Detected tool/plugin surface changed: extension-based → none

2026-08-07

Provider Removed

Runtime surface shrank — no longer detected: Redis, SerpAPI

2026-08-07

Provider Added

Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependencies: DeepSeek, Multi-provider (LiteLLM), OpenRouter, Together AI

2026-07-15

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 18 spots (#266 → #284)

2026-07-14

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 13 spots (#253 → #266)

2026-07-13

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 29 spots (#224 → #253)

2026-07-02

Rank Moved

Rank rose 19 spots (#218 → #199)

2026-07-02

Activity Score Changed

Activity score up 7pts (74 → 81)

2026-06-24

Newly Listed

First tracked at rank #206

GitHub →

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers

Markdown:
            [![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/agenticseek.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/agenticseek)
            
HTML:
            <a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/agenticseek"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/agenticseek.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in Agent Frameworks

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.2 · Raw JSON