updated 2026-09-26 10:08 UTC

AEC Model Bridge

Sam-AEC/aec-model-bridge

Independent Revit MCP ( Model Context Protocol integration for Revit software ).

MCP Servers Python Listed GPL-3.0

Is AEC Model Bridge safe? Thin or incomplete trust evidence. Review carefully before production use.

OSSF Scorecard 3.6 / 10
Provenance None
Signed commits 3%
Last push 3d ago
Compare AEC Model Bridge

How does it stack up against its MCP Servers neighbours?

Pick any agent to compare →
Suggest a correction

In detail: AEC Model Bridge scores 51.3/100 (Grade C), ranked #910 of 1325 tracked open-source AI agent projects, on evidence coverage C (2 of 5 independent signal types). The public evidence: no package-provenance attestation found; OSSF Scorecard rates its supply-chain practices 3.6/10; 3% of recent commits are signed; last pushed 2026-09-23. Every point is earned from checkable signals — never paid placement. How scoring works →

How AEC Model Bridge compares in MCP Servers

  1. #515 Memory Journal MCP 51.3 ±0
  2. #516 Starwind UI MCP 51.3 ±0
  3. #517 AEC Model Bridge 51.3 this agent
  4. #518 Glif 51.0 −0.3
  5. #519 Agent Memory MCP 51.0 −0.3

Bars show each HVTrust score; the tick marks AEC Model Bridge’s 51.3.

Where the 51.3 comes from

HVTrust dimensions vs the MCP Servers average

51.3 / 100 · 100.0% confidence

AEC Model Bridge MCP Servers average (775 agents)

Safety / Integrity50% OSSF Scorecard · 30% provenance · 20% signed commits
4.7 / 25
5.6 below avg 10.3
Identity / Provenance60% listing status · 40% build provenance
10.8 / 18
2.6 below avg 13.4
Transparency50% declared license · 50% OSSF Scorecard
11.6 / 17
0.6 below avg 12.2
Maintenance60% last-push freshness · 40% commit activity
17.9 / 20
5.8 above avg 12.1
AdoptionLog-scaled stars · package downloads
4.3 / 20
2.9 below avg 7.2

Quick Trust Read

What Would Improve It
Publish package provenance or release attestations for stronger supply-chain evidence.
Recent Changes
2026-09-25
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 30 spots (#879 → #909)
2026-09-23
Provider Added
Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: Anthropic
2026-09-23
Mcp Status Changed
Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented
Maintainer Checklist
Raise Scorecard signals Current OSSF Scorecard is 3.6/10. Tighten the weakest checks to improve public safety evidence.
Publish provenance Add package provenance or release attestations so users can verify where shipped artifacts came from.
Increase signed commits Raise the share of verified-signed commits to make maintainer identity and release history easier to trust.
Compare with another agent Get email alerts for AEC Model Bridge View MCP Servers Report missing data
60.7
Activity sub-score · out of 100
#517
In MCP Servers

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption. Grade C reflects the trust score band: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Evidence coverage C is separate — it grades how many independent signal types back the score (2 of 5), so a high score on thin evidence stays visible. Full methodology →

Signals refreshed 2026-09-26 10:08 UTC · Repo last pushed 3 days ago

Rank Trend

2026-08-11 2026-09-26

Activity & Reach

Stars
63
Forks
22
Last Push
2026-09-23
3 days ago
Commits (4 wk)
32
Downloads (7d)
—
HN mentions (30d)
—
Open Issues
0
Rank Change
▼1
was #909

Analysis

Activity Inputs

60.7 / 100
StarsRepository reach
10.8 / 30
FreshnessLast push recency
24.6 / 25
ActivityRecent commits
18.9 / 25
CommunityFork signal
6.3 / 20

Supply Chain Trust

Package Provenance
None
No package attestations found
OSSF Scorecard
3.6 / 10
OpenSSF Scorecard · scanned Sep 25, 2026
Signed Commits
3%
of last 100 commits verified
Binary-Artifacts 10
Branch-Protection 0
CI-Tests 0
CII-Best-Practices 0
Code-Review 0
Contributors 0
Dangerous-Workflow 10
Dependency-Update-Tool 0
Fuzzing 0
License 10
Maintained 10
Packaging -1
Pinned-Dependencies 2
SAST 0
Security-Policy 4
Signed-Releases 0
Token-Permissions 8
Vulnerabilities 0

Common questions about AEC Model Bridge

Public trust evidence for AEC Model Bridge is thin: several supply-chain signals are missing or weak. This does not mean the project is unsafe — it means an outside observer cannot easily verify the usual integrity checks. Treat with extra scrutiny.
Does AEC Model Bridge publish package provenance?
No published build provenance is currently detected for AEC Model Bridge. This is common for open-source projects but means consumers cannot independently verify that the package on the registry matches the GitHub source.
Does AEC Model Bridge have an OpenSSF Scorecard?
AEC Model Bridge has an OpenSSF Scorecard score of 3.6/10. The Scorecard checks for branch protection, signed releases, dependency updates, fuzzing, code review, and other supply-chain hygiene items. See the full check breakdown on this page.
Is AEC Model Bridge actively maintained?
Actively maintained. The repository was pushed to within the last 3 day(s).
What license does AEC Model Bridge use?
AEC Model Bridge ships under GPL-3.0. A declared, OSI-approved license is one of the transparency signals HVTrust scores.
Are AEC Model Bridge's commits signed?
3% of the last 100 commits to AEC Model Bridge are verified-signed (GPG, SSH, S/MIME, or GitHub's signing flow). Signed commits help confirm that code was authored by who the commit claims.

