Is EnterpriseAgentFramework safe to use?

EnterpriseAgentFramework has an HVTrust score of 44.7/100 (Grade D), ranked #1056 of 1328 tracked AI agent projects. This score reflects verifiable supply-chain integrity, transparency, maintenance, and adoption signals.

What is the trust score for EnterpriseAgentFramework?

EnterpriseAgentFramework scores 44.7/100 on HVTracker's evidence-weighted HVTrust scale. It has 744 GitHub stars and is categorized under Agent Frameworks.

EnterpriseAgentFramework

w8123/EnterpriseAgentFramework

ReachAI企业级智能体开发平台：快速、安全完成已有业务系统智能化改造，让 AI 在 OA、ERP、CRM 等原系统中查数据、填表单、办业务。ReachAI: Quickly and securely bring AI to existi

Agent Frameworks Java Grade D Listed MIT

44.7/100

Rank #1056 of 1328

Compare EnterpriseAgentFramework

How does it stack up against its Agent Frameworks neighbours?

Pick any agent to compare →

Thin or incomplete trust evidence. Review carefully before production use.

Open compare tool Suggest correction

Listing state

Listed

Evidence coverage

Grade C · 2/5 signals

Last push

2026-09-12 · 6d ago

Recent change

Rank +1

Is EnterpriseAgentFramework safe? EnterpriseAgentFramework scores 44.7/100 (Grade D), ranked #1056 of 1328 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage C (2 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 2.6/10; 1% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-09-12. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

Ranked neighbours in Agent Frameworks

#91 agentUniverse — 46.0 (D) → #92 nuwax — 45.3 (D) → #94 ControlFlow — 44.6 (D) → #95 agentos — 44.6 (D) →

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It

Publish package provenance or release attestations for stronger supply-chain evidence.

Recent Changes

2026-09-15

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 11 spots (#1049 → #1060)

2026-09-12

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 18 spots (#1028 → #1046)

2026-09-09

Rank Moved

Rank rose 14 spots (#1034 → #1020)

Maintainer Checklist

Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 2.6/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.

Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.

Increase signed commits Raise the share of verified-signed commits to make maintainer identity and release history easier to trust.

Compare with another agent Get email alerts for EnterpriseAgentFramework View Agent Frameworks Report missing data

58.6

Activity sub-score · out of 100

#93

In Agent Frameworks

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade D reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage C is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (2 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Rank Trend

2026-08-11 2026-09-18

Activity & Reach

Stars

744

Forks

Last Push

2026-09-12

6 days ago

Commits (4 wk)

Downloads (7d)

—

HN mentions (30d)

—

Open Issues

Rank Change

was #1056

Analysis

HVTrust Dimensions vs Agent Frameworks

44.7 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

EnterpriseAgentFramework Agent Frameworks average (122 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits

3.3 / 25

6.4 below avg 9.7

Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance

10.8 / 18

0.8 below avg 11.6

Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard

10.7 / 17

1.7 below avg 12.4

Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity

13.0 / 20

0.9 below avg 13.9

AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads

6.9 / 20

4.3 below avg 11.2

Activity Inputs

58.6 / 100

StarsRepository reach

17.2 / 30

FreshnessLast push recency

24.2 / 25

ActivityRecent commits

8.7 / 25

CommunityFork signal

8.4 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance

None

No package attestations found

OSSF Scorecard

2.6 / 10

OpenSSF Scorecard · scanned Sep 17, 2026

Signed Commits

of last 100 commits verified

Binary-Artifacts 10

Branch-Protection 0

CI-Tests -1

CII-Best-Practices 0

Code-Review 0

Contributors 0

Dangerous-Workflow -1

Dependency-Update-Tool 0

Fuzzing 0

License 10

Maintained 10

Packaging -1

Pinned-Dependencies 2

SAST 0

Security-Policy 0

Signed-Releases -1

Token-Permissions -1

Vulnerabilities 0

Is EnterpriseAgentFramework safe?

Public trust evidence for EnterpriseAgentFramework is thin: several supply-chain signals are missing or weak. This does not mean the project is unsafe — it means an outside observer cannot easily verify the usual integrity checks. Treat with extra scrutiny.

Does EnterpriseAgentFramework publish package provenance?

No published build provenance is currently detected for EnterpriseAgentFramework. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.

Does EnterpriseAgentFramework have an OpenSSF Scorecard?

EnterpriseAgentFramework has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 2.6/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.

Is EnterpriseAgentFramework actively maintained?

Actively maintained. The repository was pushed to within the last 6 day(s).

What license does EnterpriseAgentFramework use?

EnterpriseAgentFramework ships under MIT. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.

Are EnterpriseAgentFramework's commits signed?

1% of the last 100 commits to EnterpriseAgentFramework are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface

Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support

None detected

No MCP server signal detected.

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

External Service Dependencies

None detected

No clear third-party provider dependency detected.

Credential signal: No explicit API-key/config marker detected.

Tool / Plugin Surface

None detected

No clear plugin system or broad tool surface detected.

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

Package Provenance Drift

N/A

No package source configured

Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.

MCP signal live
External deps live
Tool / plugin surface live
Package provenance drift live

Maintain EnterpriseAgentFramework?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores EnterpriseAgentFramework from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Submit a correction → Add the trust badge

Reputation Timeline

Signal history

2026-09-15

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 11 spots (#1049 → #1060)

2026-09-12

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 18 spots (#1028 → #1046)

2026-09-09

Rank Moved

Rank rose 14 spots (#1034 → #1020)

2026-09-08

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 12 spots (#1022 → #1034)

2026-09-07

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 30 spots (#992 → #1022)

2026-09-06

Scorecard Added

OSSF Scorecard: 2.6/10

2026-09-06

Rank Moved

Rank rose 313 spots (#1305 → #992)

2026-09-06

HVTrust Changed

HVTrust up 25.0pts (19.6 → 44.6)

2026-09-03

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 24 spots (#1265 → #1289)

2026-09-02

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 25 spots (#1240 → #1265)

2026-09-01

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 19 spots (#1221 → #1240)

2026-08-30

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 24 spots (#1188 → #1212)

2026-08-29

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 22 spots (#1166 → #1188)

2026-08-28

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 21 spots (#1145 → #1166)

2026-08-27

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 11 spots (#1134 → #1145)

2026-08-26

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 68 spots (#1066 → #1134)

2026-08-23

Rank Moved

Rank rose 25 spots (#1088 → #1063)

2026-08-20

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 29 spots (#1065 → #1094)

2026-08-19

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 15 spots (#1050 → #1065)

2026-08-16

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 20 spots (#1035 → #1055)

2026-08-13

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 17 spots (#1025 → #1042)

2026-08-12

Rank Moved

Rank rose 17 spots (#1042 → #1025)

2026-08-10

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 63 spots (#974 → #1037)

2026-08-08

Rank Moved

Rank dropped 477 spots (#483 → #960)

2026-08-03

Newly Listed

First tracked at rank #450

GitHub →

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers

Markdown:
            [![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/enterpriseagentframework.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/enterpriseagentframework)
            
HTML:
            <a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/enterpriseagentframework"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/enterpriseagentframework.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in Agent Frameworks

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON