EnterpriseAgentFramework
ReachAI企业级智能体开发平台:快速、安全完成已有业务系统智能化改造,让 AI 在 OA、ERP、CRM 等原系统中查数据、填表单、办业务。ReachAI: Quickly and securely bring AI to existing enterprise systems, enabling AI to query data, fill out forms, and execute business tasks directly within OA, ERP, CRM, and other business applications.
Is EnterpriseAgentFramework safe? Thin or incomplete trust evidence. Review carefully before production use.
Compare EnterpriseAgentFramework
How does it stack up against its Agent Frameworks neighbours?
Pick any agent to compare →In detail: EnterpriseAgentFramework scores 49.0/100 (Grade D), ranked #1042 of 1374 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage C (2 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 2.6/10; 1% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-11-02. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →
How EnterpriseAgentFramework could raise its score
Each line changes one public signal and recomputes with the live scoring function. The gains don't add up exactly, because the score is capped near the top.
- Raise the OSSF Scorecard from 2.6 to 9.0lowest checks: Branch-Protection 0, CII-Best-Practices 0, Code-Review 0 +13.4 → 62.4 C · #59 of 130
- Sign every commit1% signed today +4.9 → 53.9 C · #86 of 130
Chain of custody
Scanners check what the code says. This traces who ships EnterpriseAgentFramework and whether that has changed: from the source repository, through how changes are reviewed and released, to the code you run. These are the checks for OWASP ASI04 Agentic Supply Chain Vulnerabilities.
-
Source Partly signed
github.com/w8123/EnterpriseAgentFramework, MIT, last pushed 2026-11-02. 1% of the last 100 commits carry a verified signature; the rest can't be tied to a verified identity.
-
Review and release Weak
OpenSSF Scorecard rates the repository's practices 2.6/10 (scanned Oct 26, 2026). The checks that decide who can get a change released:
- Code Review0
- Branch Protection0
- Signed Releasesn/a
- Dangerous Workflown/a
- Token Permissionsn/a
- Pinned Dependencies2
All 18 Scorecard checks
Binary-Artifacts 10Branch-Protection 0CI-Tests -1CII-Best-Practices 0Code-Review 0Contributors 0Dangerous-Workflow -1Dependency-Update-Tool 0Fuzzing 0License 10Maintained 10Packaging -1Pinned-Dependencies 2SAST 0Security-Policy 0Signed-Releases -1Token-Permissions -1Vulnerabilities 0 -
Published packages None
No registry package. EnterpriseAgentFramework is used from its repository, so what you run is whatever you check out: pin a release tag or commit.
Changes to this chain
- 2026-09-06 OSSF Scorecard: 2.6/10
Evidence behind this score
Coverage C: 2 of 5 independent evidence types found.
- GitHub repository data
- Package downloads (missing)
- Supply-chain checks
- Public actions (missing)
- Community mentions (missing)
Verify this score yourself
Every build re-issues EnterpriseAgentFramework’s score as an Ed25519-signed credential, valid for 7 days. You can check it offline against HVTracker’s published key; if anyone changes a number after signing, verification fails.
What this score doesn’t check
It covers who ships the code, not what the code does. It doesn’t read tool descriptions or prompts for injected instructions, watch runtime behaviour, or find bugs nobody has disclosed yet. For that, run a content scanner before you connect it, such as Cisco MCP Scanner or Snyk Agent Scan.
How EnterpriseAgentFramework compares in Agent Frameworks
- #96 EvoAgentX 49.2 +0.2
- #97 Crabtalk 49.2 +0.2
- #98 EnterpriseAgentFramework 49.0 this agent
- #99 daydreams 48.1 −0.9
- #100 Magentic 47.1 −1.9
Bars show each HVTrust score; the tick marks EnterpriseAgentFramework’s 49.0.
Where the 49.0 comes from
HVTrust dimensions vs the Agent Frameworks average
49.0 / 100 · 100.0% confidenceEnterpriseAgentFramework Agent Frameworks average (130 agents)
Quick Trust Read
How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade D reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage C is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (2 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →
Rank Trend
Activity & Reach
Analysis
Activity Inputs
68.0 / 100Common questions about EnterpriseAgentFramework
Does EnterpriseAgentFramework publish package provenance?
Does EnterpriseAgentFramework have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
Is EnterpriseAgentFramework actively maintained?
What license does EnterpriseAgentFramework use?
Are EnterpriseAgentFramework's commits signed?
Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.
AI agent surface
MCP, providers, tool surface
These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →
- MCP signal live
- External deps live
- Tool / plugin surface live
- Package provenance drift live
Maintain EnterpriseAgentFramework?
For maintainers
HVTrust scores EnterpriseAgentFramework from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.
Reputation Timeline
Signal history
Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →
For maintainers
[](https://hvtracker.net/agents/enterpriseagentframework)
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/enterpriseagentframework"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/enterpriseagentframework.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>
Other agents in Agent Frameworks
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.4 · Raw JSON