Not a safety endorsement. HVTracker describes what public signals show, not whether a project is safe for your use case. Run your own security review before adopting in production.

AI agent surface

MCP, providers, tool surface
Scored in HVTrust

These runtime-trust fields — detected from public repo docs and manifests — contribute a bounded adjustment to this project's HVTrust score alongside supply-chain evidence. The exact values each field can add or subtract are documented in the methodology → Compare this surface across every listed agent in the capability matrix →

MCP Server Support
high confidence
Implemented
AEC Model Bridge appears to expose MCP server capabilities.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
External Service Dependencies
medium confidence
1 detected
Public provider/service dependencies detected.
Credential signal: No explicit API-key/config marker detected.
Tool / Plugin Surface
None detected
No clear plugin system or broad tool surface detected.
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
Package Provenance Drift
N/A
No package source configured
Detailed evidence is not shown in the public view.
  • MCP signal live
  • External deps live
  • Tool / plugin surface live
  • Package provenance drift live
How this surface has changed

Detected changes to AEC Model Bridge's runtime surface and supply-chain posture, from daily public-signal snapshots. A change here means our detectors see something different — a genuinely changed capability, or better evidence of an existing one.

2026-09-23
Provider Added
Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: Anthropic
2026-09-23
Mcp Status Changed
Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented

Maintain AEC Model Bridge?

For maintainers

HVTrust scores AEC Model Bridge from public signals only — we never contact maintainers first. If a signal is wrong, stale, or missing (provenance you publish, a Scorecard you run, signed releases), tell us and we'll review it. Corrections are public and tracked on GitHub.

Submit a correction → Add the trust badge

Reputation Timeline

Signal history
Rank 25Score 4HVTrust 3Listed 2Scorecard 1Delisted 1Grade 1MCP 1Surface 1
2026-09-25
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 30 spots (#879 → #909)
2026-09-23
Provider Added
Runtime surface grew — new detected provider dependency: Anthropic
2026-09-23
Mcp Status Changed
Detected MCP server support changed: none → implemented
2026-09-23
Grade Changed
Trust grade D → C
2026-09-23
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 353 spots (#523 → #876)
2026-09-23
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 12.5pts (39.5 → 52.0)
2026-09-23
Activity Score Changed
Activity score up 6pts (55 → 61)
2026-09-22
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #523
2026-09-21
Removed From Active Tracking
Removed from active tracking
2026-09-16
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 22 spots (#976 → #998)
2026-09-15
Rank Moved
Rank rose 83 spots (#1059 → #976)
2026-09-15
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 3.7pts (44.8 → 48.5)
2026-09-15
Activity Score Changed
Activity score up 10pts (40 → 50)
2026-09-09
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 14 spots (#1020 → #1034)
2026-09-08
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 10 spots (#1010 → #1020)
2026-09-07
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 39 spots (#971 → #1010)
2026-09-06
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 12 spots (#959 → #971)
2026-09-05
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 48 spots (#911 → #959)
2026-09-04
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 28 spots (#883 → #911)
2026-09-03
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 54 spots (#829 → #883)
2026-09-02
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 46 spots (#783 → #829)
2026-09-01
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 33 spots (#750 → #783)
2026-08-31
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 35 spots (#715 → #750)
2026-08-30
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 26 spots (#689 → #715)
2026-08-29
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 48 spots (#641 → #689)
2026-08-28
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 14 spots (#627 → #641)
2026-08-27
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 18 spots (#609 → #627)
2026-08-26
Scorecard Added
OSSF Scorecard: 3.9/10
2026-08-26
Rank Moved
Rank rose 531 spots (#1140 → #609)
2026-08-26
HVTrust Changed
HVTrust up 27.2pts (18.8 → 46.0)
2026-08-26
Activity Score Changed
Activity score up 5pts (36 → 42)
2026-08-20
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 10 spots (#1129 → #1139)
2026-08-19
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 120 spots (#1009 → #1129)
2026-08-19
Activity Score Changed
Activity score down 15pts (52 → 37)
2026-08-17
Rank Moved
Rank rose 11 spots (#1020 → #1009)
2026-08-16
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 33 spots (#987 → #1020)
2026-08-12
Rank Moved
Rank rose 14 spots (#990 → #976)
2026-08-10
Rank Moved
Rank dropped 54 spots (#927 → #981)
2026-08-08
Newly Listed
First tracked at rank #916
GitHub →

Embed Badge Badge guide for maintainers →

For maintainers
HVTrust 51.3 Grade C
Markdown:
[![HVTrust](https://hvtracker.net/badge/aec-model-bridge.svg)](https://hvtracker.net/agents/aec-model-bridge)
HTML:
<a href="https://hvtracker.net/agents/aec-model-bridge"><img src="https://hvtracker.net/badge/aec-model-bridge.svg" alt="HVTrust"></a>

Other agents in MCP Servers

Data sources
GitHub REST API (repo, commits, stars, forks, license) · OpenSSF Scorecard CLI
Each agent's signals refresh once daily across 6 staggered batches. Methodology v4.3 · Raw JSON